Traffic density based safety shutoff mechanism for compression or converging traffic management system

• US 20110248868A1
• Filed: 04/08/2010
• Published: 10/13/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 04/08/2010
• Status: Active Application

• Current Assignee: James Jacob Free
• Original Assignee: James Jacob Free
• Inventors: Free, James Jacob
• Application Number:
  US12/798,613
• Publication Number:
  US 20110248868A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 340/907
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 1/0104 Measuring and analyzing of parameters relative to traffic conditions
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 1/07 Controlling traffic signals

Abstract

During any kind of traffic management involving consolidation or compression, or converging readouts or outputs, shortening of individual vehicle headway, there is a necessity that vehicles in a moving pattern must get closer together. For the particular case of taking random traffic approaching a traffic signal and consolidating traffic to go through the signal during the green phase, vehicles must be substantially consolidated at a ratio of the service cycle of the traffic signal to the “net” green during which time they all pass through the signal. This remains true for both autonomic as well as adjustable adaptable phase-changing traffic management systems. Traffic density (passing vehicle number per time) is measured before or at the beginning of traffic management. Density figures are compared under a predetermined scheduling/convergence mechanism that takes into account the densest traffic will be, or the closest vehicles will be with respect to one another. If the pre-compressed, pre-converging density is found to be lean or sparse enough for traffic management to function, outputs are allowed to continue and traffic management is allowed to remain open. If the pre-compressed, pre-converging density is found to be too dense, that is, if the densest place or duration in traffic management is too close for a safe headway or reaction time, than traffic management/outputs are suspended.

Claims

1. A safety shutoff device for a traffic management system that comprises of:

a counter that counts density of traffic flow including passing vehicles per time,

a processor that analyzes whether the count is lean/sparse enough, or too dense to allow traffic management system to function.

2. the device of claim 1 wherein traffic might converge/be brought closer together in time and space or with reducing individual vehicle headway due to management.

3. The device of claim 2 wherein processor might take into account the closeness in space and time, for example as a headway, following distance, reaction time, and analyze for the closest that said following distance might be,

and process and allow for that closeness when said traffic was far apart and including when said far apart traffic was a random pattern approaching said place where traffic management occurs.

4. A device of claim 3 that includes means of sensing vehicles approaching an area that is traffic managed,

Said device including means for detecting and counting individual vehicles per time in one or more lanes of a roadway in one or more directions, primarily where moving zones or patterns are ultimately to be filled with traffic, wherein heightened mobility is in use,

wherein said heightened mobility zones are associated with a traffic signal,

wherein said traffic management includes compressing, condensing, converging a previously random string of traffic into a net green pattern length and time period such that said pattern is intended to go through intersection of said traffic signal while said signal is open or green,

wherein said previously random strings of traffic are divided up in lengths and time periods of the service cycle of said traffic signal

wherein said traffic management system is conducive to counting individual vehicles per time and switching on or off, depending on whether net density is safe enough,

a means of ascertaining as to whether there are too many vehicles counted per time for said vehicles to have a net safe following distance as they are in their final run, or most dense part of run, while going through traffic management,

wherein there is a Boolean condition, or “

go/no go”

condition choice that dictates whether it is either safe, or not safe for traffic management,

wherein place or slot in said previous random pattern associated with following distance, space time, reaction time at beginning of where traffic is managed is determined by the product of a standardized safety following factor and the ratio of the service cycle of the intersection and the net green,

wherein said net green is space time that total service cycle Pi space time in previous before-management random string was compressed, converged, or condensed to,

and wherein the density of said space time during net green Tng is either too dense or lean enough to still maintain vehicles, all with adequate headway, reaction time, relative safe following distance,

wherein said standardized headway/safety following factor is a standardized safe following space time wherein said space time can be taken as the time that accumulates between the instant when a leading vehicle passes a relative static reference point by roadside, and the instant a following vehicle passes the same reference point, wherein that time can also be interpreted as a relative distance between the two moving vehicles,

wherein service cycle is a repeating cycle of signaled intersection,

wherein the net green is the time intended for the managed traffic to go through while signal is open, and containing the necessary buffers, secondary buffers that may add to said net green wherein said buffers would account for late arrivals, early arrivals, wayward traffic, absorption of specially assigned vehicles . . . ,

wherein there may be more mobility involved as a result of traffic management, but more importantly, more safety in prevention of traffic management causing too dense of traffic to result because of too close of headways or following distances or reaction times.

5. The device of claim 4 wherein the equation that describes the safe following headway in terms of time is:

6. The system of claim 4 wherein safety limit is established at an initial contact headway “

space-time”

expansion wherein there is an expanded time measured, counted, processed such that after any consolidation, compression (per time), convergence, traffic management, that final safety following “

space-time”

or established headway would be no smaller than a net safety following “

space-time”

or established headway wherein said “

space-time”

or established headway will create what is equal to or greater than a commonly agreed upon setting of safe relative following distance/“

space time”

or established headway,

wherein said “

lean enough traffic”

is defined where a set number of places or slots, each where its space-time/headway is still ok for motorist to have an adequate reaction time.

