Method and Device For Validating a Link Attribute In The Nodes Of Automatically Switched Optical Network

• US 20100202772A1
• Filed: 07/25/2008
• Published: 08/12/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 09/19/2007
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Fiberhome Telecommunications Technologies Company Limited (Wuhan Research Institute of Posts and Telecommunications)
• Original Assignee: Fiberhome Telecommunications Technologies Company Limited (Wuhan Research Institute of Posts and Telecommunications)
• Inventors: Song, Ran, Wei, Xueqin
• Application Number:
  US12/678,549
• Publication Number:
  US 20100202772A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 398/16
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 69/24 Negotiation of communication capabilities
• CPC Class Codes: H04Q 11/0062 Network aspects
• CPC Class Codes: H04Q 2011/0079 Operation or maintenance aspects

Abstract

The invention provides a method and device for verify link attributes in a node of an Automatically Switched Optical Network. In the Automatically Switched Optical Network, the node and another node are connected to a first port and a second port of one bidirectional link respectively, and the bidirectional link is divided into a first unidirectional link from the first port to the second port and a second unidirectional link from the second port to the first port. The method comprising the steps of: configuring a plurality of link attributes of the first unidirectional link in the node; receiving in the node a plurality of link attributes of the second unidirectional link configured in the another node from the another node; and comparing in the node the plurality of link attributes of the first unidirectional link with the received plurality of link attributes of the second unidirectional link respectively to check whether they match each other.

Claims

1-25. -25. (canceled)

26. A method for verifying link attributes in a node of an Automatically Switched Optical Network, the node and another node being connected to a first port and a second port of one bidirectional link respectively, the bidirectional link being divided into a first unidirectional link from the first port to the second port and a second unidirectional link from the second port to the first port, the method comprising the steps of:

configuring a plurality of link attributes of the first unidirectional link in the node;

receiving in the node a plurality of link attributes of the second unidirectional link configured in the another node from the another node; and

comparing in the node the plurality of link attributes of the first unidirectional link with the received plurality of link attributes of the second unidirectional link respectively to check whether they match each other.

27. The method of claim 26 further comprising flooding the plurality of link attributes of the two unidirectional links to a entire network when it is determined in the comparing step that the plurality of link attributes of the first unidirectional link and the corresponding link attributes of the second unidirectional link match each other completely.

28. The method of claim 26, further comprising when it is determined in the comparing step that one or more of the plurality of links attributes of the first unidirectional link do not match corresponding link attributes of the second unidirectional link, issuing an alarm or prompt indicating the mismatch of the link attributes according to a type of the mismatched link attributes.

29. The method of claim 26, wherein the plurality of link attributes of the first unidirectional link or the second unidirectional link comprise one or more of a first port identifier, a second port identifier, a signal type, a total bandwidth, an available bandwidth, a supportable maximum contiguous concatenation type, and a protection attribute.

30. The method of claim 29, further comprising when it is determined in the comparing step that one or more of the plurality of links attributes of the first unidirectional link do not match corresponding link attributes of the second unidirectional link, issuing an alarm or prompt indicating the mismatch of the link attributes according to a type of the mismatched link attributes.

31. The method of claim 30, wherein when one or more of the first port identifier, the second port identifier, the signal type, and the protection attribute of the first unidirectional link do not match corresponding attributes of the second unidirectional link, an alarm indicating the mismatched link attributes is issued, and the two unidirectional links are shielded in the network.

32. The method of claim 31, further comprising the step of adjusting the mismatched link attributes by a user to make them match each other, and triggering a verification process on the mismatched link attributes.

33. The method of claim 32, further comprising when it is determined in the triggered verification process that the mismatched link attributes become matching each other, eliminating the alarm, removing the shielding on the two unidirectional links, and flooding the link attributes of the two unidirectional links to the entire network.

34. The method of claim 30, further comprising when it is determined in the comparing step that only one or more of the total bandwidth, the available bandwidth, and the supportable maximum contiguous concatenation type of the first unidirectional link do not match corresponding link attributes of the second unidirectional link, a prompt indicating the mismatch of the link attributes is issued, and the plurality of link attributes of the two unidirectional links are flooded to the entire network.

35. The method of claim 34, further comprising determining whether the first unidirectional link and the second unidirectional link carry unidirectional circuits, and whether available bandwidths and maximum contiguous concatenation types of the unidirectional circuits cause the mismatching;

removing the prompt when the two unidirectional links carry unidirectional circuits and the bandwidths and the maximum contiguous concatenation types thereof cause the mismatching; and

adjusting the mismatched attributes by a user to make them match each other and triggering a verification process on the link attributes, when the two unidirectional links do not carry unidirectional circuits, or although the two unidirectional links carry unidirectional circuits, the bandwidths and the maximum contiguous concatenation types of the unidirectional circuits do not cause the mismatch.

36. The method of claim 35, further comprising when it is determined in the triggered verification process that the mismatched link attributes become matching each other, eliminating the prompt, and flooding the adjusted link attributes which did not match each other previously to the entire network.

