THERAPY RECONCILIATION FOR VENUE TRANSITION

• US 20110077954A1
• Filed: 09/25/2009
• Published: 03/31/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 09/25/2009
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Cerner Innovation, Inc. (Oracle Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Cerner Innovation, Inc. (Oracle Corporation)
• Inventors: PARMAN, ELIZABETH JEAN, HAN, LEI, MARTIN, CAROL ANN, SCHNEIDER, CHARLES FREDERICK, JENNINGS, BRITTON K.
• Application Number:
  US12/567,211
• Publication Number:
  US 20110077954A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/2
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 20/10 relating to drugs or medications, e.g. for ensuring correct administration to patients
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 40/67 for remote operation
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 50/20 for computer-aided diagnosis, e.g. based on medical expert systems
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 70/20 relating to practices or guidelines
• CPC Class Codes: G16Z 99/00 Subject matter not provided for in other main groups of this subclass

Abstract

The present invention is directed to selecting a therapy designation that is usable to identify a therapy when the therapy is implemented in a treatment venue. A therapy designation is received that identifies the therapy (e.g., administration of a medication) when the therapy is administered in a first treatment venue. Alternative therapy designations are referenced that are usable to identify the therapy when the therapy is implemented in a second treatment venue. An equivalent therapy designation is selected that, based on one or more rules, is most similar to the first therapy designation.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method, which is executed with one or more of a server and a computer storage medium, of selecting a therapy designation that is usable to identify a therapy when the therapy is implemented in a treatment venue, the method comprising:

receiving a first therapy designation that identifies the therapy when the therapy is implemented in a first treatment venue;

referencing in the computer storage medium one or more alternative therapy designations that are usable to identify the therapy when the therapy is implemented in a second treatment venue;

selecting by the server, from the one or more alternative therapy designations, an equivalent therapy designation that, based on one or more rules, is most similar to the first therapy designation; and

presenting the equivalent therapy designation to be used to identify the therapy in the second treatment venue.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the therapy includes administration of a dosage of medication that is achievable by administering a number of medication units that have a medication-unit strength.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2, wherein each of the one or more alternative therapy designations identify a respective medication-unit strength.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 2,

wherein at least one of the one or more rules is usable to select the equivalent therapy designation based on availability in the second treatment venue of the medication in a version that is specified by the first therapy designation, and

wherein a version of a medication includes one or more of a medication strength and a medication dosage.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein at least one of the one or more rules is usable to select the equivalent therapy designation based on dosage-achievability considerations, which are usable to evaluate whether a first dosage specified by the first therapy designation is achievable using respective strengths specified by each of the one or more alternative therapy designations.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein one of the one or more rules is usable to select the equivalent therapy designation based on form-similarity considerations, which specify an alternative medication form that is equivalent to a medication form specified by the first therapy designation.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein one of the one or more rules is usable to select the equivalent therapy designation based on whether a name specified by an alternative therapy designation is within a same naming convention as the therapy designation in the first treatment venue

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 further comprising:

receiving a request to present the one or more alternative therapy designations;

presenting the one or more alternative therapy designations;

receiving a selection of one of the one or more alternative therapy designations; and

presenting the one of the one or more alternative therapy designations to be used to identify the therapy in the second treatment venue.

9. A computer storage medium having stored thereon computer-executable instructions that, when executed, cause a computing device to perform a method of selecting a therapy designation that is usable to identify a therapy when the therapy is implemented in a treatment venue, the method comprising:

receiving a first therapy designation that identifies the therapy when the therapy is implemented in a first treatment venue;

referencing one or more alternative therapy designations that are usable to identify the therapy when the therapy is implemented in a second treatment venue;

selecting from the one or more alternative therapy designations an equivalent therapy designation that, based on one or more rules, is most similar to the first therapy designation; and

presenting the equivalent therapy designation to be used to identify the therapy in the second treatment venue.

