PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS METHOD FOR IMPROVING AND EXPEDITING REALIZATION OF SYSTEM SAFETY, AVAILABILITY AND COST PERFORMANCE INCREASES

• US 20110066898A1
• Filed: 08/17/2010
• Published: 03/17/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 08/21/2009
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: KIHO Military Acquisition Consulting, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Ki Ho Military Acquisition Consulting, Inc.
• Inventors: MCRORY, Francis Xavier, SAUCEDO, Rogelio
• Application Number:
  US12/858,021
• Publication Number:
  US 20110066898A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 714/47.3
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/008 Reliability or availability analysis

Abstract

Predictive analysis systems and methods use and correlate data from historic events to identify trends and develop corrective maintenance and logistics actions in various technology areas, such as the transportation industry, the manufacturing industry, or any other suitable industry that experiences equipment failure. The predictive analysis method and also determines the adequacy and compliance of the requirements prior to the failure of a system in order to preemptively minimize and eliminate these negative outcomes. Current failure trends may be evaluated for one or several components of a given system, which may be the frequency of incidence of failure of one or more components of the system. Engineering instructions for repair may also be evaluated when a failure of one or more components of the system has taken place. On the basis of this information, future failure trends may be forecast and supply channels and maintenance and repair protocols may be updated in order to decrease component failure.

Claims

1. A computer-assisted method for increasing reliability of a system having a plurality of components, the computer including a processor and a data repository, the method comprising:

evaluating current failure trends of one or more of the components via the processor;

evaluating engineering instructions for repair resulting from a failure of the one or more components;

forecasting future failure trends based on the evaluated current failure trends; and

updating at least one of supply channels and maintenance and repair protocols based on the future failure trends and the evaluated engineering instructions.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

determining previously unrecognized critical safety items;

updating the at least one of supply channels and maintenance and repair protocols based on the previously unrecognized critical safety items.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein evaluating the current failure trends comprises:

performing a Pareto analysis of failures across the system to determine a priority for investigating the one or more failed components.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein evaluating current failure trends comprises:

analyzing failure description for all components of the system.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein evaluating the engineering instructions comprises:

performing a traceability process that includes performing discreet inspections of the one or more components of the system.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein evaluating the engineering instructions includes:

comparing the engineering instructions to engineering requirements for satisfying original or extended design life of the one or more components.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein evaluating the current failure trends comprises:

performing a correlation analysis to identify current damage, demand and effectiveness of corrective action trends for the system.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein evaluating the current failure trends includes:

assessing current scheduled repairs and purchases of replacement items.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein updating the at least one of supply channels and maintenance and repair protocols comprises:

developing alternative scheduled repair and purchase plans for meeting current and projected system support requirements.

10. The method of claim 5, further comprising:

revising engineering, maintenance and logistics documentation for updating the at least one of supply channels and maintenance and repair protocols.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein evaluating the engineering instructions for repair comprises:

evaluating at least one of logistics data, procurement data, contracting data, repair data, overhaul data, packaging data, handling data, shipping data, and storage data.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein evaluating the engineering instructions for repair comprises evaluating at least one selected from the group consisting of:

specifications from system concept through development, prototype, test, production and fielding;

documents relative to requirements for maintaining performance throughout an intended service life of the system based on testing, modeling;

test, analysis and modeling reports;

updates based on field experience and system modifications; and

responses to maintenance, logistics and other requests for assistance.

13. The method of claim 11, wherein the logistics data comprises at least one selected from the group consisting of:

technical data including illustrated parts breakdown manuals or documents describing the system and the plurality of components;

instructions for required facilities for system storage, shipping, repair, and operations;

packaging, handling and storage requirements at many assembly levels;

training requirements for maintenance, operations, supply support and functional support activities;

instructions for personnel resources required for system operation and support;

information on design interfaces with other systems;

instructions on supply support and test equipment; and

maintenance planning data.

19. The method of claim 1, wherein one or more of the updated at least one of supply channels and maintenance and repair protocols are displayed.

14. A system for increasing reliability of a system having a plurality of components, the system comprising:

a first evaluating module for evaluating current failure trends of one or more of the components;

a second evaluating module for evaluating engineering instructions for repair resulting from a failure of the one or more components;

a forecasting module for forecasting future failure trends based on the evaluated current failure trends; and

an updating module for updating at least one of supply channels and maintenance and repair protocols based on the future failure trends and the evaluated engineering instructions.

15. A system for increasing reliability of a system having a plurality of components, the system comprising:

a processor;

a user interface functioning via the processor; and

a repository accessible by the processor;

wherein;

current failure trends of one or more of the components are evaluated;

engineering instructions for repair resulting from a failure of the one or more components are evaluated;

future failure trends are forecasted based on the evaluated current failure trends; and

at least one of supply channels and maintenance and repair protocols are updated based on the future failure trends and the evaluated engineering instructions.

16. The system of claim 15, wherein the processor is on a server that is coupled to a network.

17. The system of claim 16, wherein the network is the Internet.

18. The system of claim 16, wherein the server is coupled to a network via one of a wired connection, a wireless connection, and a fiber-optic connection.