Apparatuses, Methods and Systems For An Information Comparator Comparison Engine

• US 20100293490A1
• Filed: 09/26/2007
• Published: 11/18/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 09/26/2006
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Armand Rousso, Steven Schwartz
• Original Assignee: Armand Rousso, Steven Schwartz
• Inventors: Schwartz, Steven, Rousso, Armand
• Application Number:
  US12/443,027
• Publication Number:
  US 20100293490A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 715/771
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/02 Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising

Abstract

The disclosure details the implementation of an apparatuses, methods, and systems for an information comparator comparison engine. The disclosure teaches an information comparator comparison engine for the determination, generation and presentation of comparison information that is user-friendly, attractive and straightforward. In one embodiment, the information comparator comparison engine provides facilities for the determination, generation and/or presentation of ads and/or other information items in the context of a comparison. The information comparator comparison engine allows for the presentation of multiple comparative information items in numerous contexts and situations. In one embodiment, the information comparator comparison engine may group, tag and/or categorize information items to identify comparable information items. The information comparator comparison engine enhances search mechanisms, research and comparisons regarding information, news, advertising, and/or the like. Further, the information comparator comparison engine may provide a mechanism for analytics that assists in making information searches more efficient and meaningful.

Claims

1. A processor-implemented method for providing comparison presentations, comprising:

collecting a plurality of information items;

determining comparison relationship metrics for each of the collected information terns;

associating determined comparison relationship metrics with corresponding information items;

generating a comparison presentation template, wherein the comparison presentation template comprises at least two information panes for displaying collected information items;

populating each of the at least two information panes of the comparison presentation with an information item,

wherein information items are selected according to associated comparison relationship metrics; and

providing the populated comparison presentation for display to a user.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

monitoring user behavior in response to a displayed comparison presentation; and

determining and storing user interaction metrics for the displayed comparison presentation based on monitored user behavior.

3. The method of claim 2, further comprising adjusting comparison relationship metrics based on stored user interaction metrics.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the determined comparison relationship metrics include similarity tags, where information items with an at least one similar characteristic each have an at least one similarity tag indicating said similar characteristic.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein information items are selected to populate the at least two information panes based on the at least one similarity tags of the information items.

6. A method for providing comparison information, comprising:

accumulating a plurality of information items;

storing the accumulated information items in an information item database;

assigning each information item to an at least one comparison category,

wherein information items assigned to the same comparison category are comparable information items;

generating a comparison presentation template;

associating a comparison category with the comparison presentation template;

storing the comparison presentation template in a comparison presentation database;

populating the comparison presentation template with at least two information items; and

providing the populated comparison presentation template for viewing.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein the at least two information items populated in the comparison presentation template are information items assigned the comparison category associated with the comparison presentation template.

8. The method of claim 6 wherein populating the comparison presentation template is in response to receiving a comparison query.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein selection of information items populated to the comparison presentation template is based on the received comparison query.

10. The method of claim 9 wherein the received comparison query includes information browsing application data.

11. The method of claim 9 wherein the received comparison query includes user-specific data.

12. The method of claim 9 wherein the received comparison query includes site context data.

13. The method of claim 9 wherein the received comparison query includes location context data.

14. The method of claim 9 wherein the received comparison query includes user history data.

15. The method of claim 9 wherein the received comparison query includes demographic data.

16. The method of claim 9 wherein the received comparison query includes user system data.

17. The method of claim 9 wherein the received comparison query includes stored user interaction data.

18. The method of claim 9 wherein the received comparison query includes stored advertiser-specified data.

19. The method of claim 6 wherein the least two comparative information items populated to comparison presentation template include an at least one information item selected according to a rule set.

20. The method of claim 19 wherein the rule set includes an at least one rule based on input from an advertiser.

21-38. -38. (canceled)