System and Method for Managing a Written Transaction

• US 20110066955A1
• Filed: 12/01/2008
• Published: 03/17/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 12/01/2008
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: VeraCarta Corporation
• Original Assignee: VeraCarta Corporation
• Inventors: Olson, Robert A., Wiedmann, Christian, Goines, Mark R., Jaideep, Sandhya K., Monahan, Kevin H.C.
• Application Number:
  US12/325,896
• Publication Number:
  US 20110066955A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 715/752
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/107 Computer-aided management of electronic mailing [e-mailing]
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 51/08 Annexed information, e.g. attachments
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 51/216 Handling conversation history, e.g. grouping of messages in sessions or threads
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 51/42 Mailbox-related aspects, e.g. synchronisation of mailboxes
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 51/48 Message addressing, e.g. address format or anonymous messages, aliases

Abstract

A system and method for managing transactions that include numerous documents and written electronic communications between a plurality of participants is disclosed. Communications and documents related to the transaction are obtained and analyzed to determine the relationships between them and the parties authorized to view each. The communications and documents are stored with the relationship data so that a participant may view authorized items in a manner that indicates the particular relationship in which the participant is interested.

Claims

1. A method for managing a written transaction between a plurality of participants in a computing system, comprising:

obtaining a plurality of communications that are related to the transaction;

obtaining a plurality of documents that are related to the transaction;

determining which participants are parties to each of the plurality of communications;

determining whether any of the documents are related to any of the communications;

determining any relationships between the communications;

determining any relationships between the documents;

storing the communications and documents and all of the determined relationships between them; and

displaying the communications and documents and the determined relationships between them on an electronic display in the computing system.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein a plurality of the communications are emails, and wherein determining which participants are parties to each of the plurality of communications further comprises determining the sender and recipients of each email.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein displaying the communications and documents and the determined relationships between them further comprises displaying the emails in groups according to the date sent.

4. The method of claim 2 wherein displaying the communications and documents and the determined relationships between them further comprises displaying the emails in groups according to the sender.

5. The method of claim 2 wherein displaying the communications and documents and the determined relationships between them further comprises displaying the emails in groups according to the recipient.

6. The method of claim 2 wherein displaying the communications and documents and the determined relationships between them further comprises displaying the emails in groups according to the subject lines of the emails.

7. The method of claim 2 wherein determining whether any of the documents are related to any of the communications further comprises determining whether any of the documents are attachments to any of the emails.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein determining any relationships between the documents further comprises determining whether two or more documents are near duplicates of each other.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein displaying the communications and documents and the determined relationships between them further comprises displaying the emails in groups in which each email has attached to it a document that is a near duplicate of a document attached to each other email in the group.

10. The method of claim 9 wherein displaying the communications and documents and the determined relationships between them further comprises displaying to one of the plurality of participants all communications to which the participant is a party.

11. The method of claim 7 wherein determining whether two or more documents are near duplicates of each other further comprises using a Dirichlet-smoothed Kullback-Leibler divergence as a baseline distance metric to drive clustering.

12. The method of claim 1 wherein determining any relationships between the documents further comprises determining whether two or more documents are near duplicates of each other.

13. The method of claim 12 wherein determining whether two or more documents are near duplicates of each other further comprises using a Dirichlet-smoothed Kullback-Leibler divergence as a baseline distance metric to drive clustering.

14. The method of claim 13 wherein the Dirichlet-smoothed Kullback-Leibler divergence uses the average of the two non-symmetric distance measures between the two documents as the baseline distance metric.

15. The method of claim 11 wherein displaying the communications and documents and the determined relationships between them further comprises displaying the documents in groups of documents in which each document in a group is a near duplicate of each other document in the group.

16. The method of claim 1 wherein displaying the communications and documents and the determined relationships between them further comprises displaying to one of the plurality of participants all communications to which the participant is a party.

17. A computing system for managing a written transaction between a plurality of participants, comprising:

input means for obtaining a plurality of communications and a plurality of documents that are related to the transaction;

a processor configured to;

determine which participants are parties to each of the plurality of communications;

determine whether any of the documents are related to any of the communications;

determine any relationships between the communications; and

determine any relationships between the documents;

a data storage device for storing the communications and documents and all of the determined relationships between them; and

an electronic display for displaying the communications and documents and the determined relationships between them.

18. The computing system of claim 17 wherein the processor is further configured to determine any relationships between the documents by determining whether two or more documents are near duplicates of each other.

19. The computing system of claim 18 wherein the processor is further configured to determine any relationships between the communications by determining whether any communication has attached to it a document that is a near duplicate of a document attached to another communication.

20. A computer-readable storage medium having embodied thereon a program, the program being executable by a processor to perform a method comprising:

obtaining a plurality of communications that are related to a written transaction between a plurality of participants;

obtaining a plurality of documents that are related to the transaction;

determining which participants are parties to each communication;

determining whether any of the documents are related to any of the communications;

determining any relationships between the communications;

determining any relationships between the documents;

storing the communications and documents and all of the relationships between them;

displaying the communications and documents and the relationships between them.