Semantic computing system

• US 20110119285A1
• Filed: 11/16/2009
• Published: 05/19/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 11/16/2009
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Chen-Yu Sheu
• Original Assignee: Chen-Yu Sheu
• Inventors: Sheu, Chen-Yu
• Application Number:
  US12/590,827
• Publication Number:
  US 20110119285A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 707/760
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 40/30 Semantic analysis

Abstract

This invention is related to providing a semantic computing system (SCS) that allows user(s) of a computing system (a desktop computer, a cell phone, a server or a network of computers) to create, search, use and manipulate its resources (including personal and shared data resources such as files and database records, and personal and shared tool resources such as programs and devices) based on commands and annotations expressed in natural language.

Claims

1. A semantic computing system for a computing system, the semantic computing system comprising

a computer interface that can be connected to a user that allows the user to compose a command sentence in natural language;

a computer interface that can be connected to a user that allows the user to compose an annotation for a resource in natural language;

an annotation database that stores the annotations created;

a command processor that parses a command sentence, searches for the resources needed to execute the command, and activates one or more tools with the necessary arguments to execute the command.

2. The system of claim 1, further comprising a computer can be a personal desktop computer, a cell phone capable of performing computational tasks, a server shared by multiple users, or a set of computers connected by a network.

3. The system of claim 1, further comprising a module that requests the user to choose a resource if multiple resources are identified as candidates for the same role (data or tool) in a command.

4. The system of claim 1, further comprising that multiple annotations may be defined for a resource.

5. The system of claim 1, further comprising that a URL may be considered as a tool and/or data resource.

6. The system of claim 1, further comprising that each annotation for a data resource is expressed in the form of a noun phrase.

7. The system of claim 1, further comprising that each annotation for a tool resource is expressed in the form of an imperative sentence.

8. The system of claim 1, further comprising that a command is expressed in the form of an imperative sentence.

9. The system of claim 1, further comprising that a program is a tool resource.

10. The system of claim 1, further comprising that a data or document file is a data resource.

11. The system of claim 1, further comprising that a device that can be accessed by the computer system is a tool and/or data resource.

12. The system of claim 1, further comprising that any record or set of records of a database is a data resource.

13. The system of claim 1, further comprising a communication processor if the computing system is shared by multiple users and it allows users to communicate by sending/receiving messages to/from a mailbox that is created for each resource, each command sentence that has been posted, each user, and any group of the above that can be defined by the administrator;

in this case, a message, a user or a mailbox is also a data resource.

14. A computer-implemented method of problem solving in a semantic computing system, the method comprising:

prompting a user to compose an imperative command sentence;

matching the noun phrases in the command sentence with the annotations of the data resources available in the system to identify those data resources that may serve as an argument to a tool resource;

matching the command sentence with the annotation sentence(s) of the tool resources available in the system to identify tool resources whose annotation may match a part of or the entire command sentence;

determining a tool resource and one or more data resources whose annotations combined can match a noun phrase in the command sentence;

passing the identified one or more data resources as arguments to the identified tool resource for execution.

15. The method of claim 14, further comprising that a command sentence may be matched by combining more than one tool resources.

16. The method of claim 14, further comprising that a tool resource whose annotation that partially matches the command sentence is returned as a candidate.

17. The method of claim 14, further comprising that the user is prompted to choose a tool resource when multiple tool resources are identified as candidates.

18. The method of claim 14, further comprising that the user is prompted to choose a data resource when multiple data resources are identified as candidates as a parameter of a tool resource.

19. The method of claim 14, further comprising that if a data resource cannot be found to match a noun phrase of the command sentence, a new data resource is created with the noun phrase as its annotation and the data resource is used as an argument for the tool identified.

20. The method of claim 14, further comprising that if a login name and a password are required by the tool resource, the login name and password can be pre-stored in a database by the user so that they can be retrieved and passed to the tool resource automatically when the tool resource is activated by the command processor.

21. The method of claim 14, further comprising that if multiple tool resources whose annotations can match the command sentence, one may be pre-assigned to be the default tool resource to execute for the command sentence;

the assignment together with the command sentence are stored in a database so that next time when the same command sentence is posted the default tool resource can be automatically selected for activation.

22. The method of claim 14, further comprising that each annotation for a data resource is expressed in the form of a noun phrase.

23. The method of claim 14, further comprising that each annotation for a tool resource is expressed in the form of an imperative sentence.

24. The method of claim 14, further comprising that a command is expressed in the form of an imperative sentence.