METHOD OF OPTIMISING ENERGY CONSUMPTION

• US 20110251726A1
• Filed: 05/03/2007
• Published: 10/13/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 05/03/2006
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Light-Based Technologies Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Light-Based Technologies Incorporated
• Inventors: McNulty, Nicholas, Vanderstockt, Yann Daniel Edgard, Packham, Ian, Byrne, Martin, Hagras, Hani
• Application Number:
  US12/299,155
• Publication Number:
  US 20110251726A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 700/278
• CPC Class Codes: F24F 11/30 for purposes related to the operation of the system, e.g. for safety or monitoring
• CPC Class Codes: F24F 11/46 Improving electric energy efficiency or saving
• CPC Class Codes: F24F 11/58 using Internet communication
• CPC Class Codes: F24F 11/62 characterised by the type of control or by internal processing, e.g. using fuzzy logic, adaptive control or estimation of values
• CPC Class Codes: F24F 2130/00 Control inputs relating to environmental factors not covered by group F24F2110/00
• CPC Class Codes: F24F 2130/10 Weather information or forecasts
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 13/0265 the criterion being a learning criterion
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 13/0285 using neural networks and fuzzy logic

Abstract

This invention relates to a method and controller (1) for optimising energy consumption in a building. More specifically, the present invention describes a method and controller (1) for use in a building having a building management system (BMS) (3). Typically, the BMS (3) has sensors distributed throughout the building to determine the environmental conditions in the building and the BMS controls a heating/cooling system of the building.

Claims

1. A method of optimising energy consumption in a building having a building management system (BMS), the BMS being used to monitor the environmental conditions of the building and control the heating system of the building, the method comprising the steps of:

gathering the building environmental conditions data;

gathering weather data relevant to the building;

applying a plurality of intelligent control techniques to the building environmental conditions data and the weather data;

calculating a proposed BMS control input for each intelligent control technique;

determining the accuracy of the proposed BMS control input for each of the intelligent control techniques and thereafter determining an appropriate control input for the BMS; and

providing the appropriate control input to the BMS for subsequent implementation by the BMS.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1 in which the step of applying the plurality of intelligent control techniques to the building environmental conditions data and the weather data comprises applying two or more of neural network techniques, genetic algorithm techniques and fuzzy logic techniques.

3. The method as claimed in claim 1 in which the step of determining the accuracy of the intelligent control techniques further comprises the steps of:

comparing the building environmental conditions data and weather data with historical data stored in a database;

determining the historical data that most closely matches the building environmental conditions data and, weather data; and

thereafter determining the accuracy of the intelligent control techniques based on the accuracy of the intelligent control techniques historically.

4. The method as claimed in claim 1 in which the step of determining the appropriate control input for the BMS comprises using the intelligent control technique that is determined to be the most accurate for those conditions.

5. The method as claimed in claim 1 in which the step of determining the appropriate control input for the BMS comprises generating a control input from a weighted average of a plurality of the intelligent control techniques with the weighting based on their historical accuracy.

6. The method as claimed in claim 1 in which the step of determining the accuracy of the intelligent control techniques further comprises minimisation of the error of each of the intelligent control techniques.

7. The method as claimed in claim 1 in which the step of providing the appropriate control input to the BMS further comprises providing one or more of an optimal start time, an optimal stop time and a setpoint control.

8. The method as claimed in claim 1 in which the BMS data and weather data are received over a network interface.

10. The method as claimed in claim 1 in which the intelligent control techniques are arranged in a cascaded manner.

11. The method as claimed in claim 1 in which the weather data comprises predicted weather data.

12. The method as claimed in claim 1 in which the weather data comprises current weather data.

13. The method as claimed in claim 1 in which the intelligent control techniques use recursive processing to determine control inputs to the BMS.

14. The method as claimed in claim 1 in which the step of determining an appropriate control input for the BMS from the intelligent control techniques further comprises using an adaptive decider.

15. The method as claimed in claim 14 in which the adaptive decider ranks each of the intelligent control techniques periodically and takes the highest ranked intelligent control technique.

16. The method as claimed in claim 14 in which the adaptive decider ranks each of the intelligent control techniques periodically and provides a weighted average of a plurality of the intelligent control techniques.

