AUTOMATIC WALK-AWAY DETECTION

• US 20100245038A1
• Filed: 03/25/2009
• Published: 09/30/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 03/25/2009
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Lear Corporation
• Original Assignee: Lear Corporation
• Inventors: Ghabra, Riad, King, Ronald O., Nantz, John, Christenson, Keith A., Vartanian, Bryan
• Granted Patent: US 8,203,424 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 340/5.610
• CPC Class Codes: G07C 2009/00793 by Hertzian waves
• CPC Class Codes: G07C 2209/08 With time considerations, e.g. temporary activation, valid time window or time limitations
• CPC Class Codes: G07C 2209/62 Comprising means for indicating the status of the lock
• CPC Class Codes: G07C 9/00309 operated with bidirectional data transmission between data carrier and locks

Abstract

A method and system for walk-away locking of a vehicle. The vehicle may be automatically locked when an occupant walks away from the vehicle in a passive manner. The automatic locking capabilities may be incorporated within an energy conservation strategy that allows one or more vehicle components and a fob to enter a sleep mode or otherwise become inactive at particular intervals when signals necessary to automatically locking the vehicle are less likely.

Claims

1. An automatic walk-away detection system for use with a vehicle comprising:

a fob configured to passively emit an in-zone signal upon receipt of a query signal and to passively emit an out-of-zone signal when the query signal is not received within an identified period of a repeatedly recurring timing loop; and

a controller within the vehicle configured to issue the query signal at a beginning of the identified period and to automatically lock the vehicle depending on whether the fob is considered to have walked away from the vehicle, wherein the controller considers the fob to have walked away from the vehicle upon receipt of the out-of-zone signal or upon failure to receive the in-zone signal during the identified time period.

2. The system of claim 1 wherein the fob includes a timer configured to time the repeatedly recurring timing loop and to wake the fob from a sleep mode before the identified period begins in order for the fob to detect the query signal or emit the out-of-zone signal.

3. The system of claim 2 wherein the timer places the fob into the sleep mode upon completion of the identified period, wherein the fob is unable to passively emit the in-zone or out-of-zone signals when in sleep mode.

4. The system of claim 2 wherein the controller transmits wireless signals to the fob that instruct the timer of the identified period.

5. The system of claim 4 wherein the controller changes the duration of the identified period depending on whether the in-zone signal is received.

6. The system of claim 1 wherein the controller re-issues the query signal in order to confirm the fob has walked away from the vehicle upon a failure of the fob to respond to the re-issued query signal.

7. The system of claim 1 wherein the fob only issues the out-of-zone signal one time for each time the fob is considered to have walked away from the vehicle.

20. The method of claim 8 further comprising repeatedly cycling through the transmission of the fob polling signal and the following first, second, and third operating modes according the order specified in claim 1 if the vehicle remains unlocked, including increasing or decreasing one or more of the first, second, or third time period when repeating at least one of the cycles.

8. A method of supporting a smart entry system (SES) and remote keyless entry (RKE) while conserving battery life by selectively activating and deactivating a receiver used within a vehicle by a controller to capture SES and RKE related wireless signals, the method comprising:

at a first instance in time, transmitting a fob polling signal from the vehicle;

for a first period of time occurring after the first instance, operating the receiver in a first operating mode characterized as a SES mode, the receiver being continuously active and configured to process only SES signals received from the fob when in the first operating mode;

for a second period of time occurring after the first period, operating the receiver in a second operating mode characterized as a RKE mode, the receiver being continuously active and configured to process only RKE signals received from the fob when in the second operating mode; and

for a third period of time occurring after the second period, operating the receiver in a third operating mode characterized as a an RKE polling mode, the receiver alternating between active and inactive states when in the third operating mode such that the receiver is only able to process the RKE signals when active.

9. The method of claim 8 further comprising instructing the fob to enter a sleep mode upon expiration of the first period of time and to awake from the sleep mode upon expiration of the third period of time.

10. The method of claim 8 further comprising identifying a next transmission of the fob polling signal, the identified next transmission indicating a second instance in time when another fob polling signal will be transmitted from the receiver.

11. The method of claim 10 further comprising identifying the next transmission for another fob polling signal with a timer included within the fob.

12. The method of claim 10 further comprising identifying the next transmission for another fob polling signal from data included within a prior polling signal.

13. The method of claim 10 further comprising instructing the fob to enter a sleep mode for at least a portion of time occurring after the polling signal and before the another polling signal.

14. The method of claim 10 further comprising instructing the fob to transmit an out-of-zone SES presence signal if the fob fails to receive the another polling signal transmitted at the second instance or other pre-determined instance(s) in time.

15. The method of claim 8 further comprising locking the vehicle if an SES presence response is not received from the fob during the SES mode.

16. The method of claim 8 further comprising locking the vehicle if an SES presence response indicates the fob is beyond a predefined distance from the vehicle.

17. The method of claim 8 further comprising transmitting the fob polling signal at the first instance of time from a first side of the car.

18. The method of claim 17 further comprising transmitting another fob polling signal at a second instance of time from a second side of the car if an SES presence response is not received from the fob in response to the fob polling signal transmitted at the first instance in time.

19. The method of claim 18 further comprising locking the vehicle if the SES presence response is not received from the fob in response to either one of the fob polling signals sent at the first and second instances in time.