Heading Error Removal System for Tracking Devices

• US 20100256939A1
• Filed: 04/03/2009
• Published: 10/07/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 04/03/2009
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Board of Regents of the University of Michigan (University of Michigan)
• Original Assignee: Board of Regents of the University of Michigan (University of Michigan)
• Inventors: Borenstein, Johann
• Application Number:
  US12/418,539
• Publication Number:
  US 20100256939A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 702/96
• CPC Class Codes: G01C 21/06 involving measuring of drift angle; involving correction for drift
• CPC Class Codes: G01C 21/188 for accumulated errors, e.g. by coupling inertial systems with absolute positioning systems
• CPC Class Codes: G01C 22/006 Pedometers

Abstract

Systems are able to reduce or remove slowly-varying drift errors, such as heading errors and rate of rotation errors, to correct the measurements from tracking devices. The systems may be used to remove the slow varying drift errors for gyroscopic tracking device sensors, or other types of sensors used for determining heading, rates of rotation, or position. The systems may be employed in personal dead reckoning systems, or other personnel tracking device, as well as in vehicle tracking devices. The system uses heuristic assumptions to correct for these drift errors, via a feedback loop control having an accumulator responsive to changes in output signals. The accumulator is able to produce a signal that over time compensates for the inherent drift errors on those output signals. In some examples, that feedback loop control can be adjusted to compensate from deviations from those heuristic assumptions, such as swaying, curving, or turning.

Claims

1. A method for removing drift error from a tracking device having a sensor assembly to measure rate of rotation and heading for the tracking device, the method comprising:

removing static drift error from the measured rate of rotation to produce a normalized rate of rotation, wherein the normalized rate of rotation includes a drift error component that varies during operation of the tracking device;

applying the normalized rate of rotation to a closed loop feedback control that includes an accumulator for accumulating error values corresponding to a difference between the normalized rate of rotation and a baseline rate of rotation;

the closed loop feedback control producing an integrator signal that counteracts the effects of the drift error component of the normalized rate of rotation; and

correcting the normalized rate of rotation by applying the integrator signal to the normalized rate of rotation signal to produce a corrected rate of rotation signal.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the baseline rate of rotation is set to zero.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining the static drift error by measuring the static drift error at an initial non-moving state of the tracking device.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising supplying the normalized rate of rotation and the baseline rate of rotation to a comparator that produces a feedback loop error signal and supplying that feedback loop error signal to the accumulator, wherein the accumulator accumulates the error to produce the integrator signal.

5. The method of claim 4, further comprising determining whether the feedback loop error signal represents a positive drift error or a negative drift error, and if a positive drive error increasing the integrator signal by an increment amount, and if a negative drive error decreasing the integrator signal by the increment amount.

6. The method of claim 5, further comprising adjusting the magnitude of the increment amount.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the normalized rate of rotation are either positive indicating a first turn type or negative indicating a second turn type, the method further comprising adjusting the magnitude of the increment amount in response to the length of time that consecutive normalized rates of rotation from the tracking device have the same sign, either positive or negative.

8. The method of claim 7, further comprising reducing the increment amount when a threshold number of consecutive normalized rates of rotation have the same sign, either positive or negative.

9. The method of claim 6, further comprising adjusting the increment amount in a manner inversely proportional to the magnitude of the normalized rate of rotation.

10. The method of claim 1, further comprising applying a low pass filtering to the normalized rate of rotation before supplying the normalized rate of rotation to the closed loop feedback control.

11. The method of claim 1, further comprising applying a double low pass filtering to the normalized rate of rotation before supplying the normalized rate of rotation to the closed loop feedback control.

12. The method of claim 11, further comprising applying a delagging process to the corrected rate of rotation.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein the sensor is a gyroscopic device.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein the tracking device is a personal dead reckoning system.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein the tracking device is a vehicle tracking device.

