Schema Validation for Submissions of Digital Assets for Network-Based Distribution

• US 20100251099A1
• Filed: 03/26/2009
• Published: 09/30/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 03/26/2009
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Apple Inc.
• Original Assignee: Apple Inc.
• Inventors: Jimenez, Juan Carlos, Makower, David
• Application Number:
  US12/412,161
• Publication Number:
  US 20100251099A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 715/237
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 40/143 Markup, e.g. Standard Generalized Markup Language [SGML] or Document Type Definition [DTD]
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 40/226 Validation
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management

Abstract

Methods and systems for validating digital asset submissions to a network-based digital asset distribution site are disclosed. The validation can be performed in an automated (i.e., computer-implemented) manner at the network-based digital asset distribution site. In one embodiment, the validation of digital asset submissions can include at least schema validation, such as multi-pass schema validation. Upon successful validation, the corresponding digital asset submissions can be made available for online purchase and distribution.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method for validating digital asset packages submitted to a network-based distribution system, said method comprises:

(a) receiving a submission request from a submitter, the submission request including at least a digital asset package;

(b) determining whether the digital asset package satisfies a less stringent schema;

(c) determining whether the digital asset package satisfies a more stringent schema; and

(d) accepting the digital asset package at the network-based distribution system if said determining (b) determines that the digital asset package satisfies the less stringent schema;

(e) providing a warning to the submitter if said determining (c) determines that the digital asset package does not satisfy the more stringent schema.

2. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1, wherein said method further comprises:

(f) declining the digital asset package at the network-based distribution system if said determining (c) determines that the digital asset package does not satisfy the less stringent schema.

3. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1, wherein the digital asset package is a digital media package.

4. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1, wherein the warning comprises an indication of why the digital asset package does not does not satisfy the more stringent schema.

5. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1, wherein the warning comprises an indication of at least one error and its position within the digital asset package.

6. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1,

wherein the network-based distribution system includes a master schema with certain schema items being mandatory and with other schema items being optional, and

wherein the less stringent schema and the more stringent schema are derived from the master schema.

7. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1, wherein the less stringent schema and the more stringent schema are defined in a markup language.

8. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1, wherein the markup language comprises XML.

9. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1,

wherein the network-based distribution system includes a base schema, and

wherein the less stringent schema is derived from the base schema using at least one alteration rule.

10. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1,

wherein the network-based distribution system includes a base schema, and

wherein the more stringent schema is derived from the base schema using at least one alteration rule.

11. A schema validation system, comprising:

a first set of schema rules;

a second set of schema rules; and

a schema validation module configured to receive a submitted digital asset package having data provided in a structured format, to compare the structured format of the data of the submitted digital asset with both the first set of schema rules and the second set of schema rules, and to validate the structured format of the data based on the comparison of the structured format of the data of the submitted digital asset with both the first set of schema rules and the second set of schema rules.

12. A schema validation system as recited in claim 11, wherein the first set of schema rules is a less stringent than the second set of schema rules.

13. A schema validation system as recited in claim 11, wherein said schema validation system further comprises:

a base schema including at least a plurality of schema rules, wherein certain of the plurality of schema rules are mandatory and others are optional, and

wherein the first set of schema rules and the second set of schema rules are derived from the base schema.

14. A schema validation system as recited in claim 13, wherein the first set of schema rules is a less stringent than the second set of schema rules.

15. A schema validation system as recited in claim 12, wherein schema validation module validates the structured format of the data such that (i) the submitted digital asset package is deemed to have a valid schema if the structured format of the data of the submitted digital asset satisfies the first set of schema rules;

and (ii) a warning notification is sent concerning the schema of the submitted digital asset package if the structured format of the data of the submitted digital asset does not satisfy the second set of schema rules.

16. A method for performing schema validation, said method comprising:

maintaining a base schema including at least a plurality of schema rules, wherein certain of the plurality of schema rules are mandatory and others are optional;

deriving a first set of schema rules and a second set of schema rules from the base schema; and

performing schema validation on a submitted digital asset package using the first set of schema rules and the second set of schema rules.

17. A method as recited in claim 16,

wherein the submitted digital asset package has data provided in a structured format, and

wherein said performing of the schema validation comprises:

comparing the structured format of the data of the submitted digital asset with both the first set of schema rules and the second set of schema rules; and

validating the structured format of the data based on the comparison of the structured format of the data of the submitted digital asset with both the first set of schema rules and the second set of schema rules,

18. A method as recited in claim 17, wherein the first set of schema rules is a less stringent than the second set of schema rules.

19. A computer readable medium including at least computer program code executable by a computer stored thereon, said computer readable medium comprising:

computer program code for receiving a submission request from a submitter, the submission request including at least a digital asset package;

computer program code for determining whether the digital asset package satisfies a first schema;

computer program code for accepting the digital asset package at the network-based distribution system if said computer program code for determining determines that the digital asset package satisfies the first schema;

computer program code for determining whether the digital asset package satisfies a second schema; and

computer program code for providing a warning to the submitter if said computer program code for determining determines that the digital asset package does not satisfy the second schema.

20. A computer readable medium as recited in claim 19, wherein the first schema is a less stringent schema than the second schema.

21. A computer readable medium as recited in claim 19, wherein said computer readable medium further comprises:

computer program code for declining the digital asset package at the network-based distribution system if said computer program code for determining determines that the digital asset package does not satisfy the less stringent schema.

22. A computer readable medium as recited in claim 19, wherein the digital asset package is a digital media package.