LINK ANALYSIS COMPLIANCE AND CALIBRATION VERIFICATION FOR AUTOMATED PRINTED WIRING BOARD TEST SYSTEMS

• US 20110131030A1
• Filed: 12/20/2010
• Published: 06/02/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 09/14/2007
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Mayo Foundation For Medical Education And Research (Mayo Clinic)
• Original Assignee: Mayo Foundation For Medical Education And Research (Mayo Clinic)
• Inventors: McCoy, Bart O., Techentin, Robert W., Schraufnagel, Daniel, Daniel, Erik S.
• Granted Patent: US 8,446,165 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 703/14
• CPC Class Codes: G01R 31/2801 Testing of printed circuits, backplanes, motherboards, hybrid circuits or carriers for multichip packages [MCP] G01R31/318508 takes precedence; contactless testing G01R31/302; testing contacts or connections G01R31/66
• CPC Class Codes: G01R 31/2822 of microwave or radiofrequency circuits of attenuation, gain, e.g. using network analyzers G01R27/28
• CPC Class Codes: G01R 31/2837 Characterising or performance testing, e.g. of frequency response transient response G01R27/28

Abstract

A transmission line on a printed wiring board is tested and printed wiring board manufacturing variability is assessed. A response of the transmission line to a signal test pattern is measured. A network including a plurality of components connected by the transmission line is then simulated. The simulated network is based on the measured scattering parameters and virtual models representative of each of the components in the network. A system-level output response of the simulated network to a simulated input signal is analyzed, and the printed wiring board is characterized based on a comparison of the system-level output response to a printed wiring board performance metric threshold.

Claims

1. A method for testing a transmission line on a printed wiring board and assessing printed wiring board manufacturing variability, the method comprising:

measuring a response of the transmission line to an applied signal;

simulating a network including a plurality of components connected by the transmission line, wherein the simulated network is based on the measured response and models representative of each of the components in the network;

analyzing a system output response of the simulated network to a simulated input signal; and

characterizing the printed wiring board based on a comparison of the system output response to a printed wiring board performance metric threshold.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the measuring step comprises measuring a time domain transmission response of the transmission line.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the measuring step comprises measuring scattering parameters of the transmission line.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the analyzing step comprises:

generating an eye diagram based on the scattering parameters; and

measuring an inner envelope of the eye diagram.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the categorizing step comprises:

comparing the measured inner envelope of the eye diagram to the printed wiring board performance metric threshold.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the categorizing step comprises:

categorize the printed wiring board as passing or failing based on the system output response relative to the performance metric threshold.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the categorizing step comprises:

assigning the printed wiring board to a performance rating group based on a difference between the system output response and the performance metric threshold.

8. The method of claim 1, and further comprising:

calibrating the transmission line test; and

verifying the accuracy of the calibration.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the calibrating step comprises:

conducting a calibration test on a test substrate; and

generating calibration data from the calibration test.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the conducting step comprises:

randomizing probe placement on contact pads of the test substrate.

11. The method of claim 9, wherein the verifying step comprises:

generating a database of verification standards from scattering parameter measurements of one or more verification substrates;

calculating upper and lower limits of variability from the verification standards, wherein the upper and lower limits of variability define a calibration compliance range; and

comparing the calibration data to the calibration compliance range to determine whether the transmission line test is accurately calibrated.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein calculating upper and lower limits of variability from the verification standards comprises:

calculating upper and lower limits of variability for each scattering parameter.

13. The method of claim 11, wherein calculating upper and lower limits of variability from the verification standards comprises:

determining a variance parameter of the database of verification standards.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein determining the variance parameter of the database of verification standards comprises:

determining any of the average deviation, the standard deviation, the median absolute deviation, and the worst-case deviation of the database of verification standards.

15. The method of claim 11, and further comprising:

conducting a recalibration test on the test substrate if the calibration data is outside the calibration compliance range;

generating recalibration data from the recalibration test; and

comparing the recalibration data to the calibration compliance range to determine whether the transmission line test is accurately calibrated.

16. The method of claim 11, and further comprising:

regenerating the standards database from scattering parameter measurements of the one or more verification structures when one or more test system portions are repaired or replaced.

17. The method of claim 9, wherein, prior to conducting the calibration test, the method further comprises:

storing a progress point of a transmission line test.

18. The method of claim 17, and further comprising:

recalibrating the transmission line test if the calibration data is outside the calibration range; and

resuming the transmission line test at a progress point stored prior to a last calibration in which the calibration data was within the calibration compliance range.