COMPUTERIZED TEST APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR QUANTIFYING PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF HUMAN RESPONSES TO STIMULI

• US 20100178640A1
• Filed: 01/12/2010
• Published: 07/15/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 01/12/2009
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Neuro-Technology Solutions Ltd.
• Original Assignee: Neuro - Technology Solutions Limited
• Inventors: Yachin, Nir
• Application Number:
  US12/685,847
• Publication Number:
  US 20100178640A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 434/236
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/168 Evaluating attention deficit, hyperactivity

Abstract

A computerized method and apparatus for measuring effects of distraction on a human subject, including presenting at least one stimulus, at least one visual distraction and at least one audio distraction to a subject; measuring at least one aspect of at least one of the subject'"'"'s commissions and omissions responsive to the stimulus; computing an indication of quality of at least one of the subject'"'"'s commissions and omissions when visual distraction is present; and computing an indication of quality of at least one of the subject'"'"'s commissions and omissions when audio distraction is present.

Claims

1. A method for measuring effects of distraction on a human subject, the method comprising:

presenting at least one stimulus, at least one visual distraction and at least one audio distraction to a subject;

measuring at least one aspect of at least one of the subject'"'"'s commissions and omissions responsive to said stimulus;

computing an indication of quality of at least one of the subject'"'"'s commissions and omissions when said visual distraction is present; and

computing an indication of quality of at least one of the subject'"'"'s commissions and omissions when said audio distraction is present.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

computing an indication of quality of at least one of the subject'"'"'s commissions and omissions when said audio and visual distractions are both present.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising using at least one of said indications to quantify attentiveness.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising using at least one of said indications to quantify hyperactivity.

21. The method of claim 1, and also comprising:

using at least one of said indications to quantify impulsiveness.

5. A computerized test system comprising:

apparatus for measuring a plurality of characteristics of responses generated by subjects;

a library of candidate syndromes, each candidate syndrome comprising a set of value ranges for at least some of said plurality of characteristics; and

a counter operative to accumulate a number of subjects answering to each candidate syndrome in the library and to provide a syndrome-identified output when the number of subjects answering to an individual candidate syndrome exceeds a predetermined threshold.

6. A system for measuring effects of distraction on a human subject, the system comprising:

a presentation generator operative to present to a subject at least one stimulus accompanied by at least one distraction selected from a universe of distractions including at least one visual distraction and at least one audio distraction; and

a performance measurement unit operative to measure the subject'"'"'s test performance as affected by at least one audio distraction, to measure the subject'"'"'s test performance as affected by at least one visual distraction, and to compare the two performances thereby to characterize the subject'"'"'s differential response to audio and visual distractions.

7. The system of claim 6, wherein said performance measurement unit is also operative to measure the subject'"'"'s test performance as affected by at least one audio distraction in combination with at least one video distraction.

8. The system of claim 6, wherein said performance measurement unit is also operative to measure at least one aspect of at least one of the subject'"'"'s commissions and omissions responsive to said stimulus.

9. The system of claim 6, wherein said performance measurement unit is also operative to compute an indication of quality of at least one of the subject'"'"'s commissions and omissions when said visual distraction is present.

10. The system of claim 6, wherein said performance measurement unit is also operative to compute an indication of quality of at least one of the subject'"'"'s commissions and omissions when said audio distraction is present.

11. The system of claim 6, wherein said universe of distractions includes a plurality of visual distractions with a corresponding plurality of profiles of visual characteristics.

12. The system of claim 6, wherein said universe of distractions includes a plurality of audio distractions with a corresponding plurality of profiles of audio characteristics.

13. The system of claim 11, wherein said performance measurement unit is operative to compare the subject'"'"'s performance as affected by a visual distraction with a first profile of visual characteristics, with the subject'"'"'s performance as affected by a visual distraction with a second, different profile of visual characteristics.

14. The system of claim 12, wherein said performance measurement unit is operative to compare the subject'"'"'s performance as affected by a audio distraction with a first profile of audio characteristics, with the subject'"'"'s performance as affected by a audio distraction with a second, different profile of audio characteristics.

24. The system of claim 6, further comprising an electro-physical measurement device in data communication with said performance measurement unit.

15. A method for measuring effects of distraction on a human subject, the method comprising:

presenting at least one stimulus to a subject;

generating a reaction time parameter representing the subject'"'"'s reaction time and measuring at least one aspect of at least one of the subject'"'"'s commissions and omissions responsive to said stimulus, other than reaction time; and

generating an output characterizing the subject as a function of said reaction time parameter and of said aspect other than reaction time.

16. The method of claim 15, further comprising measuring the subject'"'"'s reaction time in response to a set of stimuli that is not identical to a set of stimuli including only said stimulus, and wherein said reaction time parameter is computed as a function of the subject'"'"'s reaction time responsive to said stimulus, relative to the subject'"'"'s reaction time responsive to said set of stimuli.

17. The method of claim 16 wherein said set of stimuli comprises an empty set (void).

22. The method of claim 15, and wherein said aspect other than reaction time comprises at least one of:

an aspect of the order of the subject'"'"'s commissions and omissions;

an aspect of the relative timing of the subject'"'"'s commissions and omissions; and

timing of commissions and omissions relative to a void time period in which said stimulus is not presented to the subject.

18. A method for measuring a human subject'"'"'s performance as a function of at least one stimulus, the method comprising:

measuring the subject'"'"'s performance responsive to presence of at least one stimulus displayed on a computer screen thereby to generate a first performance output;

measuring the subject'"'"'s performance responsive to absence of said at least one stimulus from said computer screen thereby to generate a second performance output; and

comparing said first and second first performance outputs thereby to generate a characterization of said human subject'"'"'s performance as a function of said at least one stimulus.

19. The method of claim 18, and also comprising:

presenting to a subject at least one stimulus accompanied by at least one distraction selected from a universe of distractions; and

measuring the subject'"'"'s performance as affected by at least one distraction, and comparing the two performances.

20. A system for measuring effects of stimuli on a human subject, the system comprising:

a delayed response monitor operative to monitor a subject'"'"'s tendency to respond to a stimulus after the stimulus has terminated.

23. A manufacture comprising a computer-usable medium having computer readable program code embodied therein, said computer readable program code adapted to be executed to implement a method for measuring effects of distraction on a human subject, the method comprising:

presenting at least one stimulus, at least one visual distraction and at least one audio distraction to a subject;

measuring at least one aspect of at least one of the subject'"'"'s commissions and omissions responsive to said stimulus;

computing an indication of quality of at least one of the subject'"'"'s commissions and omissions when said visual distraction is present; and

computing an indication of quality of at least one of the subject'"'"'s commissions and omissions when said audio distraction is present.