FENCE INTRUSION DETECTION

• US 20110172954A1
• Filed: 04/20/2010
• Published: 07/14/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 04/20/2009
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: University of Southern California
• Original Assignee: University of Southern California
• Inventors: Yousefi, Ali, Dibazar, Alireza, Berger, Theodore W.
• Application Number:
  US12/763,974
• Publication Number:
  US 20110172954A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 702/150
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 13/122 for a perimeter fence features peculiar to electrified fences A01K3/00

Abstract

A compact, inexpensive, and reliable fence intrusion detection system may detect activity on a fence and determine the type of activity based on discrimination. The hardware may include a 3-axis accelerometer and a RISC microprocessor. The system may be equipped with a wireless device which enables the system to work remotely and communicate with a base station. An algorithm may detect activity vs. no-activity on the fence. The algorithm may thereafter recognize the type of the activity; such as whether it is due to rattling caused by strong wind or a breach such as a person climbing the fence. The recognition algorithm may be computationally inexpensive and therefore also may be embedded inside a local RISC microcontroller. The system has been tested on different fences and demonstrated an over 90% correct recognition rate.

Claims

1. A fence intrusion detection system comprising:

a sensor configured to generate one or more signals indicative of movement of the fence; and

a signal processing system configured to distinguish based on the signals;

between movement of the fence and substantially no movement of the fence; and

between movement of the fence caused by rattling of the fence and movement of the fence caused by climbing of the fence.

2. The fence intrusion of claim 1 wherein the signal processing system is configured to distinguish base on the one or more signals between movement of the fence cause by rattling of the fence, movement of the fence caused by climbing of the fence, and movement of the fence caused by activity other than rattling or climbing of the fence.

3. The fence intrusion system of claim 1 wherein the signal processing system is configured to distinguish based on the one or more signals between movement of the fence cause by rattling of the fence, movement of the fence caused by climbing of the fence, and movement of the fence caused by kicking of the fence.

4. The fence intrusion system of claim 3 wherein the signal processing system is configured to distinguish based the on one or more signals between movement of the fence cause by rattling of the fence, movement of the fence caused by climbing of the fence, movement of the fence caused by kicking of the fence, and movement of the fence caused by activity other than rattling, climbing, or kicking of the fence.

5. The fence intrusion system of claim 1 wherein the signal processing system is configured to distinguish based on the one or more signals between movement of the fence cause by rattling of the fence, movement of the fence caused by climbing of the fence, and movement of the fence caused by leaning on the fence.

6. The fence intrusion system of claim 3 wherein the signal processing system is configured to distinguish based the on one or more signals between movement of the fence cause by rattling of the fence, movement of the fence caused by climbing of the fence, movement of the fence caused by leaning on the fence, and movement of the fence caused by activity other than rattling, climbing, or leaning on the fence.

7. The fence intrusion system of claim 1 wherein the signal processing system is configured to distinguish based on the one or more signals between movement of the fence cause by rattling of the fence, movement of the fence caused by climbing of the fence, movement of the fence caused by leaning on the fence, and movement of the fence caused by kicking of the fence.

8. The fence intrusion system of claim 3 wherein the signal processing system is configured to distinguish based the on one or more signals between movement of the fence cause by rattling of the fence, movement of the fence caused by climbing of the fence, movement of the fence caused by leaning on the fence, movement of the fence caused by kicking of the fence, and movement of the fence caused by activity other than rattling, climbing, leaning, or kicking of the fence.

9. The fence intrusion system of claim 1 wherein the fence intrusion system includes a rechargeable power source and is configured to power down a substantial portion of the signal processing system when the one or more signals from the sensor indicate that there is substantially no movement of the fence.

10. The fence intrusion system of claim 1 wherein the one or more signals from the sensor are indicative of acceleration of the fence and the signal processing system is configured to distinguish between movement and substantially no movement of the fence by comparing the magnitude of the acceleration with a threshold.

