REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT METHOD FOR PURCHASING A PLURALITY OF DISTRESSED PROPERTIES FROM A SINGLE INSTITUTION AT FORMULA-DERIVED PRICES

• US 20100293114A1
• Filed: 05/15/2009
• Published: 11/18/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 05/15/2009
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Mohammed Salahuddin Khan, Syed Jafer Hasnain
• Original Assignee: Mohammed Salahuddin Khan, Syed Jafer Hasnain
• Inventors: Khan, Mohammed Salahuddin, Hasnain, Syed Jafer
• Application Number:
  US12/466,921
• Publication Number:
  US 20100293114A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/500
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/06 Asset management; Financial planning or analysis
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 99/00 Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass

Abstract

A real estate investing method is disclosed in which aggregated investment capital is used to purchase a plurality of properties from a single lending institution at short-sale prices calculated using a pre-negotiated formula. The lending institution agrees to identify and qualify properties, and accept the short-sale prices, in return for selling a plurality of distressed properties under a single agreement. Owners avoid foreclosure and consequent damage to their credit. Investors aren'"'"'t burdened by property selection and/or maintenance. In preferred embodiments, owner-occupied homes are purchased, leased back to their occupants, and eventually resold to the occupants if their finances recover. Repurchase credit incentives can be offered to occupants, providing limited participation in property appreciation and motivating occupants to maintain the properties and strive to repurchase them. During leases, landlord services are provided under contract by local service providers and/or regional warranty providers. A central support group can provide centralized tenant support.

Claims

1. A method for investing in distressed real estate properties, the method comprising:

aggregating monetary investments from a plurality of investors so as to accumulate investment capital;

negotiating an agreement with a lending institution to purchase a plurality of distressed real estate properties at purchase prices to be calculated using a pricing formula specified in the agreement,

the agreement requiring the lending institution to identify a plurality of qualifying distressed properties by applying property qualifying criteria specified in the agreement to properties that are currently financed by the lending institution, and

the agreement requiring the lending institution to release all claims pertaining to each qualifying distressed property that is purchased under the agreement, in return for receipt by the lending institution of a specified portion of the purchase price;

using the investment capital, purchasing at least some of the qualifying distressed properties at the calculated purchase prices;

re-selling each of the plurality of purchased properties so as to produce proceeds; and

distributing at least some of the proceeds among the plurality of investors.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the agreement includes an offer to purchase all candidate properties identified by the lending institution, until a specified maximum aggregated purchase price is reached.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the pricing formula used to calculate the purchase price “

P”

for a distressed property having an appraised value “

A” and

a financing “

mortgage”

balance “

M”

can be expressed as;

P=MF×

Min(J×

A,K×

M);

where MF is a “

market factor”

that depends on real estate factors applicable to a region in which the property is located;

“

Min”

indicates that MF is multiplied times the smaller of J times A and K times M;

J is a number between zero and one, inclusive;

K is a number between zero and one, inclusive; and

K is less than J if M is greater than A.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein J is 0.7 and K is 0.65.

5. The method of claim 3, wherein the real estate factors upon which MF depends include a density of foreclosures DF and a rental cap rate CR,

the density of foreclosures DF being expressible as a ratio of all properties that are located within a specified region to all properties that are in foreclosure in the specified region;

and

the rental cap rate CR being expressible as a ratio of average annual gross rental income to average property value for all rental properties in the specified region.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the real estate factors upon which MF depends further include at least one of:

a population density “

DP”

that indicates an average density of residents in the specified region, DP being expressible as residents-per-unit area;

an average household size “

H”

that indicates an average number of residents residing in each household in the specified region, H being expressible as a number of residents;

a number of foreclosures per unit area “

FD”

that indicates a number of properties in foreclosure per unit area within the specified region, FD being calculated according to the formula FD=DP/(H×

DF); and

an average separation of foreclosures “

SF”

that is calculated according to the formula SF=0.5/(SQRT(FD)), where “

SQRT(FD)”

is the square root of FD.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the market factor can be calculated according to the formula MF=(0.9+CR)×

(1-0.09 exp(−

2.2×

SF)), where exp is the exponential function.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the property qualifying criteria applied to properties by the lending institution include at least one of:

a negative equity requirement that an estimated value of the property be below its financing balance; and

an unencumberment requirement that there be no tax liens and no contractor liens applicable to the owner-occupied property.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the estimated value of the owner-occupied property is determined by multiplying:

a published value-per-square-foot parameter associated with a region in which the property is located; and

a total square-footage of the property.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the agreement further requires that the lending institution offer to any holder of a secondary lien on a qualifying distressed property a financial inducement, in return for the secondary lien holder withholding any objections it may have to a suspension of foreclosure of the qualifying distressed property.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the financial inducement is the lesser of a specified dollar amount and a specified percentage of an outstanding balance of the secondary lien owed to the holder of the secondary lien.

