Characterizing Spatial Variability of Surface Waves In Seismic Processing

• US 20100286919A1
• Filed: 01/26/2009
• Published: 11/11/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 03/28/2008
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Sunwoong Lee, Warren S. Ross
• Original Assignee: Sunwoong Lee, Warren S. Ross
• Inventors: Ross, Warren S., Lee, Sunwoong
• Granted Patent: US 8,483,009 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 702/16
• CPC Class Codes: G01V 1/28 Processing seismic data, e.g. for interpretation or for event detection G01V1/48 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G01V 2210/20 Trace signal pre-filtering to select, remove or transform specific events or signal components, i.e. trace-in/trace-out

Abstract

Embodiments use seismic processing methods that account for the spatial variability of surface wave velocities. Embodiments analyze surface wave properties by rapidly characterizing spatial variability of the surface waves in the seismic survey data (302). Filtering criteria are formed using the spatial variability of the surface waves (204). The filtering criteria can then be used to remove at least a portion of the surface waves from the seismic data (206, 319). The rapid characterization involves estimating a local group velocity of the surface waves by cross-correlation of the analytic signals (302).

Claims

1. A method of processing exploration seismic survey data from a region, wherein the seismic survey data comprises body waves and surface waves, and the region comprises a plurality of locations, the method comprising:

receiving seismic survey data from at least one sensor;

characterizing spatial variability of a surface wave property for each location in the region, wherein the property is surface wave velocity or an attribute of velocity;

designing filtering criteria to separate at least a portion of the surface waves from the body waves in the seismic survey data using the characterization; and

applying the criteria to the seismic data to remove at least a portion of the surface waves from the seismic survey data.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the designing does not use interpolation to form a surface wave property for locations in the region.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the property is velocity dispersion of the surface waves.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein characterizing comprises:

estimating a local group velocity of the surface waves using cross-correlation.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein characterizing comprises:

converting the seismic survey data into complex analytic signals;

estimating a local group velocity of the surface waves by cross-correlation of the analytic signals; and

averaging the local group velocity estimates.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

organizing the seismic survey data into gathers of traces;

wherein the gather is at least one of a common-shot type shot, a common-receiver type shot, and a super-shot type shot.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

using the seismic survey data having the portion of surface waves removed to determine whether there is an underground deposit of hydrocarbons in the region.

9. The method of claim 3, further comprising:

determining whether the region can be subdivided into a plurality of sub-regions based on the characterization, wherein the spatial variability is relatively constant within each sub-region;

if the determining is affirmative, estimating at least one local dispersion curve for each sub-region, and using that estimate for each location in the sub-region;

if the determining is negative, forming at least one dispersion curve for each location in the region;

using the dispersion curves from one of the estimating and the forming, extrapolating the dispersion curves over a frequency band; and

using the extrapolated dispersion curves to design the filtering criteria.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the characterizing comprises forming a surface-wave group velocity map of the region;

and the forming at least one dispersion curve comprises;

autocorrelating the group velocity map to determine correlation lengths of the surface waves;

determining a size of a window;

moving the window about the map;

estimating a local dispersion curve of the surface wave in each window; and

averaging repeating local dispersion curves at each location.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein determining a size of a window comprises:

using the correlation lengths as the size of the window.

12. The method of claim 10, wherein moving the window about the map comprises:

moving the window about the map wherein each window overlaps with a previous window.

13. The method of claim 9, wherein characterizing comprises:

converting the seismic survey data into complex analytic signals;

estimating a local group velocity of the surface waves by cross-correlation of the analytic signals; and

averaging the local group velocity estimates.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein the seismic survey data comprises a plurality of traces from a plurality of receivers of a shot source, and wherein characterizing further comprises:

sorting the data by source receiver offset.

15. The method of claim 13, wherein the seismic survey data comprises a plurality of traces from a plurality of receivers of a shot source, and wherein estimating comprises:

selecting the seismic survey data from two receivers for cross-correlation, wherein the two receivers have substantially the same azimuth to the source.

16. The method of claim 13, further comprising:

prior to the averaging, ignoring a noisy local group velocity.

17. The method of claim 9, wherein the cross-correlations are N×

1 type.

18. The method of claim 13, wherein the characterizing forms at least one surface-wave group velocity map of the region that depicts subregions of relatively constant group velocities.

19. The method of claim 9, further comprising:

organizing the seismic survey data into gathers of traces;

wherein the gather is at least one of a common-shot type, a common-receiver type, and a super-shot type.

20. The method of claim 9, further comprising:

using the seismic survey data having the portion of the surface wave removed to determine whether there is an underground deposit of hydrocarbon in the region.

26. The method of claim 9, wherein all determinings are negative, and wherein the seismic survey involved a source and at least one receiver, and further comprising:

integrating the extrapolated dispersion curves along a path from the source to a corresponding receiver, and forming a filter using the path-integration curves.

4. (canceled)

21. A method of processing seismic data from a region, wherein the seismic data comprises a plurality of traces from a plurality of receivers of a shot source, and the region comprises a plurality of locations, the method comprising:

converting the traces into complex analytic signals;

characterizing a spatial variability of velocities of surface waves for each location in the region by cross-correlating the analytic signals of neighboring traces; and

averaging the local group velocity estimates to determine the spatial variability of the surface waves.

22. The method of claim 21, wherein characterizing comprises:

determining an offset difference for the neighboring traces; and

dividing the offset difference by a time of a cross-correlation peak.

23. The method of claim 21, wherein the spatial variability is used to mitigate the surface waves in the seismic data.

24. The method of claim 21, where the spatial variability is used for analysis of at least one of shear wave statics, vegetation types, soil characteristics, moisture content, and seismic source and receiver coupling.

25. The method of claim 21, wherein the spatial variability is expressed as a map, and the map is used for at least one of seismic survey design, environmental characterization, processing of seismic data to mitigate effects of overburden by static corrections or seismic imaging, compressional-to-shear (P-S) wave imaging and registration, and determination of and processing for azimuthal anisotropy of shear-wave velocities.