METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR EVENT PRIORITIZATION AND ARBITRATION IN A MULTI-RADIO DEVICE

• US 20110007688A1
• Filed: 11/16/2009
• Published: 01/13/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 07/09/2009
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Qualcomm, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Qualcomm, Inc.
• Inventors: Kadous, Tamer A., Linsky, Joel B., Mantravadi, Ashok, Veeravalli, Venugopal V.
• Application Number:
  US12/619,557
• Publication Number:
  US 20110007688A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 370/328
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 16/14 Spectrum sharing arrangements between different networks
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 72/20 Control channels or signalling for resource management
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 88/06 adapted for operation in multiple networks or having at least two operational modes, e.g. multi-mode terminals

Abstract

Systems and methodologies are described herein that facilitate prioritization and arbitration of radio events associated with a set of potentially conflicting radios supported by a wireless device. As described herein, bin-based priority can be implemented for respective radio events such that events are assigned to bins of varying priority levels based on factors such as functional correlations of respective events to data loss, event deadlines, or relative radio priorities. Subsequently, selection of an event combination can be performed based on bins to which respective events are assigned. Techniques are additionally described herein for arbitrating among conflicting radio events assigned to the same bin using random selection, history-based arbitration, or the like. As further described herein, arbitration can be adjusted to favor selection of new, ongoing, or previously events. Further, arbitration as described herein can be adjusted to accommodate events that execute in a plurality of decision units in time.

Claims

1. A method, comprising:

identifying a plurality of radio events associated with a corresponding set of radios for which notifications are provided; and

selecting a radio event combination from the plurality of radio events based on at least one of bins to which respective radio events are assigned, respective scale factors associated with the respective radio events, or respective history variables associated with the respective radio events.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising assigning respective radio events to corresponding bins based at least in part on functional correlations of the respective radio events to data loss, deadlines associated with the respective radio events, or relative priorities of radios associated with the respective radio events.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the assigning comprises:

identifying respective sub-events associated with a given radio event; and

assigning the given radio event to a bin corresponding to a highest priority sub-event of the given radio event.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising associating scale factors with respective radio events based at least in part on functional correlations of the respective radio events to data loss, deadlines associated with the respective radio events, or relative priorities of radios associated with the respective radio events.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising moving a radio event from an associated bin to a disparate, higher priority bin as a function of previous denials of the radio event or a deadline associated with the radio event.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the moving is performed by a coexistence manager for the radio event.

7. The method of claim 5, wherein the moving is performed by a radio associated with the radio event.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the selecting comprises arbitrating between respective conflicting radio event combinations based at least in part on scale factors associated with radio events in the respective radio event combinations.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the arbitrating comprises:

identifying a first radio event combination and a second radio event combination that conflicts with the first radio event combination;

identifying a first set of bin indices with which respective radio events in the first radio event combination are associated and a second set of bin indices with which respective radio events in the second radio event combination are associated; and

arbitrating between the first radio event combination and the second radio event combination upon determining that substantially all bin indices in the first set of bin indices or a predefined number of highest priority bin indices in the first set of bin indices match respective bin indices in the second set of bin indices.

10. The method of claim 8, wherein the arbitrating comprises:

identifying a first radio event combination and a second radio event combination that conflicts with the first radio event combination;

removing respective radio events from the first radio event combination and the second radio event combination that are common to the first radio event combination and the second radio event combination; and

arbitrating between the first radio event combination and the second radio event combination based at least in part on maximum bin indices associated with respective radio events in the first radio event combination and the second radio event combination that remain after the removing.

11. The method of claim 8, wherein the arbitrating comprises arbitrating between respective radio event combinations by performing random selection based at least in part on sums of scale factors associated with the respective radio event combinations.

12. The method of claim 8, wherein the arbitrating comprises performing history-based arbitration between respective radio event combinations at least in part by obtaining ratios for respective radio event combinations, the ratios given in terms of a sum of scale factors associated with a radio event combination to a sum of history variables associated with the radio event combination, and selecting a radio event combination having a maximum ratio.

13. The method of claim 8, wherein the arbitrating comprises updating one or more history variables associated with a radio event combination upon selecting or denying the radio event combination as a function of respective scale factors associated with the radio event combination or respective scale factors associated with one or more radio event combinations with which the radio event combination was conflicting.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein the updating comprises altering one or more history variables associated with the radio event combination upon selection of the radio event combination such that the radio event combination is less likely to be selected in a subsequent arbitration.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the altering comprises:

performing a first multiplication of a history variable with 1 minus a history window value, the history window value being a real number value between 0 and 1;

performing a second multiplication of the history window value with a penalty parameter computed as a function of scale factors associated with the radio event combination or one or more radio event combinations with which the radio event combination was conflicting; and

updating the history variable to a result of the first multiplication plus a result of the second multiplication.

