Architectural Data Metrics Overlay

• US 20100293519A1
• Filed: 05/12/2009
• Published: 11/18/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 05/12/2009
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC (Microsoft Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Microsoft Corporation
• Inventors: Sauntry, David, Massey, Daniel, Groves, Mark, Bavey, Ian
• Granted Patent: US 8,413,108 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 717/101
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3616 using software metrics

Abstract

A system and method for facilitating analysis of a software project. Intrinsic measures, activity-based measures, or dynamic measures associated with the project are received, including measures associated with physical program units and logical program units of the project. Mappings between physical program units and logical program units are generated. An architectural diagram including logical program units is received, and may include additional mappings of the logical program units. The mappings are used to roll up measures from physical project units to logical project units, and from logical project units to other logical project units. An overlay diagram is generated, including the rolled up measures. The overlay diagram includes the architectural diagram and a representation of rolled up measures associated with each logical project unit on the diagram. The representations employ a graphic format that facilitates a user determining risk areas of the software project. A user may view effects of project changes prior to checking them into source control.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method for analyzing metrics related to a project having a plurality of logical project units and a plurality of physical project units, comprising:

a) receiving intrinsic measures indicative of a static structure of one or more portions of the project;

b) receiving activity-based measures indicative of user activity related to the project;

c) receiving an architectural diagram representing at least a first portion of the plurality of logical project units;

d) receiving mapping data that maps at least a second portion of the plurality of logical project units to one or more of the plurality of physical project units;

e) generating, for each of the first portion of the plurality of logical project units, a corresponding set of rollup measure data by determining one or more of the intrinsic measures and one or more of the activity-based measures associated with the logical project unit, based on the mapping data; and

f) combining the architectural diagram with the set of rollup measure data corresponding to each of the first portion of the plurality of logical project units to generate an overlay diagram, the overlay diagram including, for each of the second plurality of logical project units, a corresponding visual representation of the corresponding set of rollup measure data.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, each visual representation indicative of one or more trends of one or more of the intrinsic measures or one or more of the activity-based measures.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, further comprising receiving dynamic measures indicative of results from execution of the project;

and generating the set of rollup measure data further comprises determining one or more of the dynamic measures associated with the logical project unit, based on the mapping data.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, further comprising generating each visual representation of the corresponding rollup measure data to include at least one of a Sparkline, a bar chart, or a ratings graphic format, the format of each visual representation in common with each other visual representation.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, generating the overlay diagram further comprising selectively shading each of the representations of the second portion of the plurality of logical project units based on the set of rollup measure data.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the one or more intrinsic measures is derived from source code of the project stored in a project repository, further comprising:

a) receiving one or more auxiliary intrinsic measures indicative of a static structure of one or more auxiliary portions of the project;

b) generating auxiliary rollup measure data from the one or more auxiliary intrinsic measures, based on the mapping data;

c) combining the auxiliary rollup measure data with the rollup measure data into a composite rollup measure data; and

d) combining the architectural diagram with the composite rollup measure data to generate an overlay diagram that displays the rollup measure data distinct from the composite rollup measure data.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 5, further comprising:

receiving one or more auxiliary dynamic measures indicative of one or more executions of the one or more auxiliary portions of the project; and

generating the auxiliary rollup measure data from the one or more auxiliary dynamic measures.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, further comprising:

a) extracting diagram mapping data from the architectural diagram, the diagram mapping data associating the first portion of the plurality of logical project units with corresponding source code logical project units;

b) extracting the source code logical project units from source code of the project;

c) generating physical-to-logical mapping data that associates binary files of the project to the corresponding source code logical project units and the first portion of the plurality of logical project units, based on the diagram mapping data and the source code logical software units.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, each of the intrinsic measures associating a corresponding measure with a corresponding physical project unit of the physical project units, the overlay diagram based on an association between each of the first portion of the plurality of logical project units and a corresponding physical project unit.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein at least one of the one or more physical project units has a pure many-to-many relationship with at least one of the first portion of the plurality of logical project units.

11. A computer-readable storage medium comprising computer program instructions for analyzing a project, the program instructions executable by a processor to perform actions including:

a) receiving one or more intrinsic measures indicative of a static structure of one or more portions of the project;

b) receiving one or more activity-based measures indicative of user activity related to the project;

c) receiving mapping data that maps each of a plurality of logical project units to one or more physical project units;

d) receiving an architectural diagram including a representation of each of the plurality of logical project units;

e) associating each of the plurality of logical project units with a corresponding set of the received activity-based measures and a corresponding set of the received intrinsic measures;

f) combining the architectural diagram with the received activity-based measures and the received intrinsic measures to generate an overlay diagram, the overlay diagram comprising the architectural diagram and, for each of the plurality of logical project units, the corresponding set of the received activity-based measures and the corresponding set of the received intrinsic measures displayed in a graph proximate to the logical project unit representation.

12. The computer-implemented method of claim 11, further comprising receiving dynamic measures indicative of results from execution of the project;

and associating each of the plurality of logical project units with a corresponding set of the received dynamic measures.

13. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 11, the actions further including:

storing the one or more intrinsic measures and the one or more activity-based measures in one or more denormalized databases;

extracting and translating the one or more intrinsic measures and the one or more activity-based measures into translated data; and

storing the translated data in a normalized database.

14. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 11, the actions further including:

a) receiving one or more binary files generated from source code of the project;

b) generating at least a portion of the mapping data by associating each of the plurality of logical project units to a corresponding received binary file.

15. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 11, wherein the architectural diagram is a UML diagram created by a user.

16. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 11, the actions further including:

a) extracting one or more auxiliary intrinsic measures from an auxiliary source code file;

b) combining the one or more auxiliary intrinsic measures with at least one set of the received intrinsic measures to generate one or more composite measures; and

c) displaying each of the one or more composite measures in a corresponding graph to distinguish the composite measures from the received intrinsic measures.

17. A computer-based system for analyzing a project having physical project units and logical project units, comprising:

a) means for mapping the physical project units to the logical project units;

b) means for receiving intrinsic measures and activity-based measures associated with the physical project units;

c) means for receiving an architectural diagram including a set of logical program units;

c) means for associating the intrinsic measures and the activity-based measures with the set of logical program units; and

d) means for generating an overlay diagram that includes a visual representation of the intrinsic measures corresponding to each of the set of logical program units.

18. The system of claim 17, further comprising means for generating the architectural diagram from source code of the project.

19. The system of claim 17, further comprising a normalized database configured for data retrieval on each of a plurality of dimensions, including dimensions of source file, object-oriented project unit, date, and logical subsystem.

20. The computer-based system of claim 17, the means for mapping comprising a mechanism that maintains vectors of logical project units and combines the vectors to associate physical project units with each of the logical project units.