BUILDING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WITH FAULT ANALYSIS

• US 20110178977A1
• Filed: 03/31/2011
• Published: 07/21/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 06/22/2009
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Johnson Controls Technology Company (Johnson Controls International plc)
• Original Assignee: Johnson Controls Technology Company (Johnson Controls International plc)
• Inventors: Drees, Kirk H.
• Granted Patent: US 9,753,455 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 706/52
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 15/02 electric
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 2219/2642 Domotique, domestic, home control, automation, smart house
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 23/0229 knowledge based, e.g. expert systems; genetic algorithms
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/04 Forecasting or optimisation specially adapted for administrative or management purposes, e.g. linear programming or "cutting stock problem" market predictions or forecasting for commercial activities G06Q30/0202
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: H02J 13/00001 characterised by the display of information or by user interaction, e.g. supervisory control and data acquisition systems [SCADA] or graphical user interfaces [GUI]
• CPC Class Codes: H02J 13/00002 characterised by monitoring
• CPC Class Codes: H02J 13/00004 characterised by the power network being locally controlled
• CPC Class Codes: H02J 13/00016 using a wired telecommunication network or a data transmission bus
• CPC Class Codes: H02J 2203/20 Simulating, e g planning, reliability check, modelling or computer assisted design [CAD]
• CPC Class Codes: H02J 2310/16 The load or loads being an Information and Communication Technology [ICT] facility
• CPC Class Codes: Y02B 70/30 Systems integrating technologies related to power network operation and communication or information technologies for improving the carbon footprint of the management of residential or tertiary loads, i.e. smart grids as climate change mitigation technology in the buildings sector, including also the last stages of power distribution and the control, monitoring or operating management systems at local level
• CPC Class Codes: Y02B 90/20 Smart grids as enabling technology in buildings sector smart grids supporting the management or operation of end-user stationary applications in general, or like technologies with no associated climate change mitigation effect Y04S20/00
• CPC Class Codes: Y02E 60/00 Enabling technologies; Technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
• CPC Class Codes: Y02P 90/84 Greenhouse gas [GHG] management systems
• CPC Class Codes: Y02P 90/845 Inventory and reporting systems for greenhouse gases [GHG]
• CPC Class Codes: Y04S 20/00 Management or operation of end-user stationary applications or the last stages of power distribution; Controlling, monitoring or operating thereof
• CPC Class Codes: Y04S 20/20 End-user application control systems
• CPC Class Codes: Y04S 40/124 using wired telecommunication networks or data transmission busses
• CPC Class Codes: Y04S 40/20 Information technology specific aspects, e.g. CAD, simulation, modelling, system security

Abstract

A controller for a building management system is configured to analyze faults in the building management system. The controller detects a fault in the building management system by evaluating data of building management system using a system of rules. The controller determines a conditional probability for each of a plurality of possible fault causes given the detected fault. The controller determines the most likely fault cause by comparing the determined probabilities and electronically reports the most likely fault cause.

Claims

1. A computerized method for analyzing faults in a building management system, the method comprising:

at a computer of the building management system, detecting a fault by evaluating data of the building management system using a system of rules;

determining a conditional probability for each of a plurality of possible fault causes of the detected fault;

determining a most likely fault cause by comparing the determined probabilities; and

electronically reporting the most likely fault cause.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the conditional probability for each of the plurality of possible fault causes of the detected fault comprises:

accounting for a marginal probability of the occurrence of the fault and a marginal probability of the occurrence of the possible fault cause.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein determining the conditional probability for each of the plurality of possible fault causes of the detected fault comprises:

updating prior and marginal probabilities associated with the fault and one or more possible fault causes; and

applying Bayes'"'"' theorem to at least one of the possible fault causes of the detected fault and the updated prior and marginal probabilities.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein updating the prior and marginal probabilities comprises receiving feedback from a user input module regarding the accuracy of prior electronic reporting of most likely fault causes.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein determining a conditional probability for each of the plurality of possible fault causes given the detected fault comprises:

determining whether two or more faults having one or more overlapping causes have been detected; and

updating a conditional probability for the one or more overlapping causes.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein determining a conditional probability for each of a plurality of possible fault causes of the detected fault comprises:

recalling the conditional probability of the detected fault and for each possible fault cause from memory.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein electronically reporting the most likely fault cause comprises at least one of:

(a) causing an indication of the most likely fault cause to be displayed on an electronic display in communication with the computer;

(b) causing an indication of the most likely fault cause to be transmitted to another device or remote source; and

(c) adding the most likely fault cause to a report for the detected fault.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein evaluating data of the building management system using a system of rules comprises comparing current information of the building management system to historical information of the building management system.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

causing expanding data logging of the building management system.

10. The method of claim 9, further comprising:

using data obtained by the expanded data logging to update at least one of prior and marginal probabilities associated with the fault and/or one or more possible fault causes;

applying Bayes'"'"' theorem to at least one of the possible fault causes given the detected fault and the updated prior probabilities or marginal probabilities.

11. A method for analyzing faults in a building management system, comprising:

at a supervisory controller of the building management system, detecting a fault by evaluating data of one or more remote devices in the building management system;

in response to detecting the fault and by the supervisory controller, acquiring and storing new data from the building management system; and

analyzing the detected fault using the new data.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the new data comprises variables that are not normally received and stored by the supervisory controller.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the acquisition and storage of the new data occurs without human intervention.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein analyzing the detected fault comprises conducting one or more calculations to estimate a source for the fault.

15. The method of claim 11, wherein acquiring the new data comprises sending a request to the one or more remote devices of the building management system for the new data.

16. The method of claim 11, wherein acquiring the new data comprises receiving and storing a data point normally broadcast by one or more devices of the building management system but not normally acquired or stored by the supervisory controller.

17. The method of claim 11, wherein acquiring the new data comprises sending a command to the one or more remote devices of the building management system.

18. The method of claim 11, wherein the remote device that generated the data used in detection of the fault is a different remote device than that which generates the new data for acquisition and storing.

19. A supervisory controller for a building management system, comprising:

a communications interface; and

a processing circuit configured to receive data from one or more remote devices in the building management system via the communications interface;

wherein the processing circuit is configured to detect a fault by evaluating the received data; and

wherein the processing circuit is configured to acquire and store new data from the building management system in response to detecting the fault.

20. Computer-readable media with computer-executable instructions embodied thereon that when executed by a computer system perform a method for analyzing faults in a building management system, wherein the instructions comprise:

instructions for detecting a fault by evaluating data of the building management system using a system of rules;

instructions for determining a conditional probability for each of a plurality of possible fault causes given the detected fault;

instructions for determining a most likely fault cause by comparing the determined probabilities; and

instructions for electronically reporting the most likely fault cause.