16. The method of claim 13, wherein the updating comprises altering one or more history variables associated with the radio event combination upon denial of the radio event combination such that the radio event combination is more likely to be selected in a subsequent arbitration.

17. The method of claim 16, wherein the altering comprises setting the history variable to a history window value multiplied by a penalty parameter computed as a function of scale factors associated with the radio event combination or one or more radio event combinations with which the radio event combination was conflicting, the history window value being a real number value between 0 and 1.

18. The method of claim 13, further comprising updating a scale factor for a delayable radio event combination as a function of time to a deadline of the delayable radio event combination.

19. The method of claim 13, wherein the updating comprises updating a history variable for a radio event that executes in a plurality of decision units (DUs) based on a total length of the radio event.

20. The method of claim 19, wherein the updating further comprises updating the history variable for the radio event based on respective radio events that are denied during execution of the radio event.

21. The method of claim 13, wherein the updating comprises updating a history variable for a radio event that executes in a plurality of DUs based on an average per-DU penalty computed for the plurality of DUs over which the radio event is executed.

22. The method of claim 13, wherein the updating comprises updating a history variable for a radio event that executes in a plurality of DUs based on respective DUs for which the radio event conflicts with at least one other radio event during a duration of the radio event.

23. The method of claim 8, further comprising increasing a scale factor associated with an ongoing radio event during execution of the ongoing radio event, thereby rendering the ongoing radio event less likely to be preempted by respective radio event combinations that do not include the ongoing event.

24. The method of claim 8, further comprising:

identifying a new radio event for which no history exists; and

initializing a history variable for the new radio event such that the history variable for the new radio event is decreased relative to corresponding history variables for respective existing radio events, thereby rendering the new radio event more likely to be selected in a subsequent arbitration.

25. A wireless communications apparatus, comprising:

a memory that stores data relating to respective radio events associated with a corresponding set of radios; and

a processor configured to select a radio event combination composed of the respective radio events based on at least one of bins to which the respective radio events are assigned, respective scale factors associated with the respective radio events, or respective history variables associated with the respective radio events.

26. The wireless communications apparatus of claim 25, wherein the processor is further configured to assign the respective radio events to corresponding bins based at least in part on functional correlations of the respective radio events to data loss, deadlines associated with the respective radio events, or relative priorities of radios associated with the respective radio events.

27. The wireless communications apparatus of claim 26, wherein the processor is further configured to assign a radio event to a bin at least in part by identifying respective sub-events associated with the radio event and assigning the radio event to a bin corresponding to a highest priority sub-event of the radio event.

28. The wireless communications apparatus of claim 25, wherein the processor is further configured to associate scale factors with the respective radio events based at least in part on functional correlations of the respective radio events to data loss, deadlines associated with the respective radio events, or relative priorities of radios associated with the respective radio events.

29. The wireless communications apparatus of claim 25, wherein the processor is further configured to facilitate jumping of a radio event from an associated bin to a new, higher priority bin as a function of previous denials of the radio event or a deadline associated with the radio event.

30. The wireless communications apparatus of claim 29, wherein the processor is further configured to facilitate jumping of the radio event via a coexistence manager for the radio event.

31. The wireless communications apparatus of claim 29, wherein the processor is further configured to facilitate jumping of the radio event via a radio associated with the radio event.

32. The wireless communications apparatus of claim 25, wherein the processor is further configured to arbitrate between respective conflicting radio event combinations based at least in part on scale factors associated with radio events in the respective radio event combinations.

33. The wireless communications apparatus of claim 32, wherein:

the memory further stores data relating to a first radio event combination and a second radio event combination that conflicts with the first radio event combination; and

the processor is further configured to obtain information relating to bin indices with which respective radio events in the first radio event combination are associated, to obtain information relating to bin indices with which respective radio events in the second radio event combination are associated, and to arbitrate between the first radio event combination and the second radio event combination upon determining that substantially all bin indices associated with the first radio event combination or a predefined number of highest priority bin indices associated with the first radio event combination substantially match respective bin indices associated with the second radio event combination.

34. The wireless communications apparatus of claim 32, wherein:

the memory further stores data relating to a first radio event combination and a second radio event combination that conflicts with the first radio event combination; and

the processor is further configured to removing respective radio events from the first radio event combination and the second radio event combination that are common between the first radio event combination and the second radio event combination and to arbitrate between the first radio event combination and the second radio event combination based at least in part on maximum bin indices associated with respective remaining radio events in the first radio event combination and the second radio event combination.

35. The wireless communications apparatus of claim 32, wherein the processor is further configured to arbitrate between respective radio event combinations by performing random selection based at least in part on sums of scale factors associated with the respective radio event combinations.

