ENSURING ACCEPTABILITY OF SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENTS OR LEGAL AGREEMENTS

• US 20110093402A1
• Filed: 06/28/2010
• Published: 04/21/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 10/15/2009
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: GUPTA, PRAMOD
• Application Number:
  US12/825,275
• Publication Number:
  US 20110093402A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/317
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/10 Protecting distributed programs or content, e.g. vending or licensing of copyrighted material protection in video systems or pay television H04N7/16 ; Digital rights management [DRM]
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/018 Certifying business or products

Abstract

Techniques for ensuring acceptability of legal agreements entered into as part of a computer-facilitated workflow, e.g., for accepting a license agreement while installing software on a computer system owned by an organization. If the license has an approved status in an agreements database, the user can accept the license agreement during the software install process. If the license has a disapproved status in the agreements database, the user then rejects the license agreement during the software install process (or an install mechanism may simply aborts installation of the software). The process for other computer-facilitated workflows is similar.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method for ensuring acceptability of an agreement entered into as part of a computer-facilitated workflow, the method comprising:

receiving, from a user engaging in the computer-facilitated workflow, a text representation of a first agreement presented to the user as a step of the computer-facilitated workflow;

comparing, by operation of a processor, the text representation of the first agreement to a text representation of a plurality of agreements stored in an agreements database;

determining, in response to the comparison, whether a first agreement matches a second agreement, the second agreement having an assigned status in the agreements database; and

transmitting, over a data communications network, an indication to the user of the assigned status of the second agreement.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the assigned status is selected from at least one of an approved status, a disapproved status, and a pending status.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the assigned status in the agreements database is determined based on a role assigned to the user engaging in the computer-facilitated workflow.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, further comprising:

in response to determining the first agreement does not match the second agreement;

determining that the first agreement has a similarity score that exceeds a user specified threshold relative to a third agreement in the agreements database, the third agreement having an assigned status in the agreements database,

identifying textual differences between the first agreement and the third agreement, and

presenting an indication of the identified textual differences to the user.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 4, further comprising, receiving, from the user, an indication of whether to assign, to the first agreement, the status assigned to the third agreement.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, further comprising:

in response to determining the first agreement does not match the second agreement;

transmitting the text representation of the first agreement to a reviewing entity,

receiving, from the reviewing entity, a status to assign to the first agreement, and

storing a record in the agreements database, the record indicating the status assigned to the first agreement by the reviewing entity.

7. A computer-readable storage medium containing a program which, when executed by a processor, performs an operation for ensuring acceptability of an agreement entered into as part of a computer-facilitated workflow, the operation comprising:

receiving, from a user engaging in the computer-facilitated workflow, a text representation of a first agreement presented to the user as a step of the computer-facilitated workflow;

comparing, by operation of a processor, the text representation of the first agreement to a text representation of a plurality of agreements stored in an agreements database;

determining, in response to the comparison, whether a first agreement matches a second agreement, the second agreement having an assigned status in the agreements database; and

transmitting, over a data communications network, an indication to the user of the assigned status of the second agreement.

8. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 7, wherein the assigned status is selected from at least one of an approved status, a disapproved status, and a pending status.

9. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 7, wherein the agreement is a software license agreement and the computer-facilitated workflow comprises a software installation process.

10. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 7, wherein the assigned status in the agreements database is determined based on a role assigned to the user engaging in the computer-facilitated workflow.

11. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 7, wherein the operation further comprises:

in response to determining the first agreement does not match the second agreement;

determining that the first agreement has a similarity score that exceeds a user specified threshold relative to a third agreement in the agreements database, the third agreement having an assigned status in the agreements database,

identifying textual differences between the first agreement and the third agreement, and

presenting an indication of the identified textual differences to the user.

12. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 11, wherein the operation further comprises, receiving, from the user, an indication of whether to assign, to the first agreement, the status assigned to the third agreement.

13. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 7, wherein the operation further comprises:

in response to determining the first agreement does not match the second agreement;

transmitting the text representation of the first agreement to a reviewing entity,

receiving, from the reviewing entity, a status to assign to the first agreement, and

storing a record in the agreements database, the record indicating the status assigned to the first agreement by the reviewing entity.

14. A system, comprising:

one or more computer processors; and

a memory containing a program, which when executed by the one or more computer processors is configured to perform an operation for ensuring acceptability of an agreement entered into as part of a computer-facilitated workflow, the operation comprising;

receiving, from a user engaging in the computer-facilitated workflow, a text representation of a first agreement presented to the user as a step of the computer-facilitated workflow,

comparing, by operation of a processor, the text representation of the first agreement to a text representation of a plurality of agreements stored in an agreements database,

determining, in response to the comparison, whether a first agreement matches a second agreement, the second agreement having an assigned status in the agreements database, and

transmitting, over a data communications network, an indication to the user of the assigned status of the second agreement.

15. The system of claim 14, wherein the assigned status is selected from at least one of an approved status, a disapproved status, and a pending status.

16. The system of claim 14, wherein the agreement is a software license agreement and the computer-facilitated workflow comprises a software installation process.

17. The system of claim 14, wherein the assigned status in the agreements database is determined based on a role assigned to the user engaging in the computer-facilitated workflow.

18. The system of claim 14, wherein the operation further comprises:

in response to determining the first agreement does not match the second agreement;

determining that the first agreement has a similarity score that exceeds a user specified threshold relative to a third agreement in the agreements database, the third agreement having an assigned status in the agreements database,

identifying textual differences between the first agreement and the third agreement, and

presenting an indication of the identified textual differences to the user.

19. The system of claim 18, wherein the operation further comprises, receiving, from the user, an indication of whether to assign, to the first agreement, the status assigned to the third agreement.

20. The system of claim 14, wherein the operation further comprises:

in response to determining the first agreement does not match the second agreement;

transmitting the text representation of the first agreement to a reviewing entity,

receiving, from the reviewing entity, a status to assign to the first agreement, and

storing a record in the agreements database, the record indicating the status assigned to the first agreement by the reviewing entity.

21. A computer-implemented method for ensuring acceptability of a software license entered into as part of a software installation workflow, the method comprising:

receiving, from a user engaging in the software installation process, a text representation of the software license presented to the user as a step of the software installation process;

comparing, by operation of a processor, the text representation of the software license to a text representation of a plurality of software licenses stored in a database;

determining, in response to the comparison, whether the software license matches at least a second software license in the database, the second software license having an assigned status in the agreements database; and

transmitting, over a data communications network, an indication to the user of the assigned status of the second software license agreement.

22. The computer-implemented method of claim 21, further comprising:

in response to determining the assigned status of the second license agreement is an approved status, installing a software application associated with the first license agreement.

23. The computer-implemented method of claim 21, further comprising:

in response to determining the software license does not match the second software license;

transmitting the text representation of the software license to a reviewing entity,

receiving, from the reviewing entity, a status to assign to the software license, and

storing a record in the database, the record indicating the status assigned to the software license by the reviewing entity.