11. The fence intrusion system of claim 10 wherein threshold is dynamic and the fence intrusion system is configured to adjust the threshold.

12. The fence intrusion system of claim 11 wherein the fence intrusion system is configured to adjust the threshold based on long term changes in the magnitude of the acceleration.

13. The fence intrusion system of claim 1 wherein the signal processing system is configured to distinguish between movement and substantially no movement of the fence based on a time analysis of the one or more signals.

14. The fence intrusion system of claim 1 wherein the signal processing system:

includes a Gausian mixture model configured to detect movement of the fence from the one or more signals;

includes a Gausian mixture model configured to detect substantially no movement of the fence from the one or more signals; and

is configured to distinguish between movement and substantially no movement of the fence based on which of the Gausian mixture models provides a higher output.

15. The fence intrusion system of claim 1 wherein the signal processing system:

includes a Gausian mixture model configured to detect movement of the fence cause by rattling of the fence from the one or more signals;

includes a Gausian mixture model configured to detect movement of the fence cause by climbing of the fence from the one or more signals; and

is configured to distinguish between movement of the fence caused by rattling of the fence and by climbing of the fence based on which of the Gausian mixture models provides a higher output.

16. The fence intrusion system of claim 1 wherein the signal processing system:

includes a Gausian mixture model configured to detect movement of the fence cause by rattling of the fence from the one or more signals;

includes a Gausian mixture model configured to detect movement of the fence cause by climbing of the fence from the one or more signals;

includes a Gausian mixture model configured to detect movement of the fence cause by activity other than rattling or climbing or of the fence from the one or more signals; and

is configured to distinguish between movement of the fence caused by rattling of the fence, by climbing of the fence, and by activity other than rattling or climbing of the fence based on which of the Gausian mixture models provides a higher output.

17. The fence intrusion system of claim 1 wherein:

the sensor is configured to sense movement in three orthogonal directions X, Y, &

Z; and

the signal processing system is configured to distinguish between movement of the fence caused by rattling of the fence and by climbing of the fence based on the following feature vector;

F=(S_v,E_X/z,E_Y/Z,E_F1|X,E_F2|X,E_F1|Y,E_F2|Y,E_F1|Z,E_F2|Z)

18. A fence intrusion detection system comprising:

a sensor configured to generate one or more signals indicative of movement of the fence;

a signal processing system configured to distinguish based on the signals between different types of activity which cause movement of the fence; and

a wireless transmission system configured to wirelessly transmit information about the different types of activity which is distinguished by the processing system;

a rechargeable power source; and

wherein the intrusion detection system is configured to power down a substantial portion of the signal processing system when the one or more signals from the sensor indicate that there is substantially no movement of the fence.

19. A fence intrusion detection system comprising:

a sensor configured to generate one or more signals indicative of movement of the fence; and

a signal processing system configured to distinguish based on the signals between movement of the fence caused by rattling of the fence and movement of the fence caused by climbing of the fence.

20. A fence intrusion detection system comprising:

a sensor configured to generate one or more signals indicative of movement of the fence;

a compartment housing the sensor; and

at least one fastener configured to attach the compartment to a wire in the fence, the fastener having a slot which is wider than the diameter of the wire in the fence.

21. The fence intrusion detection system of claim 20 comprising a plurality of fasteners, each configured to attach the compartment to a wire in the fence, and each having a slot running fastener which is wider than the diameter of the wire in the fence.

22. The fence intrusion detection system of claim 21 wherein each of the fasteners are configured such that the angular orientation of their slot may rotate with respect to the compartment so as to enable the compartment to be attached to fences having wires which create different mesh patterns.

23. The fence intrusion detection system of claim 21 wherein the compartment is configured with at least one slot in which at least one fastener is positioned, thus enabling the longitudinal separation distance between at least two of the fasteners to be adjusted so as to enable the compartment to be attached to fences having wires with different spacings between them.