Computer-Based System and Method for Automating the Settlement of Debts

• US 20110119169A1
• Filed: 11/13/2010
• Published: 05/19/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 11/13/2009
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Anthony Passero, Efrain Antonio Garcia Poveda, Kevin L. Ellis
• Original Assignee: Anthony Passero, Efrain Antonio Garcia Poveda, Kevin L. Ellis
• Inventors: Ellis, Kevin, Passero, Anthony, Garcia Poveda, Efrain Antonio
• Application Number:
  US12/945,841
• Publication Number:
  US 20110119169A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/35
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/00 Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/02 Banking, e.g. interest calculation or account maintenance credit or loans G06Q40/03

Abstract

The present invention is a method and system for facilitating a settlement negotiation of a debt between a debtor and a creditor whereby settlement proposals are automatically and intelligently generated, based upon the financial circumstances of the debtor and a pattern of decision-making behavior of the creditor, and are sent throughout the duration of the negotiation process until an acceptable proposal is secured. Furthermore, the present invention also provides an automatic, streamlined framework for the user or client to budget for and carry through with payment of the debt in accordance with the agreed upon settlement. This negotiation and settlement process occurs without any direct contact between the debtor and the creditor, or an outside intermediary, by automating a significant part of the negotiation and repayment process whereby the process is transparent and visible to the debtor and creditor.

Claims

1. A system for facilitating a settlement negotiation of a debt between a debtor and a creditor, comprising:

at least one database operable to store user-entered data figures that reflect information about at least one account of which the debtor is in debt;

a computerized portal;

directly accessible to at least one debtor through a debtor user-interface;

directly accessible to at least one creditor through a creditor user-interface; and

being in communication with the at least one database to permit data entry by the debtor of the data figures through the debtor user-interface and storage of the data figures into the at least one database;

a computer system in communicative contact with the at least one database and the portal and programmed to;

generate a score associated with the at least one account and dependent upon the data figures, the score being a criterion to determine if the at least one account is eligible for settlement;

automatically generate an initial settlement offer based at least in part upon the data figures, if the at least one account is eligible for settlement; and

automatically relay the initial settlement offer to the respective creditor of the at least one account;

permit the creditor to access the initial settlement offer, through the creditor user-interface, and directly act upon the initial settlement offer; and

store in the at least one database action information corresponding to action taken by the creditor on the initial settlement offer; and

make the action information directly visible to the debtor when the debtor subsequently accesses the action information through debtor user-interface.

2. The system according to claim 1, wherein access to the portal requires a secure password.

3. The system according to claim 1, wherein the data figures reflect information selected from at least:

a balance owed by the debtor on the at least one account;

a date on which the account was past due;

an identity of the respective creditor of the account; and

an amount of the debtor'"'"'s income.

4. The system according to claim 1, wherein the computer system is programmed to automatically generate the score after the user-entered data figures are stored in the at least one database.

5. The system according to claim 1, wherein:

the at least one database is operable to store a creditor behavior profile of the at least one creditor; and

the computer system is programmed to generate the creditor behavior profile dependent upon each action taken by the creditor in response to at least the initial settlement offer.

6. The system according to claim 5, wherein the computer system is programmed to:

carry out a debtor-to-creditor communication process that exchanges at least one additional settlement offer after the initial settlement offer;

alter the creditor behavior profile dependent upon each action taken by the creditor in response to at least the initial settlement offer and the at least one additional settlement offer; and

predict an action the creditor will likely take on at least one of at least the initial settlement offer and the at least one additional settlement offer based upon each action taken by the creditor in response to a settlement offer that is similar to at least one of the initial settlement offer and the at least one additional settlement offer.

7. The system according to claim 6, wherein the creditor behavior profile is automatically updated each time the creditor takes an action in response to at least one of the initial settlement offer and the at least one additional settlement offer.

8. The system according to claim 6, wherein the computer system is programmed to base the initial settlement offer at least in part upon the prediction from the creditor behavior profile.

9. The system according to claim 1, wherein the action taken by the creditor is selected from one of:

an acceptance of the initial settlement offer;

a rejection of the initial settlement offer; and

a counter settlement offer to the initial settlement offer.

10. The system according to claim 9, wherein the computer system is programmed to automatically generate a new settlement offer and relay the new settlement offer to the creditor if the creditor rejects the initial settlement offer.

11. The system according to claim 6, wherein:

the at least one database is operable to;

store a user-entered debtor profile comprised of profile information entered by the debtor through the debtor user-interface, the profile information reflecting a financial condition of the debtor and including a range of possible settlement offers based at least in part on the information reflecting the financial condition of the debtor; and

store a creditor behavior profile comprised of each past action taken by the creditor in response to at least one of the initial settlement offer and the at least one additional settlement offer; and

the computer system is programmed to predict what action the creditor will likely take on any given settlement offer based upon each past action taken by the creditor in response to at least one of the initial settlement offer and the at least one additional settlement offer similar to the given settlement offer, the new settlement offer being within the range of possible settlement offers in the debtor profile and dependent at least in part upon at least one of the prediction and the creditor behavior profile.

