Well Performance Modeling In A Collaborative Well Planning Environment

• US 20100191516A1
• Filed: 07/22/2008
• Published: 07/29/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 09/07/2007
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Bruce A. Dale, James E. Holl, Rune Musum, Scott R. Clingman, Timothy G. Benish
• Original Assignee: Bruce A. Dale, James E. Holl, Rune Musum, Scott R. Clingman, Timothy G. Benish
• Inventors: Holl, James E., Clingman, Scott R., Dale, Bruce A., Benish, Timothy G., Musum, Rune
• Application Number:
  US12/663,819
• Publication Number:
  US 20100191516A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 703/10
• CPC Class Codes: E21B 43/00 Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells applicable only to water E03B

Abstract

Methods and systems are provided that may be utilized to make completion design an integral part of the well planning process by enabling the rapid evaluation of completion performance. This integration may include an earth model and may specify wellpath parameters, completion parameters, and other parameters in a simulation of operations using the earth model. The simulation generates well performance measures, which may be optimized depending on well performance technical limits. The optimization may be used to maximize an objective function. The system may include multiple users at the same or different locations (e.g. over a network) interacting through graphic user interfaces (GUI'"'"'s).

Claims

1. A method for well planning incorporating well completion design in a collaborative environment, comprising:

specifying one or more wellpath parameters defining a wellpath to at least one target within an earth model stored in memory;

specifying one or more completion parameters defining a completion operation;

simulating the completion operations using the earth model based on the wellpath parameters and the completion parameters to generate a set of well performance measures;

determining whether the well performance measures are within defined well performance technical limits;

if the well performance measures are within the defined well performance technical limits, optimizing well placement within the earth model stored in memory in order to maximize an objective function; and

if the well performance measures are not within the defined well performance technical limits, adjusting one of the wellpath parameters, the completion parameters, and any combination thereof to generate adjusted parameters and repeating the simulating operations utilizing the adjusted parameters.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising verifying facilities constraints, comprising comparing the facilities constraints to at least one of the well performance measures;

if the facilities constraints are within a threshold, optimizing well placement; and

if the facilities constraints are not within the threshold, adjusting one of the wellpath parameters, the completion parameters, and any combination thereof to generate adjusted parameters and repeating the simulating operations utilizing the adjusted parameters.

3. The method of claim 4, wherein optimizing well placement comprises varying at least one parameter, including at least the number of wells, existing well targets, well drilling constraints, completion details, wellpaths, and operating parameters to generate new well performance measures;

and

evaluating the new well performance measures against the defined well performance technical limits.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the optimization is performed by an automated optimization scheme via an optimization module in a computer system.

5. The method of claim 3, comprising repeating the method using an alternative earth model to generate alternative well performance measures.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein optimizing well placement comprises evaluating the well performance measures, the new well performance measures, and the alternative well performance measures using an objective function.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the objective function comprises a plurality of variables and optimizes at least one of probability of drilling success, well rates, recovery factors, various economic measures, and any combination thereof.

8. The method of claim 5, wherein the optimization module utilizes ranges of wellpath parameters and completion parameters to generate alternative performance measures.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising calculating optimal values for one or more of the completion parameters related to a casing design based on probabilistic load and resistance factors.

10. The method of claim 1, further comprising calculating optimal values for one or more of the completion parameters related to a casing design based on deterministic load and resistance factors.

11. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

applying a cost function to estimate costs based on one or more of the wellpath parameters and completion parameters.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the cost function produces an estimate of profitability based, at least partially, on completion parameters.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein specifying the one or more wellpath parameters defining the wellpath further comprises locating a well surface location within the earth model or a target.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein simulating operations using the earth model comprises:

extracting grid properties in one or more completion intervals of the earth model based on the wellpath parameters; and

upscaling the grid properties in the one or more completion intervals.

15. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

determining whether the well performance measures associated with a group of wells are within the well performance technical limits for the group of wells;

if the well performance measures associated with the group of wells are within the well performance technical limits, providing an indication to a user; and

if the well performance measures associated with the group of wells are not within the well performance technical limits, adjusting one or both of wellpath parameters and completion parameters for one or more wells in the group of wells.

