System, method and apparatus for message targeting and filtering

• US 20100223349A1
• Filed: 05/07/2010
• Published: 09/02/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 02/03/2004
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Joel Thorson
• Original Assignee: Joel Thorson
• Inventors: Thorson, Joel
• Application Number:
  US12/800,078
• Publication Number:
  US 20100223349A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 709/206
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/107 Computer-aided management of electronic mailing [e-mailing]
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/02 Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0269 based on user profile or attribute
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0282 Rating or review of business operators or products
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 51/212 using filtering or selective blocking
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/0227 Filtering policies mail message filtering H04L51/212
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/102 Entity profiles

Abstract

A system, method and apparatus for message targeting and filtering are provided to deliver bulk messages to demographically selected audiences of willing recipients while preserving each recipient'"'"'s anonymity and control over his private personal data, accomplished by means of a radically distributed database technique in which all operations requiring unencrypted data access are distributed to individual client devices.

Claims

1. A spam deterrence apparatus for use in a secure messaging system, the apparatus comprising:

an individualized message filtering policy mechanism including message filtering policy instructions stored on a data-storage medium, wherein the message filtering policy instructions are configured to be executed on a user'"'"'s private messaging device, and wherein the message filtering policy mechanism further includes message sponsor reputation-relevant criteria established by the subject user;

a message profile mechanism coupled with the message filtering policy mechanism and configured with likewise stored and likewise executable instructions configured, when executed by the messaging device, to compare the message filtering policy mechanism with a message profile of a message received at the messaging device and to assess a level of compliance of the message profile with the message filtering policy,

the message filtering policy mechanism and the message profile mechanism being operatively coupled with one another within the messaging device.

2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the individualized message filtering policy mechanism is stored in encrypted form, and wherein the individualized message filtering policy mechanism remains accessible only by the messaging device when de-encrypted for execution by the messaging device.

3. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising:

a reputation feedback mechanism operatively coupled with the message profile mechanism and further communicatively coupled with a network-based server, the feedback mechanism configured with likewise stored and likewise executable instructions enabling the user to post to the server a reputation rating that includes information relating to the subject user'"'"'s assessment of the honesty and accuracy of sponsor-provided, message content-characterizing information in the message profile of the received message.

4. The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising:

a permission query response mechanism configured with likewise stored and likewise executable instructions, and further configured to one of establish or withhold an individual user'"'"'s informed consent to accept a sponsor'"'"'s message.

5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the spam deterrence apparatus is operatively coupled with a network-based server and includes likewise stored and likewise executable instructions configured to enable the messaging device to transmit to the server a delivery acknowledgement indicating the assessed level of compliance of the message profile with the message filtering policy.

6. A decentralized messaging device-executed spam deterrence method, the method comprising:

storing client user-defined message filtering policies at a device-readable medium of a client, wherein the filtering policies comprise device-executable instructions;

receiving a message delivery permission query at the client, the query including a message profile configured in part with reputation information relating to a sponsor of the message;

comparing the message profile of the query with the client user-defined message filtering policies;

determining a permission status of the message profile relative to the message filtering policies; and

executing a delivery action for the message based at least in part upon the permission status.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the reputation information includes a reputation index corresponding to a sponsor of the message.

8. The method of claim 6, wherein the message filtering policies include a message sponsor reputation index acceptance threshold.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein executing the delivery action includes transmitting a query response from the client to a network-based sponsor accounts database, the query response denying message delivery permission if the sponsor reputation index does not meet the message sponsor reputation index acceptance threshold.

10. The method of claim 6, wherein executing the delivery action includes transmitting a query response from the client to a network-based sponsor accounts database, the query response granting message delivery permission unless the message profile includes one or more characteristics conflicting with the client user-defined message filtering policies.

11. The method of claim 6, further comprising:

transmitting a client user-determined message sponsor-reputation feedback deposit from the client to a network-based sponsor accounts database; and

storing the reputation feedback deposit at the network-based sponsor accounts database.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the stored client user-determined reputation feedback deposit alters a designated message sponsor'"'"'s cumulative reputation index, and wherein the source of the client user-determined reputation feedback deposit is maintained in anonymity by the sponsor accounts database relative to the message sponsor.

13. A secure, client-directed message targeting and filtering system, comprising:

a server coupled with a communications network, the server being configured with a sponsor accounts database, the database including cumulative message sponsor reputation-relevant information, the server further being configured to include the message sponsor reputation-relevant information with a message profile and to transmit the message profile and the message sponsor reputation-relevant information via the network as part of a message delivery permission query; and

device-executable instructions stored at a device-readable storage medium, wherein the instructions are configured to be executed on and by a client messaging device, and wherein the instructions comprise message filtering policies relating to the sponsor reputation-relevant information.

14. The system of claim 13, wherein the message filtering policies remain encrypted except when de-encrypted for use by the client messaging device, and wherein the de-encrypted message filtering policies remain inaccessible to the server.

15. The system of claim 13, further comprising:

message profile assessment instructions stored at a data storage medium and configured to be executed on and by the private messaging device, wherein the assessment instructions are further configured to compare the sponsor reputation-relevant information to the message filtering policies, and wherein the comparing takes place independently from the content of the message.

16. The system of claim 13, wherein the message filtering policies are configurable by a user of the client messaging device to establish message sponsor reputation-based criteria for handling a message delivery permission query received from the server.

17. The system of claim 15, wherein the message profile assessment instructions are further configured to compare message sponsor reputation-relevant information in the message delivery permission query with a client messaging device user-specified reputation threshold of the message filtering policies.

18. The system of claim 16, wherein the handling includes sending to the server a response indicating permission to deliver a message unless the sponsor reputation-relevant information includes one or more characteristics conflicting with the message filtering policies.

19. The system of claim 15, further comprising:

message delivery acknowledgement instructions likewise stored at a data storage medium and configured for execution on and by the client messaging device, the acknowledgement instructions further configured to transmit a delivery acknowledgement message from the client messaging device to the server, the delivery acknowledgement message including information indicating receipt of a message at the client messaging device.

20. The system of claim 19, wherein the delivery acknowledgement message also includes message sponsor reputation-relevant feedback determined by the user of the client messaging device, the message sponsor reputation-relevant feedback relating to a client messaging device user-determined level of correlation between message sponsor-provided information in the message delivery permission query and client-reviewed content of the message, wherein the server is configured to alter the cumulative message sponsor reputation-relevant information stored at the sponsor accounts database relative to the transmitted message sponsor-reputation relevant feedback, and wherein the server is further configured to prevent discovery by the message sponsor of the source of the message sponsor reputation-relevant feedback.