12. The system according to claim 9, wherein, upon receipt of a counter settlement offer, the computer system is programmed to provide the debtor with a choice selected from one of:

accept the counter settlement offer of the creditor;

reject the counter settlement offer of the creditor; and

counter the counter settlement offer of the creditor.

13. The system according to claim 12, wherein the computer system is programmed to:

permit direct debtor access to the choice of accepting, rejecting, or countering the counter settlement offer;

store in the at least one database the choice of the debtor; and

visibly display the choice to the creditor through the creditor user-interface upon subsequent creditor access of the portal.

14. The system according to claim 12, wherein:

the at least one database is operable to;

store a user-entered debtor profile comprised of profile information entered by the debtor through the debtor user-interface, the profile information reflecting a financial condition of the debtor and including a range of possible settlement offers based at least in part on the information reflecting the financial condition of the debtor; and

store a creditor behavior profile comprised of each action taken by the creditor in response to at least one of the initial settlement offer and the at least one additional settlement offer; and

the computer system is programmed to one of accept, reject, and counter the creditor'"'"'s counter settlement offer on behalf of the debtor based at least in part on whether or not the counter settlement offer of the creditor is within the range of possible settlement offers.

15. A method for facilitating a settlement negotiation of a debt, which comprises:

directly accessing a computerized portal by at least one debtor using a user-interface, the portal being in communication with at least one database;

inputting into the portal data figures that reflect information about at least one account of which the at least one debtor is in debt;

storing the data figures in the at least one database;

analyzing the data figures to give the at least one account a score;

determining if the at least one account is eligible for settlement using the score as a criterion and, if the account is eligible for settlement;

automatically generating an initial settlement offer based at least in part upon the data figures;

automatically relaying the initial settlement offer to a respective creditor of the at least one account;

acting upon the initial settlement offer by directly accessing the portal by the creditor using the user-interface;

storing the action of the creditor in the at least one database; and

making the creditor'"'"'s action directly visible to the debtor upon subsequent debtor access of the portal.

16. The method according to claim 15, wherein access to the portal requires a secure password.

17. The method according to claim 15, wherein the data figures reflect at least:

the balance owed by the debtor on the at least one account;

the date on which the account was past due;

the identity of the respective creditor of the account; and

the amount of the debtor'"'"'s income.

18. The method according to claim 15, wherein the analyzing step to generate the score is carried out automatically after the data figures are stored in the at least one database.

19. The method according to claim 15, which further comprises:

storing a creditor behavior profile in the at least one database, the creditor behavior profile being comprised of each past action taken by the creditor in response to a settlement offer; and

utilizing the creditor behavior profile, predicting what action the creditor will likely take on any given settlement offer based upon each past action taken by the creditor in response to a settlement offer that was similar to the given settlement offer.

20. The method according to claim 19, which further comprises automatically updating the creditor behavior profile each time the creditor takes an action in response to a settlement offer.

21. The method according to claim 19, which further comprises basing the initial settlement offer, at least in part, upon the prediction from the creditor behavior profile.

22. The method according to claim 15, wherein the action of the creditor is one of:

an acceptance of the initial settlement offer;

a rejection of the initial settlement offer; and

a counter settlement offer to the initial settlement offer.

23. The method according to claim 22, which further comprises automatically generating and relaying to the creditor a new settlement offer if the creditor rejects the initial settlement offer.

24. The method according to claim 23, which further comprises:

storing a debtor profile in the at least one database, the debtor profile being comprised of information, entered into the portal by the debtor and stored in the at least one database, that reflects the financial condition of the debtor; and

utilizing the debtor profile to provide a range of possible settlement offers based at least in part on the information reflecting the financial condition of the debtor;

storing a creditor behavior profile in the at least one database, the creditor behavior profile being comprised of each past action taken by the creditor in response to a settlement offer;

utilizing the creditor behavior profile to predict what action the creditor will likely take on any given settlement offer based upon each past action taken by the creditor in response to a settlement offer that was similar to the given settlement offer;

generating the new settlement offer from the range of possible settlement offers; and

basing the new settlement offer, at least in part, upon the prediction from the creditor behavior profile.

25. The method according to claim 22, wherein, if the creditor counters the initial settlement offer, the debtor carries out one of:

accepting the creditor'"'"'s counter settlement offer;

rejecting the creditor'"'"'s counter settlement offer; and

countering the creditor'"'"'s counter settlement offer.

26. The method according to claim 25, which further comprises:

directly accessing the portal by the debtor using the user-interface to take a debtor'"'"'s action selected from one of accepting, rejecting, and countering the creditor'"'"'s counter settlement offer; and

storing the debtor'"'"'s action in the at least one database, the debtor'"'"'s action being directly visible to the creditor upon the creditor subsequent access of the portal.

27. The method according to claim 26, which further comprises:

storing a debtor profile in the at least one database, the debtor profile being comprised of information, entered into the portal by the debtor and stored in the at least one database, that reflects the financial condition of the debtor; and

utilizing the debtor profile to provide a range of possible settlement offers based at least in part on the information reflecting the financial condition of the debtor; and

one of accepting, rejecting, and countering the counter settlement offer of the creditor based, at least in part, on whether or not the counter settlement offer of the creditor is within the range of possible settlement offers.