System and Method for Anycast Transport Optimization

• US 20100153802A1
• Filed: 12/15/2008
• Published: 06/17/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 12/15/2008
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: AT&T Intellectual Property I LP (AT&T, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: AT&T Corporation (AT&T, Inc.)
• Inventors: Spatscheck, Oliver, Van der Merwe, Jacobus, Lee, Seungjoon
• Application Number:
  US12/335,293
• Publication Number:
  US 20100153802A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 714/748
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 12/1868 Measures taken after transmission, e.g. acknowledgments
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 12/1881 with schedule organisation, e.g. priority, sequence management
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 12/1886 with traffic restrictions for efficiency improvement, e.g. involving subnets or subdomains
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 41/509 wherein the managed service relates to media content delivery, e.g. audio, video or TV
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/1001 for accessing one among a plurality of replicated servers
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/101 based on network conditions
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/56 Provisioning of proxy services store-and-forward switching systems in data switching networks H04L12/54
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/567 Integrating service provisioning from a plurality of service providers

Abstract

A system includes first, second, and third content servers, and an edge server. The first, second, and third content servers each are configured to cache content. The edge server is in communication with the first, second, and third content servers. The edge server is configured to receive a content request, and to request different portions of the content from each of the first, second, and third content servers based on a network cost of each of the first, second, and third content servers.

Claims

1. A method comprising:

receiving an anycast request for content at an edge server from a client device;

determining a network cost for each of first, second, and third content servers connected to the edge server;

sending a first content request for a first portion of the content to the first content server based on the network cost for the first content server;

sending a second content request for a second portion of the content to the second content server based on the network cost for the second content server;

sending a third content request for a third portion of the content to the third content server based on the network cost for the third content server;

receiving the first, second, and third portions of the content at the edge server; and

sending the first, second, and third portions of the content to the client device.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the network costs is a server load, a network distance, a network capacity, a network utilization, an available bandwidth, a server spare capacity, or any combination thereof.

3. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

determining that one of the first, second, and third portions of content is lost;

requesting the lost portions of content from one of the first, second, and third content servers based on the network cost of each of the first, second, and third content servers;

receiving the lost portions of content; and

sending the lost portions of content to the client device.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the first, second, and third portions are different data ranges of the content.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein the different data ranges are different sizes based on the network cost for each of the first, second, and third content servers.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein the edge server is selected from a group consisting of a load balancing switch and a content distribution network router.

7. A method comprising:

receiving a content request at an edge server from a client device;

determining a load of each of a plurality of content servers in communication with the edge server;

requesting different portions of the content request from each of the content servers based on the load on each of the content servers;

receiving the different portions of content from the content servers; and

sending the different portions of content to the client device.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein the different portions are different data ranges of the content.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein the different data ranges are different sizes based on the load of each of the plurality of content servers.

10. The method of claim 7 further comprising:

determining that one of the different portions of content is lost;

requesting the one of the different portions of content lost from one of the plurality of content servers based on the load for each of the plurality of content servers;

receiving the one of the different portions of content lost; and

sending the one of the different portions of content lost to the client device.

11. The method of claim 7 wherein the edge server is selected from a group consisting of a load balancing switch and a content distribution network router.

12. A system comprising:

first, second, and third content servers, each configured to cache content; and

an edge server in communication with the first, second, and third content servers, the edge server configured to receive a content request, to request different portions of the content from each of the first, second, and third content servers based on a network cost of each of the first, second, and third content servers.

13. The system of claim 12 wherein the network cost is a server load, a network distance, a network capacity, a network utilization, an available bandwidth, a server spare capacity, or any combination thereof.

14. The system of claim 12 wherein the first, second, and third portions are different data ranges of the content.

15. The system of claim 14 wherein the different data ranges are different sizes based on the network cost for each of the first, second, and third content servers.

16. The system of claim 12 wherein the edge server is further configured to determine that one of the different portions of the content is lost, and further configured to request the one of the different portions lost from one of the first, second, and third content servers based on the network cost of each of the first, second, and third content servers.

17. A computer readable medium comprising a plurality of instructions to manipulate a processor, the plurality of instructions comprising:

instructions to receive an anycast request for content at an edge server from a client device;

instructions to determine a network cost for each of first, second, and third content servers connected to the edge server;

instructions to send a first content request for a first portion of the content to the first content server based on the network cost for the first content server;

instructions to send a second content request for a second portion of the content to the second content server based on the network cost for the second content server;

instructions to send a third content request for a third portion of the content to the third content server based on the network cost for the third content server;

instructions to receive the first, second, and third portions of the content at the edge server; and

instructions to send the first, second, and third portions of the content to the client device.

18. The computer readable medium of claim 17 wherein the network costs is a server load, a network distance, a network capacity, a network utilization, an available bandwidth, a server spare capacity, or any combination thereof.

19. The computer readable medium of claim 17 further comprising:

instructions to determine that one of the first, second, and third portions of content is lost;

instructions to request the lost portions of content from one of the first, second, and third content servers based on the network cost of each of the first, second, and third content servers;

instructions to receive the lost portions of content; and

instructions to send the lost portions of content to the client device.

20. The computer readable medium of claim 17 wherein the first, second, and third portions are different data ranges of the content.

21. The computer readable medium of claim 20 wherein the different data ranges are different sizes based on the network cost for each of the first, second, and third content servers.

22. A computer readable medium comprising a plurality of instructions to manipulate a processor, the plurality of instructions comprising:

instructions to receive a content request at an edge server from a client device;

instructions to determine a load of each of a plurality of content servers in communication with the edge server;

instructions to request different portions of the content request from each of the content servers based on the load on each of the content servers;

instructions to receive the different portions of content from the content servers; and

instructions to send the different portions of content to a client device.

23. The computer readable medium of claim 22 wherein the different portions are different data ranges of the content.

24. The computer readable medium of claim 23 wherein the different data ranges are different sizes based on the load of each of the first, second, and third content servers.

25. The computer readable medium of claim 22 further comprising:

instructions to determine that one of the different portions of content is lost;

instructions to request the one of the different portions of content lost from one of the plurality of content servers based on the load for each of the plurality of content servers;

instructions to receive the one of the different portions of content lost; and

instructions to send the one of the different portions of content lost to the client device.