7. The system of claim 4 wherein said process of analyzing whether or not traffic is too dense or lean enough works under a feeding in condition.

8. The device of claim 7 wherein open random traffic developing into “

aggregate”

time considerations and open random traffic developing into “

aggregate”

pattern-length considerations apply to moving developing patterns relative to a static access point, and to relative positions of moving vehicles;

moving traffic,

Including the possibility of shutting traffic management systems/functions off or on, making decisions part-way into traffic management patterns or part way out of said patterns (including within patterns and multiple times),

wherein fragments of patterns could still be OK to turn on or off traffic management systems,

wherein portions of patterns, i.e. Pi and Tng can still remain operational,

wherein there can be more mobility,

wherein there can be allowance for continuity in traffic management,

and wherein too much traffic density in a phase fragment can be avoided as could happen if shut-off had to start early allowing for the rear portion of a phase to still be open and provide for more mobility,

and wherein the danger of too much traffic density in a phase fragment can be avoided as could happen if shut-off had to wait till end of phase providing for more safety.

wherein system processor can wait for partial Pi through multiple Pi before turning back on

9. The system of claim 7 wherein said analysis can be applied on a differential basis,

wherein said differential increments can range in the smaller magnitudes (higher frequency) from many thousands of increments per second, or many increments per second,

wherein other extreme of said range can include increments that are large enough to include combination of vehicle and following distance, headway, reaction time, space time, and confidence factor,

wherein said combination could be amount to a multiple number of whole seconds.

10. The system of claim 4 wherein said system can be installed in an integrated condition.

11. The system of claim 4 including option for manual, automatic inputs,

wherein said manual and/or automatic inputs can range from being partial or totally in control of said system,

12. The system of claim 4 wherein while the traffic management system is functioning, that readouts take place, and while system is in “

shut down”

or “

no go”

mode that an appropriate message corresponding to “

shut down”

or “

no go”

perceivable by motorist still remains.

13. The system of claim 10 wherein said message is appropriately integrated with readout methodology,

wherein said easily perceived offline output can include a “

FP”

-type readout (i.e. “

Full Pattern”

) for alphanumeric readouts;

a “

Drive Safely”

-type sentence for message board type readouts;

an appropriate graphical semaphore for non-sentence, non alphanumeric readouts.

wherein easily perceived output can include audio messages

14. The “

go/no go system of “

safe or not safe”

in claim 4 wherein “

go/no go”

is established by whether a set number of places per net green Tng is exceeded or not,

wherein said set number can also include closest rounded off number of places wherein traffic management can happen,

wherein said place can be any combination of vehicle plus appropriate following distance, reaction time, space time, and confidence factor,

wherein said places are detected within a Pi where they are spread out substantially the most that they will be (i.e. in random approach substantially before detection/counting/traffic managing).

15. The system of claim 4 that acts with dynamically changing and/or adapting traffic management systems (i.e. sensor based) wherein said set number of places (in claim 14) can change along with the adaptability of the traffic management system.

16. The system of claim 15 wherein there is a shrinking and or expanding “

net green”

Tng, and therefore number of place changes

wherein said Pi is constant while said Tng changes.

17. The system of claim 15 wherein there is a shrinking or expanding Service Cycle Pi, and including number of place changes in an also-changing Tng.

18. The system of claim 15 where the safety shutoff adaptively changes in “

jumps”

or increments,

wherein there is a range between numerous (i.e. multiple seconds per time, or many times a second) calculations or analytical scans and a multitude (i.e. many or more thousands of times per second) of analytical scans,

wherein said scans individually determine whether the dynamic change is going in one direction or the other

wherein the frequency of scans could range between “

independent analyses” and

a constant “

vision”

of the direction the dynamic change is going in,

wherein the increments either add to/subtract from a buffer, or if past a certain limit/delineation, add or subtract a whole “

place”

(as from claims 14, 15),

and wherein if need be, said delineation would be required to surpass the necessary extra safety time buffers (to prevent loss of continuity by too rapidly changing back and fourth),

wherein the increasing or decreasing places can apply to expanding contracting Pi,

wherein the increasing or decreasing places can apply to expanding contracting Tng, including through unified phase increases or decreases, or opposing direction tradeoff increase/decreases.

19. The system of claim 10 wherein there is an option for parasitic installation i.e. wherein safety hardware can be mounted in with already existing hardware in a piggyback or parasite condition, and wherein safety hardware can be worked in with already existing infrastructure,

20. The system of claim 11 wherein said manual inputs can include for example, manual intervention, manual shut-down, prompting, preempting, prompting, preempting aboard emergency vehicles, prompting or preempting from remote locations (i.e. control consoles),

wherein examples of automatic inputs include, time of day shutoff, bad conditions shutoff, scheduled shutoff, emergency vehicle shutoff, automatic proximity, i.e. lights, sound, emergency automatic on-board rf/radio frequency, school bus proximity shutoff, prompting, preempting, delay shutoff,

wherein with said delay shutoff, system can wait for periods ranging from partial Pi through multiple Pi before turning back on,

wherein said manual and automatic inputs can make system perform more safely.