MODELING TOOL BUILDER - GRAPHICAL EDITOR CONSTRUCTION

• US 20100162208A1
• Filed: 12/19/2008
• Published: 06/24/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 12/19/2008
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Vasilov, Vadim, Sela, Aviad, Fisher, Amit, Amid, David, Anaby-Tavor, Ateret, Shachor, Gal
• Application Number:
  US12/339,403
• Publication Number:
  US 20100162208A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 717/107
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/10 Requirements analysis; Specification techniques
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/37 Compiler construction; Parser generation

Abstract

A modeling tool may be created directed from a drawing. A plurality of components and their relationships are deduced from the drawing and defined as a metamodel. One or more user operations performed while creating the drawing are also determined and used in building the metamodel. The metamodel may be used in a fixed mode to create a model with definition of the metamodel. The metamodel may be also used in a flexible mode to further redefine the metamodel or create a second metamodel.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method for building a modeling tool, comprising:

determining a plurality of components in a drawing;

defining the plurality of components as plurality model components, respectfully;

determining one or more relationships between the plurality of components in the drawing; and

defining said one or more relationships between the plurality of components as one or more model component relationships, said plurality of model components and said one or more model component relationships forming a metamodel of the drawing.

2. The method of claim 1, further including:

deducing semantics rules for the metamodel based on said one or more relationships.

3. The method of claim 1, further including:

said determining and defining steps are performed dynamically as the drawing is being drawn.

4. The method of claim 1, further including:

determining one or more user operations performed while creating the drawing; and

using said one or more user operations to determine the plurality of components and said one or more relationships between the plurality of components in the drawing.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the drawing is created using a computer tool unrelated to the metamodel.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of components and said one or more relationships between the plurality of components are determined using visual cues in the drawing.

7. The method of claim 1, further including:

using the metamodel to further build a second metamodel.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the metamodel is used in a fixed mode for creating a model of the metamodel.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the metamodel is used in a flexible mode for further redefining the metamodel.

10. The method of claim 9, further including allowing a user to create a model using the metamodel, and allowing one or more model definition violations to be committed when using the metamodel.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein said model definition violations are reported to the user and used to redefine the metamodel.

12. A system for building a modeling tool, comprising:

a processor;

a first module operable to determine a plurality of components in a drawing and one or more relationships between the plurality of components in the drawing, said first module further operable to determine one or more user operations performed while creating the drawing; and

a second module operable to define the plurality of components as a plurality model components, respectfully, and said one or more relationships between the plurality of components as one or more model component relationships,

a model creator module operable to generate a metamodel using said plurality of model components, said one or more model component relationships and said one or more user actions.

13. The system of claim 12, further including:

a visualizer tool operable to allow a user to further refine the generated metamodel.

14. A method of building a modeling tool, comprising:

configuring a modeling tool, the step of configuring further comprising at least defining a meta model and specifying building blocks and semantics for the meta model;

generating a modeling tool using the defined meta model;

executing the modeling tool in flexible mode in which the semantics of the meta model is overridden in creating a model using the meta model, or in a strict mode in which the semantics of the meta model are strictly enforced; and

if one or more definitions in the semantics of the meta model is overridden with one or more new definitions, allowing redefining of the meta model based on said one or more new definitions.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the step of configuring further includes customizing one or more functionalities that operates with the meta model.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein step of customizing said one or more functionalities include customizing functionalities including at least tool bar, palette, properties and views in accordance with a user preference.

17. The method of claim 14, wherein the step of executing the modeling tool includes executing the modeling tool in flexible mode in which the semantics of the meta model is overridden in creating a model using the meta model.

18. The method of claim 14, wherein the step of defining a meta model further includes learning from an instance of a drawing and using formally specified definitions or combinations thereof.

19. The method of claim 14, wherein the step of defining a meta model further includes learning from an instance of a drawing and the step of learning from an instance of a drawing includes:

determining one or more components in the drawing;

determining one or more relationships between said one more components in the drawing; and

deducing one or more building blocks and semantics for the meta model from said determined one or more components and said determined one or more relationships.

20. The method of claim 19, further including:

said steps of determining one or more components and one or more relationships are performed dynamically as the drawing is being drawn.

21. The method of claim 19, further including:

determining one or more user operations performed while creating the drawing; and

using said one or more user operations to determine said one or more components and said one or more relationships.

22. A system for building a modeling tool, comprising:

a computer-implemented configuration module operable to configure a modeling tool, the configuration module further operable to at least define a meta model and specify building blocks and semantics for the meta model; and

a computer-implemented modeling tool generator module operable to generate the modeling tool based on the defined meta model and specified building blocks and semantics, said generated modeling tool operable to execute in flexible mode in which the semantics of the meta model is overridden in creating a model using the meta model, or in a strict mode in which the semantics of the meta model are strictly enforced, and if one or more definitions in the semantics of the meta model is overridden with one or more new definitions, the generated modeling tool further operable to allow redefining of the meta model based on said one or more new definitions.

23. The system of claim 22, wherein the configuration module is further operable to customize one or more functionalities that operates with the meta model.

24. The system of claim 23, wherein the configuration module is further operable to customize said one or more functionalities including at least customizing tool bar, palette, properties and views in accordance with a user preference.

25. A program storage device readable by a machine, tangibly embodying a program of instructions executable by the machine to perform a method of building a modeling tool, comprising:

configuring a modeling tool, the step of configuring further comprising at least defining a meta model and specifying building blocks and semantics for the meta model;

generating a modeling tool using the defined meta model;

executing the modeling tool in flexible mode in which the semantics of the meta model is overridden in creating a model using the meta model, or in a strict mode in which the semantics of the meta model are strictly enforced; and

if one or more definitions in the semantics of the meta model is overridden with one or more new definitions, allowing redefining of the meta model based on said one or more new definitions.