12. The method of claim 1, further comprising leasing at least some of the plurality of purchased properties to tenants before selling the properties, and providing landlord services to the tenants during the leasing, including maintenance, repairs, and collection of lease payments.

13. The method of claim 12, further comprising distributing to the investors at least a portion of lease payments received from tenants occupying the purchased properties.

14. The method of claim 12, wherein at least some of the landlord services are subcontracted to at least one of local service providers and regional warranty providers.

15. The method of claim 12, wherein at least some of the landlord services are coordinated by a central landlord services group.

16. The method of claim 12, further comprising creating a central support group that can provide support services to the tenants.

17. A method for investing in distressed single-family properties, the method comprising:

aggregating monetary investments from a plurality of investors so as to accumulate investment capital;

negotiating an agreement with a lending institution to purchase a plurality of distressed single-family properties at purchase prices to be calculated using a pricing formula specified in the agreement,

the agreement requiring the lending institution to identify a plurality of qualifying single-family properties by applying property qualifying criteria specified in the agreement to single-family properties that are financed by the lending institution and currently occupied by owner-occupants, and

the agreement requiring the lending institution to release all claims pertaining to each qualifying property that is purchased under the agreement, in return for receipt by the lending institution of a specified portion of the purchase price;

for each qualifying property, applying occupant qualifying criteria to the owner-occupant, so as to determine if the owner-occupant is a qualified occupant who is financially qualified to be a tenant of the property;

using the investment capital, purchasing at the calculated purchase prices at least some of the plurality of qualifying distressed properties that are occupied by qualified occupants;

leasing each purchased property to its qualified occupant;

re-selling each of the plurality of purchased properties so as to produce proceeds, each purchased property being re-sold, if possible, to its qualified occupant; and

distributing at least some of the proceeds among the plurality of investors.

18. The method of claim 17, wherein the occupant qualifying criteria applied to each owner-occupant include at least one of:

a non-delinquency requirement that there have been no over-60-days finance payment delinquencies during two years prior to a most recent finance rate adjustment;

a non-delinquency requirement that there have not been more than two over-30-days finance payment delinquencies during two years prior to a most recent finance rate adjustment;

if the owner-occupant is employed by an employer, an employment verification requirement verifying the employment and gross income of the owner-occupant;

if the owner-occupant is self-employed, a three year balance sheet requirement verifying the ability of the owner-occupant to produce a sustained income;

a job security requirement verifying that an acceptable degree of job security applies to at least one of an occupation and an industry of employment of the owner-occupant;

a job security requirement verifying that an acceptable published job security score applies to at least one of an occupation and an industry of employment of the owner-occupant;

a requirement that applicable lease payments for the property will not exceed a specified percentage of the owner-occupant'"'"'s gross income;

a requirement that a total of applicable lease payments and other recurring payment commitments of the owner-occupant will not exceed a specified percentage of the owner-occupant'"'"'s gross income;

a requirement that there are no unsatisfied court judgments applicable to the owner-occupant;

a requirement that there are no pending civil or criminal court proceedings applicable to the owner-occupant; and

a requirement that there have been no prior un-discharged bankruptcies applicable to the owner-occupant during seven years prior to a proposed date of purchase.

19. The method of claim 17, wherein the occupant qualifying criteria applied to each owner-occupant include a requirement that applicable lease payments for the property will not exceed 25% of the owner-occupant'"'"'s gross income.

20. The method of claim 17, wherein the occupant qualifying criteria applied to each owner-occupant include a requirement that a total of applicable lease payments and other recurring payment commitments of the owner-occupant will not exceed 34% of the owner-occupant'"'"'s gross income.

21. The method of claim 17, wherein re-selling the plurality of purchased properties includes, for each purchased property, before accepting an offer from a third party to purchase the property, providing an opportunity to the qualified occupant to match the offer and thereby purchase the property.

22. The method of claim 17, wherein re-selling the plurality of purchased properties includes, for each purchased property, not reselling the purchased property for a specified period of time to any buyer other than the qualified occupant.

23. The method of claim 22, wherein the specified period of time is at least five years.

24. The method of claim 17, wherein re-selling the plurality of purchased properties includes offering to re-sell each purchased property to its qualified occupant at a resale price that is not higher than an appraised price, the appraised price being determined by at least one independent appraiser.

25. The method of claim 24, wherein the resale price is calculated by applying a repurchase discount percentage reduction to the appraised price, the repurchase discount percentage reduction being calculated on a basis which causes it to increase with time subject to sustained desirable behavior by the qualified occupant.