METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR AUTOMATICALLY ENSURING CONSISTENCY AMONG MULTIPLE SPECTRUM DATABASES

• US 20110087639A1
• Filed: 09/23/2010
• Published: 04/14/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 10/12/2009
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Motorola Solutions, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Motorola, Inc. (Motorola Solutions, Inc.)
• Inventors: Gurney, David P.
• Granted Patent: US 8,589,359 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 707/690
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/2453 Query optimisation
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/283 Multi-dimensional databases or data warehouses, e.g. MOLAP or ROLAP

Abstract

An apparatus and method of providing accurate and consistent open spectrum results for secondary devices from different geo-location databases is presented. The results, which may be independently derived by each database, are independent of the database queried. The comparison permits some amount of latitude in spatial and temporal consistency between the databases as errors are only indicated if the temporal or spatial discrepancies are pervasive. In addition, large percentages of different locations showing discrepancies when compared also lead to corrective action being taken. Corrective actions that may be taken include forcing problematic databases to update, shunting requests by secondary devices in the problematic locations to acceptable databases or shutting down the problematic databases entirely.

Claims

1. A method for verifying accuracy of geo-location databases, comprising:

determining at least one geographical location to access;

accessing at least one geo-location database with said geographical location, to obtain database results;

comparing the obtained database results to a reference result; and

establishing an error condition for any comparisons that exceed an allowed pre-determined difference.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein determining further comprises selecting a set of geographical locations to access, based on one of the following:

a random pattern of locations;

a pre-determined pattern of locations.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the reference result is determined by one of the following:

a regulatory database, an approved reference calculation, a second geo-location database.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the reference result is determined by an average result from other geo-location databases.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of establishing further comprises:

allowing a pre-determined difference to exist between the database results and the reference results within a pre-determined time period limit without establishing an error condition; and

allowing a pre-determined difference to exist between the database results and the reference results within a pre-determined spatial distance limit without establishing an error condition.

6. The method of claim 2, wherein the step of establishing further comprises allowing a pre-determined difference to exist between the database results and the reference results within a pre-determined time period limit without establishing an error condition.

7. The method of claim 2, wherein the step of establishing further comprises allowing a pre-determined difference to exist between the database results and the reference results within a pre-determined spatial distance limit without establishing an error condition.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of determining at least one geographical location to access further comprises selecting a channel to query.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein said database results comprise one of the following:

a channel availability, a maximum allowed transmit power level, a maximum allowed transmission bandwidth, a maximum allowed transmission time.

10. The method of claim 2, wherein the step of establishing further comprises establishing an error when an overall level of correlation is not maintained between the database results and the reference results.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein the method is performed on a periodic basis.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the reference result is determined by a majority of results from other geo-location databases.

13. The method of claim 1, further comprising shutting down the geo-location database in response to a pre-determined number of errors being established.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein shutting down the geo-location database further comprises sourcing database results from another geo-location database.

15. A geo-location database system, comprising:

a geo-location database consistency checking mechanism;

a plurality of geo-location databases, each providing database results based on a queried location;

the geo-location database consistency checking mechanism transmitting location information to the plurality of geo-location databases, the geo-location database consistency checking mechanism determining spatial and temporal discrepancies between the geo-location database results; and

the geo-location database consistency checking mechanism determining whether the spatial and temporal discrepancies exceed allowable error levels, and noting an error condition if said allowable levels are exceeded.

16. The geo-location database system of claim 15, wherein the geo-location database consistency checking mechanism determines temporal discrepancies by performing a comparison of the database results from each geo-location database over a specified period of time to determine whether the temporal discrepancies are less than a predetermined allowable level.

17. The geo-location database system of claim 15, wherein the geo-location database consistency checking mechanism determines spatial discrepancies by performing a comparison of the database results from each geo-location database between at least two diametrically opposed location points surrounding the queried location to determine whether the spatial discrepancies are less than a predetermined allowable level.

18. The cognitive radio system of claim 17, wherein the spatial discrepancies are measured in a direction normal to the predetermined protected area contour.

19. The cognitive radio system of claim 15, wherein the geo-location database consistency checking mechanism takes corrective action in response to an error condition being noted.

20. The cognitive radio system of claim 19, wherein the corrective action comprises at least one of:

updating the geo-location database having the error condition, shunting requests to other databases, or shutting down the geo-location database having the error condition.