10. The computer storage medium of claim 9,

wherein the first treatment venue includes an outpatient treatment venue, and

wherein the second treatment venue includes an inpatient treatment venue.

11. The computer storage medium of claim 9,

wherein the first treatment venue includes an inpatient treatment venue, and

wherein the second treatment venue includes an outpatient treatment venue.

12. The computer storage medium of claim 9,

wherein when the first therapy designation includes a medication dosage that is to be administered as part of the therapy, a dosage-achievability rule is used to evaluate the one or more alternative therapy designations;

wherein pursuant to the dosage-achievability rule, each of the one or more alternative therapy designations that includes a respective medication strength that is usable to achieve the medication dosage is a candidate to be selected as the equivalent therapy designation; and

wherein when none of the one or more alternative therapy designations specify a respective medication strength that is usable to achieve the medication dosage, all of the one or more alternative therapy designations are presented as options that are selectable by a user to identify the therapy in the second treatment venue.

13. The computer storage medium of claim 12, wherein when the one or more alternative therapy designations include both:

a first set of alternative therapy designations, each of which include a respective strength that requires a whole number of a medication unit to achieve a dosage of the therapy designation, and

a second set of alternative therapy designations, each of which includes a respective strength that requires a fractional number of a medication unit to achieve the dosage of the therapy designation, and

pursuant to the dosage-achievability rule, the alternative therapy designations of the first set are favored to the alternative therapy designations of the second set.

14. The computer storage medium of claim 12, wherein pursuant to the dosage-achievability rule, when an alternative therapy designation prescribes a strength that requires a whole number of medication units that is greater than five, the alternative therapy designation is not considered as a candidate to be selected as the equivalent therapy designation.

15. The computer storage medium of claim 12, wherein pursuant to the dosage-achievability rule, when an alternative therapy designation prescribes a strength that requires a fractional number of medication units that is not equal to one-half, the alternative therapy designation is not considered as a candidate to be selected as the equivalent therapy designation.

16. The computer storage medium of claim 9,

wherein when the first therapy designation specifies a medication form, a form-compatibility rule is used to evaluate the one or more alternative therapy designations;

and

wherein the form-compatibility rule specifies alternative medication forms that are equivalent to the medication form.

17. The computer storage medium of claim 9,

wherein when the first therapy designation includes a brand name of a medication, a brand-specificity rule is used to evaluate the one or more alternative therapy designations;

wherein pursuant to the brand-specificity rule, each of the one or more alternative therapy designations that specify a product of the brand name is a candidate to be selected as the equivalent therapy designation; and

wherein when none of the one or more alternative therapy designations specify the brand name, the one or more alternative therapy designations are presented as options that are selectable by a user to identify the therapy in the second treatment venue.

18. A system for selecting a therapy designation that is usable to identify a therapy when the therapy is implemented in a treatment venue, the system comprising:

a receiving component that is usable to receive a first therapy designation, which identifies the therapy when the therapy is implemented in a first treatment venue;

a therapy reconciler that references in a computer storage medium one or more alternative therapy designations that are usable to identify the therapy when the therapy is implemented in a second treatment venue;

a rules engine that provides the therapy reconciler with one or more rules, which are usable to select from the one or more alternative therapy designations an equivalent therapy designation that is similar to the first therapy designation; and

a presentation component that presents the equivalent therapy designation to be used to identify the therapy in the second treatment venue.

19. The system of claim 18, wherein the one or more rules include a dosage-achievability rule, a form-compatibility rule, and a brand-specificity rule.

20. The system of claim 18, wherein the receiving component includes a graphical user interface and wherein the graphical user interface includes:

a medication-input portion that allows a user to input a first therapy designation;

a therapy-reconciliation-results portion that is usable to display the matching therapy designation, which is selected based on the one or more rules; and

a details-entry portion that allows a user to input instructions that describe administration of the matching therapy designation.