System and Method of Controlling In-Bound Path Selection Based on Historical and Continuous Path Quality Monitoring, Assessment and Predictions

• US 20110194421A1
• Filed: 04/20/2011
• Published: 08/11/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 07/30/2008
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Avaya Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Avaya Incorporated
• Inventors: Rodrig, Benjamin
• Granted Patent: US 8,848,543 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 370/248
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 41/147 for predicting network behaviour
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 41/149 for prediction of maintenance
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 43/0829 Packet loss
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 43/0852 Delays
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 43/0864 Round trip delays
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 43/087 Jitter
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 45/70 Routing based on monitoring results
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 40/12 based on transmission quality or channel quality
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 40/18 based on predicted events

Abstract

A system and method of automatically controlling in-bound traffic from a first communications peer to a second communications peer based on an input from a historical path quality assessment and prediction system is disclosed. The second communications peer receives an input from the historical path quality assessment and prediction system, selects a path through a relay based on the received input, requests allocation of the relay, and sends an address of the selected relay to the first communications peer. The system and method works in concert with an Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) mechanism, or takes advantage of the features of the Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) mechanism.

Claims

1-19. -19. (canceled)

20. A method of automatically controlling traffic between a first communications peer and a second communications peer, the method comprising:

separately performing path quality assessments for one or more portions of a path;

concatenating the path quality assessments, wherein the path quality assessments include one or more quality metrics that are indicated in an Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) mechanism; and

making a path selection decision based on the concatenated path quality assessments.

21. The method according to claim 20, further comprising:

selecting an Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) candidate pair based on the path selection decision.

22. The method according to claim 20, wherein path quality assessments are performed by one of the second communications peer or a system interacting with the second communications peer for a portion of the path between the second communications peer and a relay, and

wherein path quality assessments are performed by one of the first communications peer or a system interacting with the first communications peer for a portion of the path between the first communications peer and the relay.

23. The method according to claim 20, wherein the indication in the Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) mechanism is in an ICE candidate priority field.

24. The method according to claim 20, further comprising:

sending, by the second communications peer to the first communications peer, one of an update or a re-invite including a transport address associated with the path selection decision.

25-29. -29. (canceled)

31. A system for automatically controlling traffic between communications peers, the system comprising:

a first communications peer;

a first historical path quality assessment and prediction system that performs path quality assessments for a first portion of one or more paths;

a second communications peer; and

a second historical path quality assessment and prediction system that performs path quality assessments for a second portion of the one or more paths,

wherein the second communications peer concatenates the path quality assessments,

wherein the path quality assessments include one or more quality metrics that are indicated in an Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) mechanism, and

wherein the second communications peer makes a path selection decision based on the concatenated path quality assessments.

32. The system according to claim 31, wherein the second historical path quality assessment and prediction system performs the path quality assessments for a portion of the path between the second communications peer and the relay, and

wherein the first historical path quality assessment and prediction system performs the path quality assessments for a portion of the path between the first communications peer and the relay.