16. The method of claim 1, wherein adjusting one of the wellpath parameters, the completion parameters, and any combination thereof is performed by one of multiple users in the collaborative environment via a graphical user interface.

17. The method of claim 16, wherein a graphical user interface adjusts a wellpath by manipulating a graphical representation of the wellpath based on input from one of the group of users.

18. A computer-readable medium containing a program to perform instructions associated with well planning incorporating well completion design in a collaborative environment, the instructions configured to:

provide a graphical user interface (GUI) configured to specify one or more wellpath parameters defining a wellpath to at least one target within an earth model of at least one reservoir and to specify one or more completion parameters defining completion operations;

simulate the completion operations using the earth model based on the wellpath parameters and the completion parameters to generate a set of well performance measures;

determine whether the well performance measures are within defined well performance technical limits;

if the well performance measures are within the defined well performance technical limits, optimize well placement within the earth model that is stored in memory in order to maximize an objective function; and

if the well performance measures are not within the defined well performance technical limits, adjust one of the wellpath parameters, the completion parameters, and any combination thereof to generate adjusted parameters and repeat the simulation operations utilizing the adjusted parameters.

19. The computer-readable medium of claim 18, wherein the adjustment is performed automatically by a module of the program.

20. The computer-readable medium of claim 18, wherein the adjustment is performed based on input from one of a group of users via the GUI.

21. The computer-readable medium of claim 20, wherein multiple users at different locations can adjust one or both of the wellpath parameters and the completion parameters via an instance of the GUI.

22. The computer-readable medium of claim 21, wherein the input from the one or more users via the GUI comprises a change in the wellpath in response to manipulation of a graphical representation of the wellpath in the GUI.

23. The computer-readable medium of claim 18, wherein the GUI allows one or more of the users to specify one or more of the wellpath parameters by defining a wellpath to the at least one target within the earth model by locating a well surface location within the earth model.

24. The computer-readable medium of claim 18, wherein optimizing well placement is performed by an optimization module and comprises varying at least one parameter, including at least the number of wells, existing well targets, well drilling constraints, completion details, wellpaths, and operating parameters to generate new well performance measures;

and

evaluating the new well performance measures against the defined well performance technical limits.

25. The computer-readable medium of claim 24, wherein the optimization module utilizes a range of wellpath parameters and completion parameters to generate alternative well performance measures.

26. The computer-readable medium of claim 18, wherein the instructions are configured to display a graphical representation of the generated set of well performance measures relative to the defined well performance technical limits.

27. A system for well planning incorporating well completion design in a collaborative environment comprising:

a processing engine for simulating well operations using an earth model of an earth formation including a reservoir to generate well performance measures and determine whether the well performance measures are within well performance technical limits; and

at least one graphical user interface (GUI) configured to specify one or more wellpath parameters defining a wellpath to at least one target within the earth model and to specify one or more completion parameters defining completion operations for use in the simulation by the processing engine, if the processing engine determines the well performance measures are within the well performance technical limits, provide an indication to a user, and if the processing engine determines the well performance measures are not within well performance technical limits, allow one or more users to adjust at least one of the wellpath parameters and the completion parameters to generate adjusted parameters for use by the processing engine in repeating the simulating operations utilizing the adjusted parameters.

28. The system of claim 27, wherein the processing engine resides on a first computer system and the at least one GUI resides on a second computer system.

29. The system of claim 27, wherein the at least one GUI comprises multiple instances of a GUI at different user locations.

30. The system of claim 29, wherein multiple users at different locations can adjust one or both of the wellpath parameters and the completion parameters via their corresponding instance of the GUI.

31. The system of claim 29, wherein the GUI is configured to adjust a wellpath by manipulating a graphical representation of the wellpath in the GUI based on input from one or more users.

32. The system of claim 31, wherein the processing engine automatically generates a new set of well performance measures in response to the adjusted wellpath.

33. The system of claim 29, wherein the GUI is configured to display a graphical representation of the generated set of well performance measures relative to the defined well performance technical limits.

34. The system of claim 33, wherein the GUI is configured to display a graphical representation of the generated set of well performance measures relative to the defined well performance technical limits in response to input from one of the users.