Weight-Ordered Enumeration of Referents and Cutting Off Lengthy Enumerations

• US 20110131033A1
• Filed: 12/02/2009
• Published: 06/02/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 12/02/2009
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Clausal Computing Oy (Tatu Juhani Ylönen)
• Original Assignee: TATU Ylonen OY Limited
• Inventors: Ylonen, Tatu J.
• Application Number:
  US12/629,606
• Publication Number:
  US 20110131033A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 704/9
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 40/20 Natural language analysis semantic analysis of natural language G06F40/30

Abstract

In many reference resolution problems there are many candidate referents, and the overhead of enumerating them can be considerable. The overhead is reduced by stopping enumeration before all candidate referents have been enumerated, utilizing the properties of ordered and semi-ordered enumerators. Converting semi-ordered enumerators into ordered enumerators and combining several ordered enumerators into a single using dynamic weightings for handling determiner interpretations are disclosed.

Claims

1. A method comprising:

enumerating, by a computer, a first plurality of candidate referents for a referring expression in a natural language expression in semi-descending order of weight using a first enumeration source; and

cutting off, by the computer, the enumeration before all available candidates have been enumerated in response to set criteria for previously enumerated candidates having been met.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the semi-descending order is an order where there is a non-monotonically descending upper limit on the weight of any later enumerated candidates.

3. The method of claim 2, further comprising:

buffering a plurality of the enumerated candidates; and

releasing candidates from the buffer in non-monotonically descending order.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein at least one of the candidates is released from the buffer in response to its weight exceeding the upper limit before all candidates have been enumerated.

5. The method of claim 2, wherein the weight of a candidate indicates the upper limit of the weight of any further candidates that may be returned by the enumerator.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the upper limit is communicated separately from the candidate when enumerating.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the set criteria include that the weight of any further candidates cannot become within a threshold of the best already enumerated candidate.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the set criteria include that the desired number of candidates has already been enumerated, and the weight of any further candidates cannot become better than the weight of the worst candidate in the already enumerated candidates.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

enumerating, by the computer, a second plurality of weighted candidate referents for the same referring expression in semi-descending order of weight using a second enumeration source;

selecting a weight adjustment method for each of the sources;

adjusting the weight of the returned candidates according to the selected adjustment method for each source, wherein the adjustment method causes the weight of at least one candidate from at least one source to be modified; and

selecting the next returned candidate to be the best weighted candidate from either of the sources.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein each order is a non-monotonically descending order.

11. The method of claim 9, wherein the candidates from at least source are reordered into non-monotonically descending order after adjusting their weight.

12. The method of claim 9, wherein the adjustment method is multiplication by a constant.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein a determiner in the referring expression influences the selection of the sources to use and the selection of the adjustment method for each source.

14. The method of claim 9, wherein the selection of the adjustment method is influenced by the discourse context in which the referring expression occurs.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein the semi-descending order is a non-monotonically descending order.

16. The method of claim 1, further comprising filtering candidates based on constraints derived at least in part from the referring expression.

17. The method of claim 16, further comprising annotating the filtered candidates with information about how the constraints were used.

18. The method of claim 16, wherein the filtering is performed before computing the weight for a candidate.

19. The method of claim 16, further comprising filtering of the candidates, wherein at least one constraint used in the filtering is not absolute, and the weight of at least one filtered candidate is adjusted in response to a failure to match the constraint.

20. An apparatus comprising:

a natural language interface comprising a reference resolver;

a first semi-ordered enumerator coupled to the reference resolver; and

a cutoff logic coupled to the enumerator for terminating enumeration before all available candidates have been enumerated in response to set criteria for previously enumerated candidates having been met.

21. The apparatus of claim 20, wherein the enumerator is an ordered enumerator.

22. The apparatus of claim 20, further comprising a reordering buffer coupled between the semi-ordered enumerator and the cutoff logic.

23. The apparatus of claim 20, further comprising:

a second semi-ordered enumerator;

a first adjuster/buffer connected to the first semi-ordered enumerator;

a second adjuster/buffer connected to the second semi-ordered enumerator;

a weighting logic for selecting weight adjustment methods for the adjuster/buffers; and

a selector for selecting the candidate with the highest weight after weight adjustment.

24. The apparatus of claim 20, further comprising a filter embedded within the semi-ordered enumerator for determining whether each potential candidate matches constraints imposed on the referent.

25. The apparatus of claim 20, wherein the apparatus is a computer.

26. The apparatus of claim 20, wherein the apparatus is a robot.

27. The apparatus of claim 20, wherein the apparatus is a home appliance.

28. The apparatus of claim 20, wherein the apparatus is an office appliance.

29. A computer comprising:

a means for resolving references in a natural language expression;

a means, coupled to the means for resolving references, for enumerating candidates for a referring expression in a natural language expression in descending order of weight;

a means, coupled to the means for enumerating, for cutting off the enumeration before all available candidates have been enumerated in response to set criteria for previously enumerated candidates having been met.

30. The computer of claim 29, further comprising a means, coupled to the means for enumerating, for reordering candidates returned by the means for enumerating into non-monotonically descending order by their weight.

31. The computer of claim 29, further comprising:

a second means for enumerating candidates for the same referring expression in descending order of weight;

for each means for enumerating, a means coupled to the means for enumerating for adjusting the weight of enumerated candidates according to a relative weight associated with the respective means for enumerating;

a means, coupled to each of the means for adjusting, for selecting the candidate with the best weight after adjusting to be returned next.

32. A computer program product stored on a tangible computer-readable medium, operable to cause a computer to resolve references for a referring expression in a natural language expression, the product comprising:

a computer readable program code means for enumerating a first plurality of weighted candidate referents for the referring expression in semi-descending order; and

a computer readable program code means for cutting off the enumeration before all available candidates have been enumerated in response to set criteria for previously enumerated candidates having been met.

33. The computer program product of claim 32, wherein the semi-descending order is a non-monotonically descending order.

34. The computer program product of claim 32, further comprising:

a computer readable program code means for reordering candidates obtained from the means for enumerating into non-monotonically descending order by their weight.

35. The computer program product of claim 32, wherein the means for enumerating comprises a means for combining enumerators with dynamic weight adjusting.