METHOD AND DEVICE FOR ANALYZING AN EXECUTION OF A PREDETERMINED PROGRAM FLOW ON A PHYSICAL COMPUTER SYSTEM

• US 20110184716A1
• Filed: 07/21/2009
• Published: 07/28/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 09/05/2008
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Siemens Healthineers AG (Siemens AG)
• Original Assignee: Siemens AG
• Inventors: Rölle, Harald, Mangold, Florian
• Granted Patent: US 9,507,690 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 703/22
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3612 by runtime analysis performance monitoring G06F11/3466

Abstract

The functionality of simulated, virtual hardware units is varied during the execution of a program flow on the virtual hardware units, for example via an interface device of a simulation device, in such a manner that the execution behavior changes of a program flow can be identified by using at least one faulty, physical hardware unit. A method and a device are used for analyzing an execution of a predetermined program flow on a physical computer system. The method and the device are used to determine execution behavior changes of software products which changes are due to faulty hardware components. The method and device allow execution behavior changes to be identified systematically, using an operating system and eliminates the need for expensive, physical hardware components and for modifications to a physical computer system.

Claims

1. A method for analyzing an execution of a predetermined program flow on a physical computer system which has a plurality of interacting physical hardware units, comprising the following steps:

replicating a functionality of a physical hardware unit as functionality of a virtual hardware unit in order to develop at least part of a virtual computer system which corresponds to the physical computer system;

executing the program flow a first time using the replicated functionality of the virtual hardware unit, and monitoring a first execution behavior of the program flow;

executing the program flow a second time using a varied functionality of the virtual hardware unit, and monitoring a second execution behavior of the program flow; and

comparing the first execution behavior with the second execution behavior in order to identify an execution behavior change.

2. The method according to claim 1,

wherein a further step is performed:

varying the functionality of the virtual hardware unit.

3. The method according to claim 1,

wherein the program flow is changed in order to counterbalance the identified execution behavior change.

4. The method according to claim 1,

wherein the functionality of the physical hardware unit is changed in order to counterbalance the identified execution behavior change when executing the program flow using the physical hardware unit.

5. The method according to claim 1,

wherein at least one of the program flow and the functionality of the physical hardware unit is changed such that the first execution behavior and the second execution behavior are identical.

6. The method according to claim 1,

wherein an execution behavior is described by a temporal sequence of parameter assignments which are initiated by the execution of the program flow.

7. The method according to claim 1,

wherein an execution behavior is described by a temporal sequence of execution states in individual execution steps of the predetermined program flow, wherein a respective execution state is not-terminated, terminated or cancelled, wherein the execution state is not-terminated during the execution of the program flow, is terminated after execution of the program flow, and is cancelled in the case of an unpredictable cancellation of the execution of the program flow.

8. The method according to claim 1,

wherein an execution behavior is described by a temporal sequence of performance indicators relating to the execution of individual execution steps of the predetermined program flow.

9. The method according to claim 1,

wherein at least one of the replication of the functionality of the physical hardware unit, the first execution of the program flow and monitoring of the execution behavior, the second execution of the program flow and monitoring of the execution behavior, and the comparison of the monitored execution behaviors can be executed at least to some extent in parallel relative to time.

10. The method according to claim 1,

wherein the replication of the functionality of the physical hardware unit comprises virtualization.

11. The method according to claim 1,

wherein the replication of the functionality of the physical hardware unit comprises emulation.

12. The method according to claim 1,

wherein the varying of the functionality of the virtual hardware unit is done by means of an interface entity (310) of the virtual computer system (301).

13. The method according to claim 1,

wherein the replication of the functionality of the physical hardware unit involves enhancing a hypervisor to include an interface entity for varying the functionality of the virtual hardware unit.

14. The method according to claim 1,

wherein the varying of a functionality of a first virtual hardware unit takes place depending on a functionality of a second virtual hardware unit.

15. The method according to claim 1,

wherein the monitoring of the execution behavior of the predetermined program flow comprises at least one of capturing, measuring, estimating, logging, and storing at least one of parameter assignments, execution states and performance indicators.

16. The method according to claim 1,

wherein the predetermined program flow comprises at least one of a test routine, algorithm, software program, instruction sequence and/or program routine.

17. A computer installation for analyzing an execution of a predetermined program flow using a physical hardware unit which interacts with at least one further physical hardware unit as a physical computer system, comprising a control entity operable to replicate the functionality of the physical hardware unit as a functionality of a virtual hardware unit, to vary a functionality of the virtual hardware unit, to monitoring an execution behavior, and to compare the execution behaviors.

18. The computer installation according to claim 17, wherein the control entity is suitable for counterbalancing an execution behavior change which was identified by comparing the execution behaviors.

19. The computer installation according to claim 17,

wherein the control entity comprises at least one of:

at least one replicating entity for replicating the functionality of the physical hardware unit, at least one execution entity for executing the predetermined program flow using the functionality of the virtual hardware unit, at least one variation entity for varying the functionality of the virtual hardware unit during the program flow, at least one monitoring entity for monitoring the execution behavior, at least one comparison entity for comparing the execution behaviors and at least one counterbalancing entity for counterbalancing the execution behavior change.

20. The computer installation according to claim 17,

wherein the computer installation is further configured

to replicate a functionality of a physical hardware unit as functionality of a virtual hardware unit in order to develop at least part of a virtual computer system which corresponds to the physical computer system;

to execute the program flow a first time using the replicated functionality of the virtual hardware unit, and monitoring a first execution behavior of the program flow;

to execute the program flow a second time using a varied functionality of the virtual hardware unit, and monitoring a second execution behavior of the program flow; and

to compare the first execution behavior with the second execution behavior in order to identify an execution behavior change.

21. The computer installation according to claim 17,

wherein the replicating entity or the control entity is embodied as a hypervisor in which an interface entity is provided for varying the functionality of the virtual hardware unit.

22. The computer installation according to claim 21,

wherein the variation entity varies the functionality of the virtual hardware unit via the interface entity during the execution of the program flow.

23. The computer installation (1) according to claim 17,

wherein the replicating entity, the execution entity, the variation entity, the monitoring entity and the comparison entity are implemented at least partially as a computer program.

24. A computer program product comprising a computer-readable medium storing instructions, which when executed on a computer installation for analyzing an execution of a predetermined program flow using a physical hardware unit which interacts with at least one further physical hardware unit as a physical computer system, the computer installation comprising a control entity operable to replicate the functionality of the physical hardware unit as a functionality of a virtual hardware unit, to vary a functionality of the virtual hardware unit, to monitor an execution behavior, and to compare the execution behaviors, perform the steps of:

replicating a functionality of a physical hardware unit as functionality of a virtual hardware unit in order to develop at least part of a virtual computer system which corresponds to the physical computer system;

executing a program flow a first time using the replicated functionality of the virtual hardware unit, and monitoring a first execution behavior of the program flow;

executing the program flow a second time using a varied functionality of the virtual hardware unit, and monitoring a second execution behavior of the program flow; and

comparing the first execution behavior with the second execution behavior in order to identify an execution behavior change.