METHOD OF ANALYSIS, DETECTION AND CORRECTION OF FOOD INTOLERANCE IN HUMANS

• US 20100227340A1
• Filed: 09/05/2008
• Published: 09/09/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 09/10/2007
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Immunohealth International, LLC
• Original Assignee: Immunohealth International, LLC
• Inventors: Volkov, Anatoly, Rozenshteyn, Marina, Rozenshteyn, Arkady
• Application Number:
  US12/376,453
• Publication Number:
  US 20100227340A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 435/7.920
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 2800/24 Immunology or allergic disorders SLE G01N2800/104
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 33/6854 Immunoglobulins

Abstract

A method of detection and correction of latent food intolerance (LFI) in humans is described. The method allows, through utilizing a dynamic analysis of a specific test for LFI, assessing the degree of food intolerance and devising an individualized diet that excludes food items which cause latent food intolerance, as well as food items which cause classic allergic reactions. Thus, this method promotes health throughout an individual'"'"'s life by avoiding and correcting the negative effects of food items that act as immune antagonists.

Claims

1. A method of identifying foods that contribute to latent food intolerance in an individual, the method comprising:

defining a group of food items representative of foods available to the individual;

obtaining corresponding food samples from the group of food items;

obtaining a blood sample from the individual;

identifying immunological response values in the blood sample to the food items;

arranging the response values in either descending or ascending order;

defining a function based upon the arranged response values, where the function includes a linear region and a non-linear region; and

identifying the food items corresponding to the response values in the non-linear region, where such food items are foods that contribute to latent food intolerance in the individual.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein identifying immunological response values is performed by mixing blood from the blood sample with a respective food sample in effective portions and measuring such immunological response values.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein identifying immunological response values is performed by conducting an ELISA test.

4. The method of claim 2 wherein identifying immunological response values is based upon assessing changes in the blood sample with respect to immunoglobulin IgG.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the linear region and the non-linear region are separated by a point of demarcation.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein the group of food items representative of foods available to the individual excludes foods that cause relatively immediate allergic reactions in the individual.

7. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

excluding the food items identified as foods that contribute to latent food intolerance in the individual from the group of food items representative of foods available to the individual, to thereby provide a group of foods acceptable to the individual.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein the food items corresponding to the response values in the linear region represent foods acceptable to the individual.

9. The method of claim 7 further comprising:

defining a dietary plan from the group of foods acceptable to the individual.

10. The method of claim 9 wherein after a period of time during which the individual consumes only foods acceptable to the individual and follows the dietary plan, the method of identifying foods that contribute to latent food intolerance is repeated.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein in the identification of foods that contribute to latent food intolerance is a first set of unacceptable foods and in the repeated method of identifying foods that contribute to latent food intolerance, the repeated identification of foods that contribute to latent food intolerance is a second set of unacceptable foods, the method further comprising:

permanently excluding from the individual'"'"'s diet, foods that are in both the first set and the second set of unacceptable foods.

12. A method of identifying foods that contribute to latent food intolerance in an individual and foods to which the individual is tolerant, the method comprising:

defining a group of food items representative of foods available to the individual;

obtaining corresponding food samples from the group of food items;

obtaining a blood sample from the individual;

identifying immunological response values in the blood sample to the food samples;

defining a frequency response distribution of the response values, whereby the frequency response distribution includes a contiguous region and a non-contiguous region;

identifying a first set of food items corresponding to the response values in the contiguous region, where the first set of food items are foods to which the individual is tolerant; and

identifying a second set of food items corresponding to the response values in the non-contiguous region, where the second set of food items are foods that contribute to latent food intolerance in the individual.

13. The method of claim 12 wherein identifying immunological response values is performed by mixing blood from the blood sample with a respective food sample in effective portions and measuring such immunological response values.

14. The method of claim 13 wherein identifying immunological response values is performed by conducting an ELISA test.

15. The method of claim 13 wherein identifying immunological response values is based upon assessing changes in the blood sample with respect to immunoglobulin IgG.

16. The method of claim 12 wherein the contiguous region and the non-contiguous region are separated by a point of demarcation.

17. The method of claim 12 further comprising:

defining a dietary plan from the first set of foods.

18. The method of claim 17 wherein after a period of time during which the individual consumes only foods from the first set and follows the dietary plan, the method of identifying foods that contribute to latent food intolerance is repeated.

19. The method of claim 18 wherein in the repeated method of identifying foods that contribute to latent food intolerance, the repeated identification of foods that contribute to latent food intolerance is a third set of unacceptable foods, the method further comprising:

permanently excluding from the individual'"'"'s diet, foods that are in both the first set and the third set of foods that contribute to latent food intolerances.

20. In a computer system, a method for identifying foods that contribute to latent food intolerance in an individual, the method comprising:

defining a group of food items representative of foods available to the individual;

obtaining immunological response values from the individual for each of the food items in the group;

identifying a demarcation point based upon the immunological response values that separates the group into a first group of foods that contribute to latent food intolerance and a second group of foods to which the individual is tolerant.

21. The method of claim 20 wherein the identifying a demarcation point based upon the immunological response values is performed by:

obtaining a blood sample from the individual;

identifying immunological response values in the blood sample to the food items;

arranging the response values in either descending or ascending order;

defining a function based upon the arranged response values, where the function includes a linear region and a non-linear region, wherein the linear region and non-linear region are separated by the demarcation point.

22. The method of claim 20 wherein the identifying a demarcation point based upon the immunological response values is performed by:

obtaining a blood sample from the individual;

identifying immunological response values in the blood sample to the food samples;

defining a frequency response distribution of the response values, whereby the frequency response distribution includes a contiguous region and a non-contiguous region, wherein the contiguous region and the non-contiguous region are separated by the point of demarcation.

23. The method of claim 20 wherein obtaining immunological response values is performed by mixing blood from a blood sample from the individual with a respective food item in effective portions and measuring such immunological response values.

24. The method of claim 23 wherein obtaining immunological response values is performed by conducting an ELISA test.

25. The method of claim 20 wherein obtaining immunological response values is based upon assessing changes in a blood sample from the individual with respect to immunoglobulin IgG.

26. A computer program product for use in a computer system, the computer program product for implementing a method as recited in claim 20.

27. The computer program product of claim 26, wherein the product includes computer-readable media.