Automated Adaption Based Upon Prevailing Threat Levels in a Security System

• US 20100156628A1
• Filed: 12/18/2008
• Published: 06/24/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 12/18/2008
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Titan Holdings LLC
• Original Assignee: Titan Holdings LLC
• Inventors: Ainsbury, Robert, Lahham, Muwaffa
• Application Number:
  US12/338,668
• Publication Number:
  US 20100156628A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 340/540
• CPC Class Codes: G07C 9/27 with central registration
• CPC Class Codes: G07C 9/28 the pass enabling tracking or indicating presence
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 1/14 indicating individual free spaces in parking areas

Abstract

Four threat levels reflect a prevailing risk and can be adjusted, for example, when local authorities advise of an increased likelihood of terrorist activity. Thus, a higher threat level in such system indicates a higher level of risk to a particular facility. In an embodiment of the invention, the behavior of the system changes with a simple adjustment to the threat level.

Claims

1. A computer implemented method for automating an adapting system based upon prevailing threat levels in a security system, comprising the steps of:

providing an administration facility for establishing a plurality of threat levels and corresponding threat level behaviors for a facility-wide security mechanism;

storing said threat levels and corresponding threat level behaviors in a database;

communicating a threat level to a control system;

said control system adapting a current configuration of said facility-wide security mechanism in accordance with threat level behaviors that correspond to said communicated threat level by altering operation of security features associated with said facility and by altering communicated security procedures and a manner in which said security procedures are communicated;

said control system monitoring said facility for changes in facility status, wherein said changes comprise any of physical changes established by any of a plurality of detection means and virtual changes established by data input; and

said control system communicating said monitored facility status changes to said database for use by said administration facility in determining establishment of a new threat level and maintenance of a current threat level, and in adapting said threat level behaviors by altering responses of said facility-wide security mechanisms for one or more threat levels as appropriate.

2. The method of claim 1, comprising at least four threat levels, including:

normal, elevated, high, and severe;

wherein a higher threat level indicates a higher level of risk.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein responses of said facility-wide security mechanisms for one or more threat levels are altered by any of:

changing an average percentage of inspections that should be performed at each of the threat levels;

changing response based upon the classes of vehicles entering or within the facility; and

changing an amount of information that needs to be captured for each vehicle visiting the facility.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein, depending upon threat level any of:

registered vehicles are tagged and the database maintains vehicle, and authorized driver information, and whether a fast track feature is on, in which vehicles are reserved for known VIP vehicles and generally attract a very low incident of ad-hoc inspection when the threat level is Normal;

information on non-registered vehicles is captured at point of entry, including a field that determines how long a user is allowed on the premises, and the ability to store photos of the vehicle including photos of the vehicle'"'"'s license plate and its occupants;

parking areas are zoned with readers to alert when vehicles park in a wrong area;

permitted locations are established and maintained, where in large facilities with distributed barriers, automated barrier opening is allowed based on the permitted locations;

non-registered vehicles may be optionally given a tag that is returned upon departure to allow barriers to be opened inside the facility automatically, and to alert if a car strays into an unauthorized, un-barricaded location;

hardware integration is provided which operates standard security hardware including barriers, biometric readers, keypads, push buttons, etc.;

a determination is made when a vehicle must be inspected on both entry and exit, wherein a guard may request an inspection when an inspection is not made automatically;

a control room can set threat levels, where higher threat levels result in more vehicle inspections;

a guard can submit an incident report;

reports, on line and printed, showing vehicle activity, inspection activity, guard activity, and incidents, may be provided;

an administrator can configure details, including tolerance for inspections, information to capture during inspection, data retained about visitors, and fields for registered vehicles;

messages can be sent between a control room and guards using both handheld devices and a browser;

integrated video displays real-time surveillance for an arrival application; and

both a handheld device and an arrival application have alarm buttons to alert a control room, and all other users, that an incident is in progress.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of:

said administration facility providing an individual risk settings facility with which a plurality of conditions and settings can be defined at installation time and can be adjusted by a system administrator at any time.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of:

providing a perimeter guardian module integrated with a security platform to direct specialized security technologies, gathering of sensor data, gathering of biometric data, and management of data that are stored to an independent data store.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of:

providing a facility guardian module for tracking a location of people and assets discretely anywhere in a facility, in real time.

8. The method of claim 1, said administration facility addressing a plurality of classes of behavior regarding threat levels, including at least:

administering changing threat levels and displaying an active level; and

changing facility behaviors based on a prevailing threat level.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of:

providing a security supervisor facility comprising a threat level control with which threat level change functionality and/or level is displayed.

10. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of:

providing a prevailing threat level indication comprising an application background having a color or grey scale system that reflects a prevailing threat level.

11. The method of claim 1, further comprising, for each threat level, the steps of:

identifying risk factors; and

empirically threat scoring each factor.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein said risk factors comprise any of the following:

number of occupants, gender of occupants, vehicle load bearing capacity, vehicle markings, country of origin, vehicle owner organization, transparency, and frequency of visit.

13. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of;

taking a predetermined minimum number of actions wi thout regard to threat level.

14. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of:

introducing a random factor to ensure that actions at a facility are not entirely predictable.

15. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of:

adapting to factor risk tolerance of an organization and willingness to disrupt operations at a facility into actions to be taken depending upon threat level.

16. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of:

adapting facility behaviors based on prevailing risk, where the less the risk, the fewer the steps for a particular behavior.

17. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of:

providing a plurality of risk Indicators that provide additional information that, for a particular facility, are considered to affect risk assessment.

18. An apparatus for automating an adapting system based upon prevailing threat levels in a security system, comprising:

an administration facility for establishing a plurality of threat levels and corresponding threat level behaviors for a facility-wide security mechanism;

a database for storing said threat levels and corresponding threat level behaviors;

a control system for adapting a current configuration of said facility-wide security mechanism in accordance with threat level behaviors that correspond to a communicated threat level by altering operation of security features associated with said facility and by altering communicated security procedures and a manner in which said security procedures are communicated;

a facility for communicating a threat level to said control system;

said control system monitoring said facility for changes in facility status, wherein said changes comprise any of physical changes established by any of a plurality of detection means and virtual changes established by data input; and

said control system communicating said monitored facility status changes to said database for use by said administration facility in determining establishment of a new threat level and maintenance of a current threat level, and in adapting said threat level behaviors by altering responses of said facility-wide security mechanisms for one or more threat levels as appropriate.

19. The apparatus of claim 18, comprising at least four threat levels, including:

normal, elevated, high, and severe;

wherein a higher threat level indicates a higher level of risk.