Method and system for on-line edit flow peer review

• US 20100235403A1
• Filed: 01/14/2010
• Published: 09/16/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 01/14/2009
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: University of California Berkeley (University of California)
• Original Assignee: University of California Berkeley (University of California)
• Inventors: Ney de Souza, Paulo, Kirby, Robion C.
• Application Number:
  US12/657,297
• Publication Number:
  US 20100235403A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 707/802
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management

Abstract

Methods and systems for journal peer review particularly for managing online peer review transactions over a network or communications medium such as via the Internet. In specific embodiments, that system minimizes or eliminates the need for most participants to remember and/or enter any login or password information. In specific embodiments, a majority of user interactions are prompted by email or text messages that allow for easier user access and acceptance. In specific embodiments, active links are distributed with each message for easy user access. In specific embodiments, automatic conflict checking is performed.

Claims

1. A computer implemented method for collaborative peer review of an unpublished or unapproved submission over a communications network comprising:

using a server computer system and a peer review and edit database to generate a plurality of email messages, said email messages directed to different participants in said peer review and edit process for a paper;

at least a plurality of said email messages containing an active link that is specific to a particular recipient and a particular paper;

transmitting said email messages over a communications channel with an address indication of a recipient;

receiving data over said communications channel indicating a user action and/or activation of said active link;

updating at least one data field in a said database in response to said receiving;

transmitting at least one data file or further email message over said communications channel to said recipient.

3. The method according to claim 1 further comprising:

storing a plurality of data fields indicating a title of said paper, said plurality of data fields comprising fields in at least two different encoding schemes.

4. The method according to claim 1 further comprising:

storing a plurality of email templates;

a plurality of said templates having one or more data merge fields for merging data from said database;

a plurality of said templates having one or more link merge fields for merging an active link generated for a particular recipient for a particular journal.

5. The method according to claim 1 further comprising:

generating one or more unique activation links for a particular recipient for a particular journal.

6. The method according to claim 1 further comprising:

storing one or more unique activation links for a particular recipient for a particular journal in said database.

7. The method according to claim 1 further comprising:

generating one or more unique activation links for a particular recipient for a particular journal for a particular action regarding said edit and peer review process.

8. The method according to claim 1 further comprising:

storing a plurality of data fields indicating a title of said paper, said plurality of data fields comprising fields in at least two different encoding schemes.

9. The method according to claim 1 further comprising:

storing a plurality of email templates;

a plurality of said templates having one or more data merge fields for merging data from said database;

a plurality of said templates having one or more link merge fields for merging an active link generated for a particular recipient for a particular journal.

10. The method according to claim 1 further comprising:

generating one or more unique activation links for a particular recipient for a particular journal.

11. The method according to claim 1 further comprising:

storing one or more unique activation links for a particular recipient for a particular journal in said database.

12. The method according to claim 1 further comprising:

generating one or more, unique activation links for a particular recipient for a particular journal for a particular action regarding said edit and peer review process.

18. A computer readable medium containing computer interpretable instructions that when loaded into an appropriately configured information processing device will cause the device to operate in accordance with claim 1.

2. A computer implemented method for collaborative peer review of an unpublished or unapproved submission over a communications network comprising:

receiving a submission from an author;

storing the submission electronically in a data archive and generating an active link for the submission;

automatically generating a confirmation email to the author using a first template, the confirmation email containing at least one active link by which the author can access the submission and/or access submission status and/or provide revisions or additional information;

automatically notifying a manager that the submission has been received;

assigning an editor to a submission via a communication using a second template, the communication containing at least one active link for the submission;

contacting one or more referees via the data communications network with a referee communication using a third template, the referee communication containing at least one personalized referee active link, the referee communication requesting that the referee agree to review the submission and/or suggest additional referees;

receiving an agreement and/or suggestion from a referee using the personalized referee active link;

transmitting one or more confirmation and/or reminder emails to an agreeing referee using at least a fourth template, at least some of said emails containing the personalized referee active link;

receiving an evaluation from uploaded by a referee using the personalized referee active link;

notifying the editor that one or more evaluations have been uploaded;

notifying the author using a fifth template of a decision and/or further actions that need to be taken by the author with a communication containing at least one active link,

13. A system for a peer review and edit process for publications comprising:

a server computer system;

a peer review and edit database;

a controller in said server computer system programmed to generate a plurality of messages, said messages directed to different participants in said peer review and edit process for a paper;

at least a plurality of said messages containing an active link that is specific to a particular recipient and a particular paper;

a communications interface for transmitting said messages over a communications channel with an address indication of a recipient and for receiving data over said communications channel indicating a user action and/or activation of said active link;

wherein said controller updates at least one data field in a said database in response to said receiving;

wherein said controller transmits at least one data file or further message over said communications channel to said recipient.

14. The system of claim 13 wherein said at least one data file comprises data that can be rendered as a graphical user interface at a client system with an appropriately configured browser application.

15. The system of claim 13 further comprising:

one or more conflict checking tools, each tool comprising;

a rule set for detecting a conflict using author data and one or more additional databases;

an interface to one or more additional databases;

an output for outputting conflict indication data.

16. The system of claim 13 further comprising:

a questionnaire regarding specifics of a particular review process;

wherein a review flow of a system can be modified as a result of responses to said questionnaire.

17. A computer readable medium containing computer interpretable instructions describing a circuit layout for an integrated circuit that, when constructed according to said descriptions, will configure a circuit to embody the system described in claim 13.