System and Method for Evaluating Supplier Quality

• US 20110087613A1
• Filed: 10/06/2010
• Published: 04/14/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 10/08/2009
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: eVendor Check, Inc.
• Original Assignee: eVendor Check, Inc.
• Inventors: Cole, Steven, Herlihy, Joyce, LaPasta, Douglas, Grilk, Andrew, Yanoff, Marc
• Application Number:
  US12/899,145
• Publication Number:
  US 20110087613A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/347
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0282 Rating or review of business operators or products

Abstract

Supplier evaluation system for selecting a supplier for a project and/or monitoring a current supplier'"'"'s performance. A supplier evaluation system first comprises a first database storing a plurality of inquiries and supplier contact information. The supplier candidates identify raters and those raters receive the inquiries over a computer network. The system provides a user interface for the rater to confidentially respond to the inquiries. The raters'"'"' responses are then electronically sent to one or more databases in the system and the system'"'"'s database management system analyses the responses and makes them available to purchasing agents in a plurality of formats.

Claims

1. A supplier evaluation system to qualify a supplier for a project, said system comprising:

(a) a central processing unit;

(b) a database management system;

(c) a first electronic database storing a plurality of inquiries related to supplier competency and quality;

(d) a network-communication means for communicating electronic information;

(e) a first user interface wherein a customer may select from said inquiries and identify supplier candidates;

(f) a second user interface wherein said supplier candidates identify one or more raters;

(g) a third user interface wherein said plurality of inquiries stored in said first database are communicated to said raters via said network-communication means and said raters'"'"' responses to said plurality of inquiries are communicated to, via said network-communication means, and stored in said first database;

(h) said data processor compiling and converting said raters'"'"' responses to provide qualitative and quantitative analysis of a supplier based on said raters'"'"' responses;

(i) a means of separating said analysis from said raters'"'"' responses so that said raters'"'"' responses are kept confidential;

(j) a second database storing said analysis; and

(k) a forth user interface wherein said analysis stored in said second database is communicated to and manipulated by a customer.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein not all of said raters are selected by said customer.

3. The system of claim 1, wherein said plurality of inquiries are in a language other than English.

4. The system of claim 1, wherein said rater responses are in a language other than English.

5. The system of claim 1, wherein said database management system is further operable to provide a comparison of said analysis for one supplier against similar analysis for one or more other suppliers.

6. The system of claim 1, further comprising a means to automatically attempt to determine which supplier was selected by said customer.

7. The system of claim 1, wherein said customer selects one or more of said inquiries.

8. The system of claim 1, further comprising a means to update said inquiries stored in said first database.

9. The system of claim 1, further comprising a means to update said analysis stored in said second database.

10. A method for evaluating supplier competence and abilities, said method comprising the steps of:

(a) transmitting a set of inquiries to one or more raters over an electronic network;

(b) collecting and storing said raters'"'"' responses to said inquiries in an electronic database;

(c) using an encrypting means to separate certain of said stored responses from the identity of the rater who provided said response;

(d) compiling and processing said stored responses with a data processor to create a supplier analysis; and

(e) communicating said analysis to a customer.

11. The method of claim 10, further comprising the step of automatically attempting to determine which supplier was selected by said customer.

12. The method of claim 10, further comprising the step of updating said supplier analysis.