36. The wireless communications apparatus of claim 32, wherein the processor is further configured to perform history-based arbitration between respective radio event combinations at least in part by obtaining ratios for respective radio event combinations given in terms of a sum of scale factors associated with a radio event combination to a sum of history variables associated with the radio event combination and selecting a radio event combination having a maximum obtained ratio.

37. The wireless communications apparatus of claim 32, wherein the processor is further configured to update respective history variables associated with a radio event combination upon selecting or denying the radio event combination as a function of respective scale factors associated with the radio event combination or respective scale factors associated with one or more radio event combinations with which the radio event combination conflicts.

38. The wireless communications apparatus of claim 37, wherein the processor is further configured to alter respective history variables associated with the radio event combination upon selection of the radio event combination such that the radio event combination is less likely to be selected in a subsequent arbitration.

39. The wireless communications apparatus of claim 38, wherein the processor is further configured to alter a history variable associated with a radio event combination at least in part by performing a first multiplication of the history variable with 1 minus a history window value, the history window value being a real number value between 0 and 1;

performing a second multiplication of the history window value with a penalty parameter computed as a function of scale factors associated with the radio event combination or one or more radio event combinations with which the radio event combination conflicts; and

updating the history variable to a result of the first multiplication plus a result of the second multiplication.

40. The wireless communications apparatus of claim 37, wherein the processor is further configured to alter respective history variables associated with the radio event combination upon denial of the radio event combination such that the radio event combination is more likely to be selected in a subsequent arbitration.

41. The wireless communications apparatus of claim 38, wherein the processor is further configured to alter a history variable associated with a radio event combination at least in part by setting the history variable to a history window value multiplied by a penalty parameter computed as a function of scale factors associated with the radio event combination or one or more radio event combinations with which the radio event combination conflicts, the history window value being a real number value between 0 and 1.

42. The wireless communications apparatus of claim 37, wherein the processor is further configured to update a scale factor for a delayable radio event combination as a function of time to a deadline of the delayable radio event combination.

43. The wireless communications apparatus of claim 37, wherein the processor is further configured to update a history variable for a radio event that executes in a plurality of decision units (DUs) based on a total length of the radio event.

44. The wireless communications apparatus of claim 43, wherein the processor is further configured to update the history variable for the radio event based on respective radio events that are denied during execution of the radio event.

45. The wireless communications apparatus of claim 37, wherein the processor is further configured to update a history variable for a radio event that executes in a plurality of DUs based on an average per-DU penalty computed for the plurality of DUs over which the radio event is executed.

46. The wireless communications apparatus of claim 37, wherein the processor is further configured to update a history variable for a radio event that executes in a plurality of DUs based on respective DUs for which the radio event conflicts with at least one other radio event during a duration of the radio event.

47. The wireless communications apparatus of claim 32, wherein the processor is further configured to increase a scale factor associated with an ongoing radio event during execution of the ongoing radio event in order to render the ongoing radio event less likely to be preempted by respective radio event combinations that do not include the ongoing event.

48. The wireless communications apparatus of claim 32, wherein:

the memory further stores data relating to a new radio event for which no history exists; and

the processor is further configured to initialize a history variable for the new radio event by decreasing the history variable for the new radio event relative to corresponding history variables for respective existing radio events in order to render the new radio event more likely to be selected in a subsequent arbitration.

49. An apparatus, comprising:

means for obtaining information relating to respective radio events designated by respective corresponding radios; and

means for selecting a radio event combination from among the respective radio events based on at least one of bins, scale factors, or history variables associated with the respective radio events.

50. The apparatus of claim 49, further comprising means for assigning the respective radio events to corresponding bins based at least in part on functional correlations of the respective radio events to data loss, deadlines associated with the respective radio events, or relative priorities of radios associated with the respective radio events.

51. The apparatus of claim 50, wherein the means for assigning comprises:

means for identifying respective sub-events associated with a radio event; and

means for assigning the radio event to a bin corresponding to a highest priority sub-event of the radio event.

52. The apparatus of claim 49, further comprising means for assigning scale factors to respective radio events based at least in part on functional correlations of the respective radio events to data loss, deadlines associated with the respective radio events, or relative priorities of radios associated with the respective radio events.

53. The apparatus of claim 49, further comprising means for moving a radio event from an associated bin to a higher priority bin as a function of previous denials of the radio event or a deadline associated with the radio event.

54. The apparatus of claim 53, wherein the means for moving is implemented by a coexistence manager for the radio event.

55. The apparatus of claim 53, wherein the means for moving is implemented by a radio associated with the radio event.

56. The apparatus of claim 49, wherein the means for selecting comprises means for arbitrating between respective conflicting radio event combinations according to scale factors associated with radio events in the respective radio event combinations.

