SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING PROPER DOWNFORCE FOR A PLANTER ROW UNIT

• US 20100198529A1
• Filed: 01/07/2008
• Published: 08/05/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 09/26/2007
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Precision Planting LLC (AGCO Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Precision Planting, Inc.
• Inventors: Sauder, Tim A., Baurer, Phil D., Sauder, Derek A., Koch, Justin L.
• Granted Patent: US 9,173,339 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 702/41
• CPC Class Codes: A01B 63/002 Devices for adjusting or regulating the position of tools or wheels preventing overstrain A01B61/00; wheels adjustable relatively to the frame for drawn implements A01B3/16; tools or tool holders adjustable relatively to the frame for drawn implements A01B63/24
• CPC Class Codes: A01B 63/111 regulating working depth of implements
• CPC Class Codes: A01B 63/114 to achieve a constant working depth
• CPC Class Codes: A01C 7/00 Sowing
• CPC Class Codes: A01C 7/203 comprising depth regulation means
• CPC Class Codes: A01C 7/205 comprising pressure regulation means
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 111/90 Methods of planting seeds and miscellaneous compositions
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 111/903 Monitor

Abstract

A system and method for determining the appropriate downforce on an agricultural planter row unit that minimizes soil compaction while maintaining desired furrow depth. A load sensor is disposed to generate a load signal corresponding to loading on a depth regulation member of the row unit. In one method a load margin is calculated based on a minimum detected load value. In another method, a load margin is derived through a statistical analysis of the detected load values. The load margin calculated or derived by any of the methods is indicative of the amount of supplemental down force that should be increased or decreased to bring the load margin toward zero. A ground contact parameter may also be used in connection with the load margin to provide further confidence on the proper amount of downforce required to ensure furrow depth while minimizing soil compaction.

Claims

1. A method of determining when to adjust supplemental down force on a row unit of an agricultural planter to ensure desired furrow depth while minimizing soil compaction, the method comprising:

(a) providing a load sensor disposed to generate a load signal corresponding to loading on a depth regulation member of the row unit;

(b) monitoring said generated load signal to identify a minimum load value occurring during a sampling period; and

(c) calculating a load margin based on said minimum load value.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein said minimum load value is a load value corresponding to the lowest signal magnitude during said sampling period.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein said minimum load value is a load value corresponding to the lowest signal magnitude during said sampling period having a duration at least equal to a critical time duration.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein said minimum load value is a load value corresponding to the lowest signal magnitude during said sampling period after applying a low pass filter to said monitored signal.

5. The method of claim 2 wherein said step of calculating a load margin includes subtracting a minimum load threshold from said minimum load value.

6. The method of claim 5 further comprising:

(d) displaying said calculated load margin on a visual display.

7. The method of claim 5 further comprising:

(d) adjusting a supplemental down force acting on said row unit to bring said calculated load margin toward zero.

8. The method of claim 5 wherein said minimum load threshold is at least about five pounds.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein said minimum load threshold is an operator input.

10. The method of claim 8 wherein said minimum load threshold is an input received through a GPS map interface.

11. The method of claim 3 wherein said step of calculating a load margin includes subtracting a minimum load threshold from said minimum load value.

12. The method of claim 11 further comprising:

(d) displaying said calculated load margin on a visual display.

13. The method of claim 11 further comprising:

(d) adjusting a supplemental down force acting on said row unit to bring said calculated load margin toward zero.

14. The method of claim 11 wherein said minimum load threshold is at least about five pounds and said critical time duration is at least about forty milliseconds.

15. The method of claim 14 wherein said minimum load threshold is an operator input.

16. The method of claim 14 wherein said minimum load threshold is an input through a GPS map interface.

17. The method of claim 4 wherein said step of calculating a load margin includes subtracting a minimum load threshold from said minimum load value.

18. The method of claim 17 further comprising:

(d) displaying said calculated load margin on a visual display.

19. The method of claim 17 further comprising:

(d) adjusting a supplemental down force acting on said row unit to bring said calculated load margin toward zero such that said loading is proximate said minimum load threshold.

20. The method of claim 17 wherein said minimum load threshold is at least about five pounds.

21. The method of claim 20 wherein said minimum load threshold is an operator input.

22. The method of claim 20 wherein said minimum load threshold is an input through a GPS map interface.

23. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

(d) displaying said calculated load margin on a visual display.

24. The method of claim 23 wherein said display of said calculated load margin is a graphical display of said calculated load margin.

25. The method of claim 24 wherein said graphical display includes a bar graph of said calculated load margin.

26. The method of claim 24 wherein said graphical display utilizes a color scheme in which different predefined colors are displayed corresponding to predefined magnitude ranges of said calculated margin.

27. The method of claim 25 wherein said bar graph utilizes a color scheme in which different predefined colors are displayed corresponding to predefined magnitude ranges of said calculated margin.

28. The method of claim 1 wherein said step of monitoring said generated load signal further includes detecting magnitudes of said generated load signal at preset time intervals comprising said sampling period.

