Infrastructure System Management Based Upon Evaluated Reliability

• US 20110099043A1
• Filed: 06/17/2008
• Published: 04/28/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 06/17/2008
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP (Hewlett-Packard Enterprise Company)
• Original Assignee: Hewlett-Packard Company (HP Inc.)
• Inventors: Shih, Chih C., Sharma, Ratnesh Kumar, Shah, Amip J., Bash, Cullen E., Patel, Chandrakant
• Application Number:
  US12/999,615
• Publication Number:
  US 20110099043A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/7.28
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/0635 Risk analysis of enterprise or organisation activities
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 99/00 Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass

Abstract

In a method of managing a structure having an infrastructure system, a plurality of candidate components configured to provide redundancy to the infrastructure system are identified. Reliability levels of the structure are evaluated with a plurality of different combinations of candidate components. In addition, the structure is managed based upon the evaluated reliability levels.

Claims

1. A method of managing a structure having an infrastructure system, said method comprising:

identifying a plurality of candidate components configured to provide redundancy to the infrastructure system, such that, a reliability level of the structure is increased through inclusion of the plurality of candidate components in the infrastructure system;

evaluating reliability levels of the structure with a plurality of different combinations of candidate components; and

managing the structure based upon the evaluated reliability levels.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein evaluating reliability levels further comprises evaluating whether the reliability levels of the structure with the different combinations of candidate components meets a predefined reliability level, and wherein managing the structure further comprises outputting whether the different combinations of candidate components meets the predefined reliability level.

3. The method according to claim 2, further comprising:

determining a metric associated with at least one of installing and operating the different combinations of candidate components;

identifying a combination of candidate components that meets the predefined reliability level and is associated with relatively lower metric levels; and

wherein managing the structure further comprises outputting the identified combination of candidate components.

4. The method according to claim 1, further comprising:

identifying parameters related to the structure and to the infrastructure system;

selecting a plurality of components for use in the structure and the infrastructure system configured to meet the identified parameters;

obtaining reliability data of the plurality of components; and

wherein evaluating reliability levels of the structure further comprises evaluating the reliability levels based upon the reliability data of the plurality of components.

5. The method according to claim 4, wherein evaluating reliability levels of the structure further comprises evaluating a reliability level of the structure with one candidate component removed from the infrastructure system, said method further comprising:

determining whether the reliability level with the one candidate component removed meets a predefined reliability level; and

wherein managing the structure further comprises outputting the determination of whether the reliability level with one less candidate component meets the predefined reliability level.

6. The method according to claim 5, further comprising:

in response to the reliability level with the one candidate component removed meeting the predefined reliability level, determining whether another candidate component is removable;

selecting another candidate component to remove in response to a determination that the another candidate component is available for removal;

evaluating a reliability level of the structure with the another candidate component removed;

determining whether the reliability level with the another candidate component removed meets a predefined reliability level; and

wherein managing the structure further comprises outputting the determination of whether the reliability level with the another candidate component meets the predefined reliability level.

7. The method according to claim 6, further comprising:

in response to a determination that another candidate component is not available for removal, outputting a result of the evaluation with the one candidate component removed from the infrastructure system.

8. The method according to claim 5, further comprising:

in response to the reliability level with the one candidate component removed failing to meet the predefined reliability level, re-inserting the removed candidate component and determining whether a different candidate component is available for removal;

selecting a different candidate component to remove in response to a to determination that a different candidate component is available for removal;

evaluating a reliability level of the structure with the different candidate component removed;

determining whether the reliability level with the different candidate component removed meets a predefined reliability level; and

outputting the determination of whether the reliability level with the one different candidate component removed meets the predefined reliability level;

in response to a determination that a different candidate component is not available for removal, re-selecting a plurality of components for use in the structure and the infrastructure system;

obtaining reliability data of the plurality of components;

wherein evaluating reliability levels of the structure further comprises evaluating the reliability levels based upon the reliability data of the re-selected plurality of components; and

outputting a result of the evaluation with the re-selected plurality of components.

9. The method according to claim 5, further comprising

evaluating a break even point between cost and reliability of the plurality of components in the infrastructure system by comparing degradation of reliability and availability of the plurality of components with at least one of depreciation and amortization costs associated with the plurality of components.

10. The method according to claim 1, wherein managing the structure further comprises synthesizing the structure to have a plurality of zones, wherein at least two of the zones include respective infrastructure systems having different reliability levels.

11. A computer-implemented tool for managing a structure having an infrastructure system, said computer-implemented tool comprising:

a candidate component identification module configured to identify a plurality of candidate components configured to provide redundancy to the infrastructure system, such that, a reliability level of the structure is increased through inclusion of the plurality of candidate components in the infrastructure system;

a reliability level evaluation module configured to evaluate reliability levels of the structure with a plurality of different combinations of candidate components; and

an output module configured to output the reliability levels with the different combinations of candidate components.

12. The computer-implemented tool according to claim 11, further comprising:

an input module configured to communicate with one or more inputs, wherein the input module is further configured to identify parameters related to the structure and to the infrastructure system based upon data received from the one or more inputs;

a metric determination module configured to determine metric levels associated with at least one of installing and operating the different combinations of candidate components, wherein the reliability level evaluation module is further configured to identify a combination of candidate components that meets the predefined reliability level and is associated with relatively lower metric levels; and

wherein the output module is further configured to output the identified combination of candidate components.

13. The computer-implemented tool according to claim 11, further comprising:

a candidate component removal module configured to select one or more candidate components to remove from the infrastructure system;

wherein the reliability level evaluation module is further configured to evaluate a reliability level of the structure with the one or more candidate components removed from the infrastructure system and to determine whether the reliability level meets a predefined reliability level; and

wherein the output module is further configured to output the determination of whether the reliability level meets the predefined reliability level.

14. A computer readable storage medium on which is embedded one or more computer programs, said one or more computer programs implementing a method of evaluating reliability of an infrastructure system in a structure, said one or more computer programs comprising a set of instructions for:

identifying a plurality of candidate components configured to provide redundancy to the infrastructure system, such that, a reliability level of the structure is increased through inclusion of the plurality of candidate components in the infrastructure system;

evaluating reliability levels of the structure with a plurality of different combinations of candidate components; and

outputting the reliability levels with the different combinations of candidate components.

15. The computer readable storage medium according to claim 14, said one or more computer programs further comprising a set of instructions for:

identifying parameters related to the structure and to the infrastructure system;

selecting a plurality of components for use in the structure and the infrastructure system configured to meet the identified parameters;

obtaining reliability data of the plurality of components; and

wherein evaluating reliability levels of the structure further comprises evaluating the reliability levels based upon the reliability data of the plurality of components.