Method for Time-Evolving Rectilinear Contours Representing Photo Masks

• US 20100275176A1
• Filed: 06/04/2010
• Published: 10/28/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 04/06/2003
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: KLA Corporation
• Original Assignee: Luminescent Technologies, Inc. (KLA Corporation)
• Inventors: Osher, Stanley, Abrams, Daniel, Peng, Danping
• Granted Patent: US 7,992,109 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 716/52
• CPC Class Codes: G03F 1/36 Masks having proximity correction features; Preparation thereof, e.g. optical proximity correction [OPC] design processes

Abstract

Photomask patterns are represented using contours defined by level-set functions. Given target pattern, contours are optimized such that defined photomask, when used in photolithographic process, prints wafer pattern faithful to target pattern. Optimization utilizes “merit function” for encoding aspects of photolithographic process, preferences relating to resulting pattern (e.g. restriction to rectilinear patterns), robustness against process variations, as well as restrictions imposed relating to practical and economic manufacturability of photomasks.

Claims

1-16. -16. (canceled)

17. A computer-implemented method for determining a mask pattern to be used on a photo-mask in a photolithographic process, wherein the photo-mask has a plurality of distinct types of regions having distinct optical properties, comprising:

providing a first mask pattern that includes a plurality of distinct types of regions corresponding to the distinct types of regions of the photo-mask;

using a processor to calculate a gradient of a function, wherein the function depends on the first mask pattern and an estimate of a wafer pattern that results from the photolithographic process utilizing at least a portion of the first mask pattern, and wherein the gradient is a closed-form expression; and

generating a second mask pattern based, at least in part, on the gradient of the function.

18. The computer-implemented method of claim 17, wherein the gradient corresponds to a Frechet derivative.

19. The computer-implemented method of claim 17, wherein the gradient is calculated without determining the function.

20. The computer-implemented method of claim 17, wherein the output of the function further depends on at least a portion of a target pattern that is to be printed by the photo-mask during the photolithographic process.

21. The computer-implemented method of claim 20, wherein another target pattern is modified to produce the target pattern.

22. The computer-implemented method of claim 20, further comprising converting a document that includes a polygon-based representation of the target pattern into the target pattern.

23. The computer-implemented method of claim 20, further comprising converting a document that includes an edge-based representation of the target pattern into the target pattern.

24. The computer-implemented method of claim 17, wherein the function depends, at least in part, on a model of the photolithographic process, wherein the model includes a resist model.

25. The computer-implemented method of claim 24, wherein the resist model includes simulated development of a resist.

26. The computer-implemented method of claim 17, wherein the generating involves:

modifying a first representation of the first mask pattern to produce a second representation of the second mask pattern in accordance with the gradient; and

extracting a second mask pattern from the second representation.

27. The computer-implemented method of claim 26, wherein the second mask pattern is piece-wise rectilinear.

28. The computer-implemented method of claim 26, wherein the first representation is a distance function in which a value of the first representation corresponds to a distance from a nearest contour in a plane of the first mask pattern.

29. The computer-implemented method of claim 28, wherein the first representation has a pre-determined value on a contour in the plane.

30. The computer-implemented method of claim 29, further comprising adjusting the second representation such that it is a distance function in which a value of the second representation corresponds to a distance from a nearest contour in a plane of the second mask pattern.

31. The computer-implemented method of claim 17, further comprising combining the second mask pattern with a third mask pattern, wherein the third mask pattern is determined in accordance with pre-determined optical-proximity-correction rules.

32. The computer-implemented method of claim 17, wherein the function is a merit function that assigns different relative weights to different regions of the first mask pattern.

33. The computer-implemented method of claim 17, wherein the function is a merit function that includes estimate of a process window corresponding to the photolithographic process.

34. The computer-implemented method of claim 17, wherein the function is a merit function that includes a model of the photolithographic process that includes out-of-focus conditions.

35. The computer-implemented method of claim 17, wherein the function is a merit function that indicates a degree of desirability of the first mask pattern.

36. The computer-implemented method of claim 17, wherein the gradient is calculated in accordance with a formula obtained by taking a derivative of the function.