Methods for modeling the structural health of a civil structure based on electronic distance measurements

• US 20110093219A1
• Filed: 12/20/2010
• Published: 04/21/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 12/04/2008
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Laura P. Solliday, Sophie Lin, Trustee Of The John Michael Payne Family Trust
• Original Assignee: Laura P. Solliday, Sophie Lin, Trustee Of The John Michael Payne Family Trust
• Inventors: Lin, Sophie, Payne, John M., Parker, David H.
• Granted Patent: US 8,209,134 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 702/34
• CPC Class Codes: G01B 11/03 by measuring coordinates of points
• CPC Class Codes: G01B 11/16 for measuring the deformation in a solid, e.g. optical strain gauge
• CPC Class Codes: G01C 15/002 Active optical surveying means optical plumbing G01C15/105

Abstract

Methods are disclosed wherein the structural health of a civil structure, such as, but not limited to, a bridge or the like is measured by electronic distance measurement (EDM) from a plurality of stable locations to a plurality of cardinal points on the structure in a methodical manner. By measuring the coordinates of the cardinal points, the dynamic and long-term static behavior of the structure provide an indication of the health of the structure. Analysis includes: comparison to a Finite Element Model (FEM); comparison to historical data; and modeling based on linearity, hysteresis, symmetry, creep, damping coefficient, and harmonic analysis.

Claims

1. A method for measuring structural health of a civil structure by experimentally testing a finite element model of the civil structure, with steps comprising:

(a) programming the finite element model of the civil structure, wherein the civil structure is selected from the group consisting of a bridge, a building, a crane, a tower, a dam, and an amusement park ride;

(b) identifying a first cardinal point on the civil structure;

(c) determining a first set of theoretical coordinates of the first cardinal point, wherein the first set of theoretical coordinates are determined based at least in part on the finite element model for the first cardinal point;

(d) attaching at least one retroreflective target to the first cardinal point, wherein the retroreflective target attached to the first cardinal point has a known mechanical relationship and a known optical relationship with respect to the first cardinal point;

(e) measuring at least a first range from a first electronic distance measurement to the first cardinal point, a second range from a second electronic distance measurement instrument to the first cardinal point, and a third range from a third electronic distance measurement instrument to the first cardinal point;

wherein the first electronic distance measurement instrument is at a first location, the second electronic distance measurement instrument is at a second location, the third electronic distance measurement instrument is at a third location;

the first location, the second location, and the third location are three different locations in a stable reference coordinate system; and

the first, second, and third electronic distance measurement instruments are coordinated by a central processor;

(f) determining a first set of experimental coordinates of the first cardinal point, wherein the first set of experimental coordinates is determined at least in part based on the first range, the second range, and the third range;

(g) determining a first residual vector from the first set of theoretical coordinates to the first set of experimental coordinates; and

(h) determining at least a first structural health parameter of the civil structure based at least in part on the first residual vector.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the first structural health parameter is based on a magnitude of the first residual vector.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the first structural health parameter is based on a direction of the first residual vector.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the programming of the finite element model is adjusted based at least in part on the first set of experimental coordinates.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising steps of:

(a) identifying a second cardinal point on the civil structure;

(b) determining a second set of theoretical coordinates of the second cardinal point, wherein the second set of theoretical coordinates is determined based at least in part on the finite element model for the second cardinal point;

(c) attaching at least one retroreflective target to the second cardinal point, wherein the retroreflective target attached to the second cardinal point has a known mechanical relationship and a known optical relationship with respect to the second cardinal point;

(d) measuring at least a fourth range from the first electronic distance measurement to the second cardinal point, a fifth range from the second electronic distance measurement instrument to the second cardinal point, and a sixth range from the third electronic distance measurement instrument to the second cardinal point;

(e) determining a second set of experimental coordinates of the second cardinal point, wherein the second set of experimental coordinates is determined at least in part based on the fourth range, the fifth range, and the sixth range;

(f) determining a second residual vector from the second set of theoretical coordinates to the second set of experimental coordinates; and

(g) determining at least a second structural health parameter of the civil structure based at least in part on the second residual vector.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein all of the steps of claim 1 and claim 5 are repeated for a plurality of load conditions for the civil structure.

7. The method of claim 5, wherein all of the steps of claim 1 and claim 5 are repeated for a plurality of stages of construction for the civil structure.

8. The method of claim 5, wherein all of the steps of claim 1 and claim 5 are repeated for a plurality of times, and wherein a period for the plurality of times is less than 0.5×

a period for a lowest natural frequency for the civil structure.

9. The method of claim 5, wherein the programming of the finite element model is adjusted based at least in part on the first set of experimental coordinates and the second set of experimental coordinates.

10. A method for measuring structural health of a civil structure, with steps comprising:

(a) identifying at least one characteristic behavior of the civil structure, wherein the characteristic behavior is based at least in part on linearity, symmetry, hysteresis, creep, vibration, damping coefficient, or combinations thereof, and wherein the civil structure is selected from the group consisting of a bridge, a building, a crane, a tower, a dam, and an amusement park ride;

(b) identifying a first cardinal point on the civil structure;

(c) attaching at least one retroreflective target to the first cardinal point, wherein the retroreflective target attached to the first cardinal point has a known mechanical relationship and a known optical relationship with respect to the first cardinal point;

(d) measuring at least a first range from a first electronic distance measurement to the first cardinal point, a second range from a second electronic distance measurement instrument to the first cardinal point, and a third range from a third electronic distance measurement instrument to the first cardinal point;

wherein the first electronic distance measurement instrument is at a first location, the second electronic distance measurement instrument is at a second location, the third electronic distance measurement instrument is at a third location;

the first location, the second location, and the third location are three different locations in a stable reference coordinate system; and

the first, second, and third electronic distance measurement instruments are coordinated by a central processor;

(e) determining a first set of experimental coordinates of the first cardinal point, wherein the first set of experimental coordinates is determined at least in part based on the first range, the second range, and the third range;

(f) identifying a second cardinal point on the civil structure;

(g) attaching at least one retroreflective target to the second cardinal point, wherein the retroreflective target attached to the second cardinal point has a known mechanical relationship and a known optical relationship with respect to the second cardinal point;

(h) measuring at least a fourth range from the first electronic distance measurement to the second cardinal point, a fifth range from the second electronic distance measurement instrument to the second cardinal point, and a sixth range from the third electronic distance measurement instrument to the second cardinal point;

(i) determining a second set of experimental coordinates of the second cardinal point, wherein the second set of experimental coordinates is determined at least in part based on the fourth range, the fifth range, and the sixth range;

(j) determining at least one structural health parameter of the civil structure based at least in part on the first set of experimental coordinates, the second set of experimental coordinates, and the at least one characteristic behavior of the civil structure.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein all of the steps are repeated for a plurality of load conditions for the civil structure.

12. The method of claim 10, wherein all of the steps are repeated for a plurality of stages of construction for the civil structure.

13. The method of claim 10, wherein all of the steps are repeated for a plurality of times, and wherein a period for the plurality of times is less than 0.5×

a period for a lowest natural frequency for the civil structure.