57. The apparatus of claim 56, wherein:

the means for obtaining information comprises means for identifying a first radio event combination and a second radio event combination that conflicts with the first radio event combination, means for identifying a first set of bin indices with which respective radio events in the first radio event combination are associated, and means for identifying a second set of bin indices with which respective radio events in the second radio event combination are associated; and

the means for arbitrating comprises means for arbitrating between the first radio event combination and the second radio event combination upon determining that substantially all bin indices in the first set of bin indices or a predefined number of highest priority bin indices in the first set of bin indices match respective corresponding bin indices in the second set of bin indices.

58. The apparatus of claim 56, wherein:

the means for obtaining information comprises means for identifying a first radio event combination and a second radio event combination that conflicts with the first radio event combination; and

the means for arbitrating comprises means for removing respective common radio events between the first radio event combination and the second radio event combination from the first radio event combination and the second radio event combination and means for arbitrating between the first radio event combination and the second radio event combination based at least in part on maximum bin indices associated with respective remaining radio events in the first radio event combination and the second radio event combination subsequent to removal of common radio events.

59. The apparatus of claim 56, wherein the means for arbitrating comprises means for randomly selecting a radio event combination from among respective conflicting radio event combinations based at least in part on sums of scale factors associated with the respective conflicting radio event combinations.

60. The apparatus of claim 56, wherein the means for arbitrating comprises:

means for obtaining ratios for respective radio event combinations defined in terms of a sum of scale factors associated with a given radio event combination to a sum of history variables associated with the given radio event combination; and

means for selecting a radio event combination having a maximum obtained ratio.

61. The apparatus of claim 56, wherein the means for arbitrating comprises means for updating one or more history variables associated with a radio event combination upon selecting or denying the radio event combination as a function of respective scale factors associated with the radio event combination or respective scale factors associated with one or more radio event combinations with which the radio event combination conflicts.

62. The apparatus of claim 61, wherein the means for updating comprises means for altering one or more history variables associated with the radio event combination upon selection of the radio event combination such that the radio event combination is less likely to be selected in a subsequent arbitration.

63. The apparatus of claim 62, wherein the means for altering comprises:

means for conducting a first multiplication of a given history variable with 1 minus a history window value, the history window value being a real number value between 0 and 1;

means for conducting a second multiplication of the history window value with a penalty parameter computed as a function of scale factors associated with the radio event combination or one or more radio event combinations with which the radio event combination conflicts; and

means for updating the given history variable to a result of the first multiplication plus a result of the second multiplication.

64. The apparatus of claim 61, wherein the means for updating comprises means for altering one or more history variables associated with the radio event combination upon denial of the radio event combination such that the radio event combination is more likely to be selected in a subsequent arbitration.

65. The apparatus of claim 64, wherein the means for altering comprises means for setting a given history variable to a history window value multiplied by a penalty parameter computed as a function of scale factors associated with the radio event combination or one or more radio event combinations with which the radio event combination conflicts, the history window value being a real number value between 0 and 1.

66. The apparatus of claim 61, further comprising means for updating a scale factor for a delayable radio event combination as a function of time to a deadline of the delayable radio event combination.

67. The apparatus of claim 61, wherein the means for updating comprises means for updating a history variable for a radio event that executes in a plurality of decision units (DUs) based on a total length of the radio event.

68. The apparatus of claim 67, wherein the means for updating further comprises means for updating the history variable for the radio event based on respective radio events that are denied during execution of the radio event.

69. The apparatus of claim 61, wherein the means for updating comprises means for updating a history variable for a radio event that executes in a plurality of DUs based on an average per-DU penalty computed for the plurality of DUs over which the radio event is executed.

70. The apparatus of claim 61, wherein the means for updating comprises means for updating a history variable for a radio event that executes in a plurality of DUs based on respective DUs for which the radio event conflicts with at least one other radio event over a duration of the radio event.

71. The apparatus of claim 56, further comprising means for increasing a scale factor associated with an ongoing radio event during execution of the ongoing radio event in order to render the ongoing radio event less likely to be preempted by respective radio event combinations that do not include the ongoing event.

72. The apparatus of claim 56, further comprising:

means for identifying a new radio event for which no history exists; and

means for decreasing a history variable for the new radio event relative to corresponding history variables for respective existing radio events in order to render the new radio event more likely to be selected in a subsequent arbitration.

73. A computer program product, comprising:

a computer-readable medium, comprising;

code for causing a computer to identify data relating to respective radio events associated with a corresponding set of radios; and

code for causing a computer to select a radio event combination composed of the respective radio events based on at least one of bins to which the respective radio events are assigned, respective scale factors associated with the respective radio events, or respective history variables associated with the respective radio events.

74. An integrated circuit that executes a set of machine-executable instructions, the set of machine-executable instructions comprising:

obtaining information relating to respective radio events designated by respective corresponding radios; and

selecting a radio event combination from among the respective radio events based on at least one of bins, scale factors, or history variables associated with the respective radio events.