29. The method of claim 28 further comprising:

(d) calculating a ground contact parameter by counting occurrences of said detected load values that are less than a minimum load threshold and dividing said counted occurrences by the number of preset time intervals comprising said sampling period.

30. The method of claim 29 further comprising:

(e) displaying said calculated ground contact parameter as a percentage on a visual display.

31. The method of claim 29 further comprising:

(e) adjusting a supplemental down force acting on said row unit so that said calculated ground contact parameter at least meets a desired minimum ground contact parameter.

32. The method of claim 28 further comprising:

(d) calculating a ground contact parameter by identifying consecutive occurrences where said detected load values are less than a minimum load threshold;

(e) determining a duration of said identified consecutive occurrences where said detected load values are less than said minimum load threshold;

(f) comparing said duration to a critical time duration;

(g) counting all occurrences comprising said identified consecutive occurrences in which said duration is at least equal to said critical time duration;

(h) dividing said counted occurrences by the number of preset time intervals comprising said sampling period.

33. The method of claim 32 further comprising:

(i) displaying said calculated ground contact parameter as a percentage on a visual display.

34. The method of claim 32 further comprising:

(i) adjusting a supplemental down force acting on said row unit so that said calculated ground contact parameter at least meets a desired minimum ground contact parameter.

35. A method of determining when to adjust supplemental down force on a row unit of an agricultural planter to ensure desired furrow depth while minimizing soil compaction, the method comprising:

(a) providing a load sensor disposed to generate a load signal corresponding to loading on a depth regulation member of the row unit;

(b) monitoring said generated load signal over a sampling period, wherein monitoring said generated load signal includes detecting a load value magnitude at preset time intervals comprising said sampling period; and

(c) deriving a load margin based on said monitored signal.

36. The method of claim 35 further comprising:

(d) defining a deviation factor; and

wherein said step (c) of deriving said load margin includes;

(i) calculating an average load value for said sampling period from said detected load values at said preset time intervals;

(ii) calculating a standard deviation of said detected load values during said sampling period;

(iii) multiplying said standard deviation by said deviation factor and subtracting the product thereof from said calculated average load value.

37. The method of claim 36 further comprising:

(e) displaying said derived load margin on a visual display.

38. The method of claim 36 further comprising:

(f) adjusting a supplemental down force acting on said row unit to bring said derived load margin toward zero.

39. The method of claim 36 wherein said deviation factor is between about one and about five.

40. The method of claim 36 wherein said deviation factor is about 2.5.

41. The method of claim 35 further comprising:

(d) defining a confidence factor, said confidence factor, when presented in decimal form, being less than one;

wherein said step (c) of deriving said load margin includes;

(i) for a time span comprising a present number of sampling periods, calculating an average load value for each of said sampling periods from said load values detected at said preset time intervals;

(ii) storing in memory said calculated average load value for each said sampling period comprising said time span;

(iii) determining a total count of said sampling period occurrences comprising said time span;

(iv) determining an ignore count by multiplying said total count of sampling period occurrences by said confidence factor and subtracting the product from said total count of sampling period occurrences;

(v) ordering said calculated average load values by magnitude;

(vi) beginning with the lowest in magnitude of said ordered calculated average load values, counting in a direction of increasing magnitude the number of ordered calculated load margins until said count equals said ignore count;

(vii) selecting as said derived load margin the next lowest in magnitude of said ordered calculated average load value after meeting said ignore count.

42. The method of claim 41 further comprising:

(e) displaying said derived load margin on a visual display.

43. The method of claim 41 further comprising:

(e) adjusting a supplemental down force acting on said row unit to bring said derived load margin toward zero.

44. The method of claim 41 wherein said confidence factor is between about ninety five percent and ninety nine percent.

45. The method of claim 35 further comprising:

(d) defining a confidence factor, said confidence factor, when presented in decimal form, being less than one;

wherein said step of deriving said load margin includes;

(i) for a time span comprising a present number of sampling periods, calculating an average load value for each of said sampling periods from said load values detected at said preset time intervals;

(ii) determining a total count of said sampling period occurrences comprising said time span;

(iii) defining a load margin scale divided into substantially equal increments of load value magnitude ranges;

(iv) sorting said sampling period occurrences by magnitude by assigning each of said calculated average load values to a corresponding one of said incremental load value magnitude ranges of said load margin scale;

(v) determining an ignore count by multiplying said total count of sampling period occurrences by said confidence factor and subtracting the product from said total count of sampling period occurrences;

(vi) beginning with a lowest one of said incremental load value magnitude ranges into which at least one of said sampling period occurrences has been sorted, counting each of said sorted sampling period occurrences within each of said incremental load value magnitude ranges until said count of sampling period occurrences equals said ignore count;

(vii) selecting as said derived load margin the next lowest of said incremental load value magnitude ranges into which at least one of said sampling period occurrences has been sorted after meeting said ignore count.

46. The method of claim 45 further comprising:

(e) displaying said derived load margin on a visual display.

47. The method of claim 45 further comprising:

(e) adjusting a supplemental down force acting on said row unit to bring said derived load margin toward zero.

48. The method of claim 45 wherein said confidence factor is between about ninety five percent and ninety nine percent.