16. A method for removing drift error from a tracking device having a sensor assembly to measure rate of rotation and heading for the tracking device, the method comprising:

removing static drift error from the measured rate of rotation to produce a normalized rate of rotation, wherein the normalized rate of rotation includes a drift error component that varies during operation of the tracking device;

integrating the normalized rate of rotation to produce a feedback heading;

supplying the feedback heading to a closed loop feedback control that is to perform a low pass filtering on the feedback heading and that is to map the feedback heading onto one of a plurality of dominant directions to form a mapped feedback heading;

an accumulator within the closed loop feedback control accumulating error values corresponding to a difference between the mapped feedback heading and a baseline heading;

the closed loop feedback control producing an integrator signal that counteracts the effects of the drift error component of the normalized rate of rotation;

correcting the normalized rate of rotation by applying the integrator signal to the normalized rate of rotation signal to produce a corrected rate of rotation signal; and

integrating the corrected rate of rotation to produce a corrected heading.

17. The method of claim 16, wherein the baseline heading is set to a value between at least two of the plurality of dominant directions.

18. The method of claim 17, further comprising mapping the feedback heading onto one of the plurality of dominant directions by supplying the feedback heading to a controller that performs a MOD function on the feedback heading, where the MOD function is expressed as:

MOD(ψ

,Δ

)=ψ

−

Δ

INT(ψ

/Δ

)

where ψ

is one of the plurality of dominant directions and Δ

is the baseline heading, and wherein INT(ψ

/Δ

) is a function that rounds ψ

/Δ

down to the nearest integer.

19. The method of claim 16, further comprising determining the static drift error by measuring the static drift error at an initial non-moving state of the tracking device.

20. The method of claim 16, further comprising:

supplying the mapped feedback heading and the baseline heading to a comparator that produces a feedback loop error signal; and

supplying that feedback loop error signal to the accumulator, wherein the accumulator accumulates the error signal to produce the integrator signal.

21. The method of claim 20, further comprising determining whether the feedback loop error signal represents a positive drift error or a negative drift error, and if a positive drift error increasing the integrator signal by an increment amount, and if a negative drive error decreasing the integrator signal by the increment amount.

22. The method of claim 16, wherein the sensor is a gyroscopic device.

23. The method of claim 16, wherein the tracking device is a personal dead reckoning system.

24. The method of claim 16, wherein the tracking device is a vehicle tracking device.

25. A tracking device comprising:

a sensor assembly to measure rate of rotation and heading for the tracking device;

a memory for storing measured rate of rotation and heading data; and

a controller to execute computer-executable instructions for,

removing static drift error from the measured rate of rotation to produce a normalized rate of rotation, wherein the normalized rate of rotation includes a drift error component that varies during operation of the tracking device;

integrating the normalized rate of rotation to produce a feedback heading;

supplying the feedback heading to a closed loop feedback control that is to perform a low pass filtering on the feedback heading and that is to map the feedback heading onto one of a plurality of dominant directions to form a mapped feedback heading;

an accumulator within the closed loop feedback control accumulating error values corresponding to a difference between the mapped feedback heading and a baseline heading;

the closed loop feedback control producing an integrator signal that counteracts the effects of the drift error component of the normalized rate of rotation;

correcting the normalized rate of rotation by applying the integrator signal to the normalized rate of rotation signal to produce a corrected rate of rotation signal; and

integrating the corrected rate of rotation to produce a corrected heading.

26. The apparatus of claim 25, wherein the controller is to execute computer-executable instructions such that the baseline heading is set to a value between at least two of the plurality of dominant directions.

27. The apparatus of claim 25, wherein the controller is to execute computer-executable instructions for mapping the feedback heading onto one of the plurality of dominant directions by performing a MOD function on the feedback heading, where the MOD function is expressed as:

MOD(ψ

,Δ

)=ψ

−

Δ

INT(ψ

/Δ

)

where ψ

is one of the plurality of dominant directions and Δ

is the baseline heading, and wherein INT(ψ

/Δ

) is a function that rounds ψ

/Δ

down to the nearest integer.

28. The apparatus of claim 25, wherein the controller is to execute computer-executable instructions for determining the static drift error by measuring the static drift error at an initial non-moving state of the tracking device.