17. The method as claimed in claim 15 in which the adaptive decider ranks the intelligent control techniques based on historical accuracy data.

18. The method as claimed in claim 15 in which the adaptive decider ranks the intelligent control techniques daily.

19. The method as claimed in claim 15 in which the method comprises the steps of storing the rankings in a database.

20. The method as claimed in claim 14 in which the adaptive decider uses one or more variables including external weather conditions, heating and cooling requirements of the building, and optimal selection of the most appropriate algorithms for these variables.

21. The method as claimed in claim 14 in which the intelligent control techniques are grouped together by type.

22. The method as claimed in claim 1 in which an intelligent control technique algorithm that is deemed to have low output accuracy is disabled.

23. The method as claimed in claim 1 in which an intelligent control technique algorithm that is deemed to have low output accuracy is re-trained.

24. The method as claimed in claim 1 in which the method comprises the step of using a hybrid genetic algorithm and neural network approach to predict one of an optimal start time, an optimal stop time and a setpoint temperature.

25. The method as claimed in claim 1 in which the method comprises the step of using a hybrid fuzzy logic controller and neural network approach to predict one of an optimal start time, an optimal stop time and a setpoint temperature.

26. The method as claimed in claim 1 in which the method comprises the step of implementing data-mining techniques using a hybrid fuzzy logic and genetic algorithm approach to determine a plurality of variables for a plurality of optimisers.

27. The method as claimed in claim 1 in which the method comprises the step of using a neural network approach implementing predictive recursive techniques to determine one of an optimal start time and an optimal stop time.

28. The method as claimed in claim 27 in which the neural network approach implementing predictive recursive techniques is carried out repeatedly with the desired output a time interval less than thirty minutes in the future each time the technique is carried out.

42. A computer readable medium having stored thereon a computer program having program instructions to cause a computer to carry out the method of claim 1.

9. The method as claimed in claimed 8 in which one of the BMS data and the weather data are received over the internet.

29. A controller for optimising energy consumption in a building having a heating system monitored and controlled by a building management system (BMS), the controller comprising:

a BMS interface for receiving building environmental conditions data and a weather interface for receiving weather data relating to the building in which the controlled heating system operates;

a database for storing the building environmental conditions data and weather data therein;

a core processor having a plurality of intelligent control technique units, each of the intelligent control techniques units having means to receive building environmental conditions data and weather data and calculate a proposed BMS control input;

the core processor further comprising means to determine the accuracy of each of the intelligent control technique units and means to determine an appropriate control input for the BMS; and

the controller having means to transmit the appropriate control input to the BMS.

30. The controller as claimed in claim 29 in which the plurality of intelligent control technique units comprise two or more of a fuzzy logic unit, a genetic algorithm unit and a neural network unit.

31. The controller as claimed in claim 29 in which the means to determine the accuracy of each of the intelligent control techniques units comprises means to compare the current set of inputs with historical inputs stored in the database and determine which of the intelligent control technique units was most accurate historically.

32. The controller as claimed in claim 29 in which the core processors means to determine an appropriate control input for the BMS further comprises an adaptive decider.

33. The controller as claimed in claim 32 in which the adaptive decider has means to determine the most accurate proposed BMS control input received from the intelligent control technique units and use that control input as the appropriate control input for the BMS.

34. The controller as claimed in claim 32 in which the adaptive decider has means to determine the accuracy of each of the proposed BMS control inputs received from the intelligent control technique units and generate an appropriate control input for the BMS based on a weighted average of the proposed control inputs of the BMS.

35. The controller as claimed in claim 34 in which the core processor has a data pre-processing unit to rank each of the intelligent control technique units periodically thereby providing a weighting value to that intelligent control technique unit.

36. The controller as claimed in claim 32 in which the core processor is provided with a plurality of adaptive deciders arranged in cascading format.

37. The controller as claimed in claim 36 in which an output of one of the adaptive deciders is fed as an input to another of the adaptive deciders.

38. The controller as claimed in claim 29 in which the controller forms part of a BMS.

39. The controller as claimed in claim 29 in which the controller has access to a flexible zone map of the building.

40. The controller as claimed in claim 29 in which the controller has a sensor validation module 27.

41. The controller as claimed in claim 29 in which the controller receives data from a plurality of wireless sensors distributed throughout the building.