37. The method of claim 29, further comprising when it is determined in the comparing step that one or more of the total bandwidth, the available bandwidth, and the supportable maximum contiguous concatenation type of the first unidirectional link do not match corresponding link attributes of the second unidirectional link, determining whether the two unidirectional links carry unidirectional services, and whether bandwidths and maximum contiguous concatenation types of the circuits cause the mismatch;

flooding the plurality of attributes of the two unidirectional links to the entire network when it is determined that the two unidirectional links carry unidirectional services, and the bandwidths and the maximum contiguous concatenation types of the circuits cause the mismatch; and

issuing an alarm indicating the mismatched link attributes and shielding the two unidirectional links, when it is determined that the two unidirectional links do not carry unidirectional circuits, or although the two unidirectional links carry unidirectional circuits, the bandwidths and the maximum contiguous concatenation types of the circuits do not cause the mismatch.

38. The method of claim 37, wherein the step of determining whether the two unidirectional links carry unidirectional services, and whether the bandwidths and the maximum contiguous concatenation types of the circuits cause the mismatch is performed based on information on whether the two unidirectional links carry unidirectional circuits, and the bandwidths and the maximum contiguous concatenation types of the circuits, which are stored in the nodes.

39. The method of claim 37, further comprising adjusting by a user the mismatched link attributes to make them match each other and triggering a verification process on the plurality of link attributes, when receiving the alarm.

40. The method of claim 39, further comprising eliminating the alarm and flooding the plurality of link attributes of the two unidirectional links to the entire network, when it is determined in the triggered verification process that the mismatched link attributes become matching each other.

41. A device for verifying link attributes in a node of an Automatically Switched Optical Network, the node and another node being connected to a first port and a second port of one bidirectional link respectively, the bidirectional link being divided into a first unidirectional link from the first port to the second port and a second unidirectional link from the second port to the first port, the device comprising:

a local link database for storing a plurality of link attributes of the first unidirectional link configured in the node; and

a link management protocol module for receiving a plurality of link attributes of the second unidirectional link configured in the another node from the another node, and comparing the plurality of link attributes of the first unidirectional link stored in the local link database with the received plurality of link attributes of the second unidirectional link respectively to check whether they match each other.

42. The system of claim 41, further comprising a routing protocol module for flooding the plurality of link attributes of the two unidirectional links to the entire network when the link management protocol module determines that the plurality of link attributes of the first unidirectional link and the plurality of link attributes of the second unidirectional link match each other completely.

43. The system of claim 41, further comprising when determining that one or more of the links attributes of the first unidirectional link do not match corresponding link attributes of the second unidirectional link, the link management protocol module issues an alarm or prompt indicating the mismatch of the link attributes according to a type of the mismatched link attributes.

44. The system of claim 41, wherein the plurality of link attributes of the first unidirectional link or the second unidirectional link comprise one or more of a first port identifier, a second port identifier, a signal type, a total bandwidth, an available bandwidth, a supportable maximum contiguous concatenation type, and a protection attribute.

45. The system of claim 44, further comprising an auto-discovery module for configuring the first port identifier, the second port identifier, and the transmitted signal type of the first link by an automatic discovery, and wherein the plurality of link attributes in the local link database includes the link attributes configured by the auto-discovery module, link attributes configured by default, and link attributes configured by a network management system.

46. The system of claim 44, further comprising when determining that one or more of the links attributes of the first unidirectional link do not match corresponding link attributes of the second unidirectional link, the link management protocol module issues an alarm or prompt indicating the mismatch of the link attributes according to a type of the mismatched link attributes.

47. The system of claim 46, wherein when determining one or more of the first port identifier, the second port identifier, the signal type, and the protection attribute of the first unidirectional link do not match corresponding attributes of the second unidirectional link, the link management protocol module issues an alarm indicating the mismatched link attributes, and shields the two unidirectional links in the network.

48. The system of claim 46, wherein when determining that only one or more of the total bandwidth, the available bandwidth, and the supportable maximum contiguous concatenation type of the first unidirectional link do not match corresponding link attributes of the second unidirectional link, the link management protocol module issues a prompt indicating the mismatch of the link attributes, and routing protocol module floods the plurality of link attributes of the two unidirectional links to the entire network.

49. The system of claim 44, wherein when determining that one or more of the link total bandwidth, the link available bandwidth, and the link supportable maximum contiguous concatenation type of the first unidirectional link do not match corresponding link attributes of the second unidirectional link, the link management protocol module determines whether the two unidirectional links carry unidirectional circuits, and whether available bandwidths and maximum contiguous concatenation types of the circuits cause the mismatching;

and

the link management protocol module floods the plurality of attributes of the two unidirectional links to the entire network when determining that the two unidirectional links carry unidirectional services, and the bandwidths and the maximum contiguous concatenation types of the circuits cause the mismatch, and

the link management protocol module issues an alarm indicating the mismatched link attributes and shields the two unidirectional links, when determining that the two unidirectional links do not carry unidirectional circuits, or although the two unidirectional links carry unidirectional circuits, the bandwidths and the maximum contiguous concatenation types of the circuits do not cause the mismatch.

50. The system of claim 49, wherein the link management protocol module determines whether the two unidirectional links carry unidirectional services, and whether the bandwidths and the maximum contiguous concatenation types of the circuits cause the mismatch, based on information on whether the two unidirectional links carry unidirectional circuits, and the bandwidths and the maximum contiguous concatenation types of the circuits, which are stored in the nodes.