29. The apparatus of claim 25, wherein the controller is to execute computer-executable instructions for:

supplying the mapped feedback heading and the baseline heading to a comparator that produces a feedback loop error signal; and

supplying that feedback loop error signal to the accumulator, wherein the accumulator accumulates the error signal to produce the integrator signal.

30. The apparatus of claim 29, wherein the controller is to execute computer-executable instructions for determining whether the feedback loop error signal represents a positive drift error or a negative drift error, and if a positive drift error increasing the integrator signal by an increment amount, and if a negative drive error decreasing the integrator signal by the increment amount.

31. The apparatus of claim 25, further comprising an inertial measurement unit containing the sensor, and wherein the sensor is a gyroscopic device.

32. The apparatus of claim 25, wherein the tracking device is a personal dead reckoning system.

33. The apparatus of claim 25, wherein the tracking device is a vehicle tracking device.

34. A tracking device comprising:

a sensor assembly to measure rate of rotation and heading for the tracking device;

a memory for storing measured rate of rotation and heading data; and

a controller to execute computer-executable instructions for,

removing static drift error from the measured rate of rotation to produce a normalized rate of rotation, wherein the normalized rate of rotation includes a drift error component that varies during operation of the tracking device;

applying the normalized rate of rotation to a closed loop feedback control that includes an accumulator for accumulating error values corresponding to a difference between the normalized rate of rotation and a baseline rate of rotation;

the closed loop feedback control producing an integrator signal that counteracts the effects of the drift error component of the normalized rate of rotation; and

correcting the normalized rate of rotation by applying the integrator signal to the normalized rate of rotation signal to produce a corrected rate of rotation signal.

35. The apparatus of claim 34, wherein the controller is to execute computer-executable instructions such that the baseline rate of rotation is set to zero.

36. The apparatus of claim 34, wherein the controller is to execute computer-executable instructions for determining the static drift error by measuring the static drift error at an initial non-moving state of the tracking device.

37. The apparatus of claim 34, wherein the controller is to execute computer-executable instructions for supplying the normalized rate of rotation and the baseline rate of rotation to a comparator that produces a feedback loop error signal and supplying that feedback loop error signal to the accumulator, wherein the accumulator accumulates the error to produce the integrator signal.

38. The apparatus of claim 37, wherein the controller is to execute computer-executable instructions for determining whether the feedback loop error signal represents a positive drift error or a negative drift error, and if a positive drive error increasing the integrator signal by an increment amount, and if a negative drive error decreasing the integrator signal by the increment amount.

39. The apparatus of claim 38, wherein the controller is to execute computer-executable instructions for adjusting the magnitude of the increment amount.

40. The apparatus of claim 39, wherein the normalized rate of rotation are either positive indicating a first turn type or negative indicating a second turn type, wherein the controller is to execute computer-executable instructions for adjusting the magnitude of the increment amount in response to the length of time that consecutive normalized rates of rotation from the tracking device have the same sign, either positive or negative.

41. The apparatus of claim 40, wherein the controller is to execute computer-executable instructions for reducing the increment amount when a threshold number of consecutive normalized rates of rotation have the same sign, either positive or negative.

42. The apparatus of claim 40, wherein the controller is to execute computer-executable instructions for adjusting the increment amount in a manner inversely proportional to the magnitude of the normalized rate of rotation.

43. The apparatus of claim 34, wherein the controller is to execute computer-executable instructions for applying a low pass filtering to the normalized rate of rotation before supplying the normalized rate of rotation to the closed loop feedback control.

44. The apparatus of claim 34, wherein the controller is to execute computer-executable instructions for applying a double low pass filtering to the normalized rate of rotation before supplying the normalized rate of rotation to the closed loop feedback control.

45. The apparatus of claim 34, wherein the controller is to execute computer-executable instructions for applying a delagging process to the corrected rate of rotation.

46. The apparatus of claim 34, further comprising an inertial measurement unit containing the sensor, and wherein the sensor is a gyroscopic device.

47. The apparatus of claim 34, wherein the tracking device is a personal dead reckoning system.

48. The apparatus of claim 34, wherein the tracking device is a vehicle tracking device.