Systems and Methods for Processing Graphics Primitives

• US 20100231585A1
• Filed: 03/13/2009
• Published: 09/16/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 03/13/2009
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Zebra Imaging, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Zebra Imaging, Inc.
• Inventors: Weiblen, Michael E.
• Application Number:
  US12/404,160
• Publication Number:
  US 20100231585A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 345/420
• CPC Class Codes: G03H 1/268 Holographic stereogram
• CPC Class Codes: G03H 2210/441 Numerical processing applied to the object data other than numerical propagation
• CPC Class Codes: G06T 15/20 Perspective computation
• CPC Class Codes: G06T 15/405 using Z-buffer

Abstract

Methods and systems for processing graphics primitives, including point-reflecting a graphics primitive about a point to generate a reflected graphics primitive, the reflected graphics primitive maintaining a depth information of the graphics primitive.

Claims

1. A method for processing graphics primitives, the method comprising point-reflecting a graphics primitive about a point to generate a reflected graphics primitive, the reflected graphics primitive maintaining a depth information of the graphics primitive.

2. The method of claim 1, where point-reflecting the graphics primitive about the point comprises point-reflecting vertices of the graphics primitive about a hogel.

3. The method of claim 2, where the graphics primitive is chosen from a set of one or more graphics primitives, a subset of the one or more graphics primitives located in a primary region, another subset of the one or more graphics primitives located in a secondary region, one of the primary region and the secondary region being primarily in front a hogel surface and another of the primary region and the secondary region being primarily behind the hogel surface, the method further comprising:

determining whether the graphics primitive is, at least partially, in the secondary region; and

point-reflecting the graphics primitive only in response to determining that the graphics primitive is, at least partially, in the secondary region to generate the reflected graphics primitive, the reflected graphics primitive being in the primary region.

4. The method of claim 3, where determining whether the graphics primitive is, at least partially, in the secondary region comprises:

counting the number of vertices of the graphics primitive in the secondary region; and

determining that the graphics primitive is, at least partially, in the secondary region in response to determining that at least one of the vertices of the graphics primitive is in the secondary region.

5. The method of claim 1, where point-reflecting the graphics primitive about the point comprises changing a sign of spatial coordinates of the vertices of the graphics primitive while maintaining a sign and value of a homogeneous coordinate of the vertices of the graphics primitive.

6. The method of claim 3, further comprising:

determining whether the graphics primitive is, at least partially, in a third region, the third region being substantially close to the hogel, the third region being substantially small in the view direction; and

in response to determining that the graphics primitive is, at least partially, in the third region, adding one or more new graphics primitives, the new graphics primitives being in the third region.

7. The method of claim 6, where at least a subset of attributes of the vertices of the new graphics primitives is an interpolation of the attributes of the vertices of the graphics primitive.

8. A system for rendering a hogel, the system comprising:

one or more processors; and

one or more memory units coupled to the one or more processors,

the system being configured to point-reflect a graphics primitive about a point to generate a reflected graphics primitive, the reflected graphics primitive maintaining a depth information of the graphics primitive.

9. The system of claim 8, where the system being configured to point-reflect the graphics primitive about the point comprises the system being configured to point-reflect vertices of the graphics primitive about a hogel.

10. The system of claim 9, where the graphics primitive is chosen from a set of one or more graphics primitives, a subset of the one or more graphics primitives located in a primary region, another subset of the one or more graphics primitives located in a secondary region, one of the primary region and the secondary region being primarily in front a hogel surface and another of the primary region and the secondary region being primarily behind the hogel surface, the system being further configured to:

determine whether the graphics primitive is, at least partially, in the secondary region; and

point-reflect the graphics primitive only in response to determining that the graphics primitive is, at least partially, in the secondary region to generate the reflected graphics primitive, the reflected graphics primitive being in the primary region.

11. The system of claim 10, where the system being configured to determine whether the graphics primitive is, at least partially, in the secondary region comprises the system being configured to:

count the number of vertices of the graphics primitive in the secondary region; and

determine that the graphics primitive is, at least partially, in the secondary region in response to determining that at least one of the vertices of the graphics primitive is in the secondary region.

12. The system of claim 8, where the system being configured to reflect the graphics primitive comprises the system being configured to change the sign of spatial coordinates of the vertices of the graphics primitive while maintaining a sign and a value of a homogeneous coordinate of the vertices of the graphics primitive.

13. The system of claim 10, where the system is further configured to:

determine whether the graphics primitive is, at least partially, in a third region, the third region being substantially close to the hogel, the third region being substantially small in the view direction; and

in response to determining that the graphics primitive is, at least partially, in the third region, add one or more new graphics primitives, the new graphics primitives being in the third region.

14. The system of claim 13, where at least a subset of attributes of the vertices of the new graphics primitives are an interpolation of the attributes of the vertices of the graphics primitive.

15. A computer program product stored on a computer operable medium, the computer program product comprising software code being effective to point-reflect a graphics primitive about a point to generate a reflected graphics primitive, the reflected graphics primitive maintaining a depth information of the graphics primitive.

16. The product of claim 15, where the code being effective to point-reflect the graphics primitive about the point comprises the code being effective to point-reflect vertices of the graphics primitive about a hogel.

17. The product of claim 16, where the graphics primitive is chosen from a set of one or more graphics primitives, a subset of the one or more graphics primitives located in a primary region, another subset of the one or more graphics primitives located in a secondary region, one of the primary region and the secondary region being primarily in front a hogel surface and another of the primary region and the secondary region being primarily behind the hogel surface, the code being further effective to:

determine whether the graphics primitive is, at least partially, in the secondary region; and

point-reflect the graphics primitive only in response to determining that the graphics primitive is, at least partially, in the secondary region to generate the reflected graphics primitive, the reflected graphics primitive being in the primary region.

18. The product of claim 17, where the code being effective to determine whether a graphics primitive from the one or more graphics primitives is, at least partially, in a secondary region comprises the code being effective to:

count the number of vertices of the graphics primitive in the secondary region; and

determine that the graphics primitive is, at least partially, in the secondary region in response to determining that at least one of the vertices of the graphics primitive is in the secondary region.

19. The product of claim 15, where the code being effective to reflect the graphics primitive comprises the code being effective to change the sign of spatial coordinates of the vertices of the graphics primitive while maintaining a sign and a value of a homogeneous coordinate of the vertices of the graphics primitive.

20. The product of claim 17, where the code is further effective to:

determine whether the graphics primitive is, at least partially, in a third region, the third region being substantially close to the hogel, the third region being substantially small in the view direction; and

in response to determining that the graphics primitive is, at least partially, in the third region, add one or more new graphics primitives, the new graphics primitives being in the third region.

21. The product of claim 20, where at least a subset of attributes of the vertices of the new graphics primitives are an interpolation of the attributes of the vertices of the graphics primitive.