METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MODIFYING PULSE SEQUENCES

• US 20100308829A1
• Filed: 06/03/2009
• Published: 12/09/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 06/03/2009
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: General Electric Company
• Original Assignee: General Electric Company
• Inventors: Sun, Wei, Vu, Anthony Tienhuan, Bayram, Ersin
• Granted Patent: US 8,030,920 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 324/314
• CPC Class Codes: G01R 33/288 Provisions within MR facilities for enhancing safety during MR, e.g. reduction of the specific absorption rate [SAR], detection of ferromagnetic objects in the scanner room
• CPC Class Codes: G01R 33/385 using gradient magnetic field coils
• CPC Class Codes: G01R 33/543 Control of the operation of the MR system, e.g. setting of acquisition parameters prior to or during MR data acquisition, dynamic shimming, use of one or more scout images for scan plane prescription G01R33/546 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: H03K 6/04 Modifying slopes of pulses, e.g. S-correction S-correction in television H04N3/23

Abstract

Methods and systems are provided for modifying a pulse sequence. In one embodiment, a determination is made whether an estimated peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) associated with a pulse sequence exceeds a PNS limit. If the estimated PNS exceeds the PNS limit, a slew rate associated with one or more axes of the pulse sequence may be reduced and the maximum gradient amplitudes for each axis of the pulse sequence may be adjusted. In one embodiment, adjustment of the maximum gradient amplitudes or local slew rate may be based upon a cost analysis performed on the pulse sequence.

Claims

1. A method for modifying a pulse sequence, the method comprising the steps of:

calculating timing and amplitudes of a pulse sequence;

performing a cost function analysis on desired gradient overlap regions of the pulse sequence;

determining the available encoding time based on the costliest axis per overlap region;

resetting a maximum gradient amplitude for one or more gradient axes based on the cost function analysis and/or resetting local slew rate, up to global slew rate, for one or more gradient axes based on the cost function analysis to utilize some or all of the available encoding time per overlap region;

applying a peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) model based at least in part on the pulse sequence;

comparing an output of the PNS model to a PNS limit;

adjusting a global slew rate used to calculate the timing of the pulse sequence if the output of the PNS model exceeds the PNS limit;

recalculating timing and amplitudes of the pulse sequence based on the adjusted global slew rate and the reset maximum gradient amplitudes and/or the local slew rate; and

repeating the steps of applying, comparing, adjusting, performing, resetting, and recalculating until the output of the PNS model is within the PNS limit.

2. The method of claim 1, comprising setting an initial slew rate to a desired limit up to the maximum value allowed for an MRI system of interest.

3. The method of claim 1, comprising setting the initial maximum gradient amplitude for the one or more gradient axes.

4. The method of claim 1, comprising initially setting the maximum gradient amplitude for the one or more gradient axis to desired limit up to the maximum value allowed for an MRI system of interest.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein adjusting the global slew rate comprises reducing between about 1% to about 25% across some or all of the axes.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the global slew rate is adjusted based on a ramp scale factor.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the cost function analysis per overlap region comprises one or more of a total gradient area or a peak gradient amplitude in the particular overlap region.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the cost function analysis may be performed for each gradient segment in an overlap region for each axis.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the cost function analysis for pre-signal acquisition overlap region is based on the weighted (phase) encoding (y,z) area, dephaser (x) area, and rephaser (z) area.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the cost function analysis for post-signal acquisition overlap region is based on the weighted (rewinder) encoding (y,z) area, killer/crusher (x) area, and killer/crusher (z) area.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein resetting the maximum gradient amplitude for one or more gradient axes comprises increasing the gradient amplitude on the axis determined to be costliest by the cost function analysis.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein resetting the maximum gradient amplitude for one or more gradient axes comprises reducing the gradient amplitude and extending the gradient duration to use some or all the available encoding time on one or more axes determined not to be the costliest by the cost function analysis.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein resetting local slew rate for one or more gradient axes comprises using the available global slew rate on the axis determined to be costliest by the cost function analysis.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein resetting local slew rate for one or more gradient axes comprises reducing slew rate and extending the gradient duration to use some or all of the available encoding time on one or more axes determined not to be the costliest by the cost function analysis.

15. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system, comprising:

an MRI scanner;

scanner control circuitry capable of controlling operation of the scanner, the scanner control circuitry comprising;

a memory capable of storing one or more routines for adjusting a pulse sequence;

control circuitry capable of implementing the one or more routines, wherein the one or more routines, when executed, calculate timing and amplitudes for a pulse sequence, compare an estimate of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) associated with the pulse sequence against a PNS limit, adjust one or more of the slew rate and the maximum gradient amplitude for each axis if the estimate of PNS exceeds the PNS limit, and recalculate the timing and amplitudes for the pulse sequence until the estimate of PNS does not exceed the PNS limit; and

system control circuitry capable of controlling operation of the scanner control circuitry.

16. The magnetic resonance imaging system of claim 15, wherein the one or more routines perform a cost function analysis for each gradient segment in an overlap region for each axis of the pulse sequence, and wherein the one or more routines adjust the maximum gradient amplitude and/or the slew rate for each axis based upon the cost function analysis.

17. The magnetic resonance imaging system of claim 16, wherein the cost function analysis comprises one or more of a total gradient area or a peak gradient amplitude.

18. A computer-readable medium physically encoding one or more routines comprising:

a routine capable of calculating timing and amplitudes of a pulse sequence;

a routine capable of comparing an estimate of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) associated with the pulse sequence against a PNS limit;

a routine capable of adjusting one or more of a slew rate and a maximum gradient amplitude for each axis of the pulse sequence if the estimate of PNS exceeds the PNS limit; and

a routine capable of recalculating the timing and amplitudes for the pulse sequence until the estimate of PNS does not exceed the PNS limit.

19. The computer-readable medium of claim 18, comprising:

a routine capable of calculating a cost for each gradient segment in an overlap region for each axis of the pulse sequence;

wherein the routine capable of adjusting the maximum gradient amplitude and/or the local slew rate for each axis of the pulse sequence accepts the calculated costs as an input.

20. The computer-readable medium of claim 18, wherein the routine capable of adjusting the slew rate reduces the slew rate if the estimate of PNS exceeds the PNS limit.