SERVICE ORIENTATED COMPUTER SYSTEM WITH MULTIPLE QUALITY OF SERVICE CONTROLS

• US 20100257009A1
• Filed: 04/01/2009
• Published: 10/07/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 04/01/2009
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: National ICT Australia Limited
• Original Assignee: National ICT Australia Limited
• Inventors: Liu, Yan, Tan, Minan
• Application Number:
  US12/416,730
• Publication Number:
  US 20100257009A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/8
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 19/41875 characterised by quality surveillance of production
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 2219/32136 Web service oriented architecture for manufacturing and automation
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 2219/32177 Computer assisted quality surveyance, caq
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/546 Message passing systems or structures, e.g. queues
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06312 Adjustment or analysis of established resource schedule, e.g. resource or task levelling, or dynamic rescheduling
• CPC Class Codes: Y02P 90/02 Total factory control, e.g. smart factories, flexible manufacturing systems [FMS] or integrated manufacturing systems [IMS]

Abstract

The invention concerns service orientated computer system comprised of services, such as web services, connected by an event-driven middleware. In particular, the invention concerns adaptive and self-managing systems that can adapt their behaviour based on components that monitor the behaviour of the system and provide feedback. The system attempts to meet a quality of service based on multiple quality controls 26, 70, 72 where each quality control 26 is associated with one or more components 24. The controls 26 receive input messages from associated components 24 and execute 22 a process model 20 associated with the quality control 26 based on the received messages to send messages to the one or more associated components 24 to change the behaviour of the components 24. Communication between all components 24 is performed by sending and receiving messages. The controls 26 define the logic for the sending of these messages that in turn change the behaviour of the system. The controls 26 provide a layer of abstraction that allows loose coupling between the controls 26 and components 24. This avoids the disadvantages associated with hard coding of logic within components 24. Aspects of the invention include a computer system, method, and software.

Claims

1. A service orientated computer system comprised of services connected by an event-driven message based middleware, the middleware further comprising:

multiple components that function to sense messages and effect delivery of messages within the middleware and between services;

a set of controls to automatically change the behaviour of the system to meet a quality of service, the set of controls comprising;

multiple quality controls each directed to one or more quality of service metrics and associated with one or more components, where each quality control is modelled as an executable process model that receives input messages from one or more associated components and, based on the received messages and the executable process model, operates to automatically send messages to the one or more associated components to change the behaviour of the one or more associated components; and

a process engine to execute the executable process models of the controls.

2. A service orientated computer system according to claim 1, wherein the model of the quality control is comprised of states and transitions having associated action code that when executed by the process engine changes the behaviour of the one or more associated components.

3. A service orientated computer system according to claim 1, wherein one or more components have control parameters and the message sent to a component alters a control parameter of the component.

4. A service orientated computer system according to claim 1, wherein the set of controls further comprises:

one or more coordinating controls that are associated with one or more quality controls, where each coordinating control is modelled as an executable process model to automatically coordinate dependencies between the two or more associated quality controls.

5. A service orientated computer system according to claim 4, wherein the coordinating controls receive status messages from each of the associated quality controls and coordinates dependencies between these quality controls based on the received status messages and executable process model. The status messages may be received by an aggregation sensor component of the coordination control.

6. A service orientated computer system according to claim 4, wherein the coordination control operates to change the behaviour of the system by sending a message to a component associated with a quality control that is in turn associated with the coordination control in order to change the behaviour of the one or more associated components.

7. A service orientated computer system according to claim 6, wherein the message sent from a coordination control to a component has precedence over a message sent from a quality control to the same component.

8. A service orientated computer system according to claim 5, wherein a first quality control is directed to overloading as the quality of service metric and a second quality control is directed to failover as the quality of service metric.

9. A service orientated computer system according to claim 8, wherein the coordinating control is associated with the first and second quality control, and the coordinating control receives the status message from the second quality control indicating that overload has occurred and then automatically sends a message to a component associated with the overload control to cause the slowing down the acceptance rate of new requests to a service until the failover operations complete.

10. A service orientated computer system according to claim 1, wherein the components are sensors, routers, throttlers and/or multicasters.

11. A service orientated computer system according to claim 1, wherein the models are in business process modelling (BPM) language.

12. A service orientated computer system according to claim 1, wherein each coordinating control represents a unique cross cutting concern of the associated quality controls.

13. A service orientated computer system according to claim 1, wherein the services are spread across multiple organization boundaries and the components, controls and processing engine are deployed at service boundary.

14. A service orientated computer system according to claim 1, wherein the event-driven middleware includes an Enterprise Service Bus (ESB).

15. A service orientated computer system according to claim 1, wherein the services are hosted on a distributed computer network or on Internet where any host operates using a Cloud platform.

16. A service orientated computer system according to claim 1, wherein services are web based, and are accessed by a unique identity.

17. A method of automatically changing the behaviour a service orientated computer system comprised of services connected by an event-driven message based middleware to meet a quality of service, the method comprising executing at run time multiple quality controls, each quality control directed to one or more quality of service metrics and associated with one or more components that function to sense messages and effect delivery of messages within the middleware and between services, by each quality control:

receiving input messages from one or more associated components;

executing a process model associated with the quality control based on the received messages to send messages to one or more associated components to change the behaviour of the components.

18. The method according to claim 17, wherein the method further comprises the steps of the quality controls sending status messages and executing at run time coordinating controls that automatically coordinate dependencies between two or more associated quality controls.

19. The method according to claim 18, where coordinating dependencies between two or more associated quality controls comprises each coordinating control:

receiving the status messages from the one or more associated quality controls;

executing a process model associated with the coordinating control based on the received status messages to send messages to one or more associated components of the associated quality controls to change the behaviour of the components.

20. Software, that is computer executable instructions stored on a computer readable medium that when installed causes a computer system to perform the method of claim 17.