METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AUTOMATIC STOP AND START OF VEHICLE

• US 20110257862A1
• Filed: 11/16/2010
• Published: 10/20/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 04/14/2010
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Hyundai Motor Company (Hyundai Motor Group), Kia Motors Corporation (Kia Corp.)
• Original Assignee: Hyundai Motor Company (Hyundai Motor Group), Kia Motors Corporation (Kia Corp.)
• Inventors: Cho, Suk Hwan, Lee, Chan Kyu, Lee, Si Hyoung, Lim, Eun Muk, Um, Dae Youn
• Application Number:
  US12/947,353
• Publication Number:
  US 20110257862A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 701/96
• CPC Class Codes: B60T 2201/022 Collision avoidance systems
• CPC Class Codes: B60T 7/22 initiated by contact of vehicle, e.g. bumper, with an external object, e.g. another vehicle , or by means of contactless obstacle detectors mounted on the vehicle
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2554/801 Lateral distance
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2554/804 Relative longitudinal speed
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 30/17 with provision for special action when the preceding vehicle comes to a halt, e.g. stop and go

Abstract

Disclosed is a control method for use in a system for controlling a distance between vehicles. The method comprises a) controlling, in response to the leading vehicle'"'"'s deceleration, deceleration of the control vehicle; b) controlling stop speed of the control vehicle so that the control vehicle approaches the leading vehicle at a constant speed without stopping; c) controlling the control vehicle to stop smoothly exactly at a position spaced from the leading vehicle by a predetermined stop distance; and d) controlling the start of the control vehicle after determining whether the leading vehicle has started or moved forward.

Claims

1. A method for optimally controlling a distance between a control vehicle and a leading vehicle running ahead of the control vehicle in a system for controlling a distance between vehicles that enables automatic stop and start, the method comprising the steps of:

a) controlling, in response to the leading vehicle'"'"'s deceleration, deceleration of the control vehicle by considering a relative acceleration, a relative speed and a relative distance of the control vehicle with respect to the leading vehicle;

b) controlling stop speed of the control vehicle so that the control vehicle approaches the leading vehicle at a constant speed without stopping;

c) controlling the control vehicle to stop smoothly exactly at a position spaced from the leading vehicle by a predetermined stop distance; and

d) controlling the start of the control vehicle after determining whether the leading vehicle has started or moved forward.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the step b) comprises:

b-1) determining whether the speed of the leading vehicle is lower than a predetermined low running speed;

b-2) returning to the step a) if it is determined that the speed of the leading vehicle is not lower than the predetermined low running speed; and

b-3) setting the leading vehicle speed to the predetermined low running speed if it is determined that the speed of the leading vehicle is lower than the predetermined low running speed.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the step b) further comprises a step of stop prevention control in which in case where the leading vehicle stops and the control vehicle is going to stop at a position farther than a request stop distance of the control vehicle, a value of a relative distance with respect to a relative speed of the control vehicle is adjusted so that the control vehicle moves, without stopping, to a position that meets the request stop distance.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the step of stop prevention control comprises:

determining whether the relative distance is longer than the request stop and whether the control vehicle is stopped, in case where the control vehicle is going to stop at a position farther than the request stop distance;

adjusting the value of the relative distance with respect to the relative speed of the control vehicle, if it is determined that the relative distance is longer than the request stop and the control vehicle is stopped; and

performing the step c), if it is determined that the relative distance is not longer than the request stop or the control vehicle is not stopped.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the step c) comprises:

c-1) determining whether predetermined stop conditions of the control vehicle are satisfied;

c-2) returning to the step b), if it is determined that the predetermined stop conditions are not satisfied;

c-3) changing control gains of an acceleration, a speed and a distance, respectively, if it is determined that the predetermined stop conditions are satisfied;

c-4) changing a request deceleration on the basis of the changed control gains; and

c-5) stopping stably the control vehicle according to the changed request deceleration.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the step c-1) comprises:

determining whether the predetermined stop conditions are satisfied by determining whether the leading vehicle remains stopped, whether the speed of the control vehicle is lower than the stop speed, and whether the relative distance is lower than the request stop distance;

concluding that stop conditions of the control vehicle are satisfied if it is determined that the predetermined stop conditions are satisfied; and

concluding that stop conditions of the control vehicle are not satisfied if it is determined that the predetermined stop conditions are not satisfied.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the step d) comprises:

d-1) determining whether the relative distance is longer than the length of the control area where the step d) is expected to be performed or whether the speed of the leading vehicle is higher than a predetermined speed of the leading vehicle;

d-2) controlling the control vehicle to remain stopped, if it is determined that the relative distance is not longer than the length of the start control area and the speed of the leading vehicle is not higher than the predetermined speed of the leading vehicle; and

d-3) controlling the control vehicle to start, if it is determined that the relative distance is longer than the length of the start control area or the speed of the leading vehicle is higher than the predetermined speed of the leading vehicle.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the range of the start control area is determined by tuning, the range needs to satisfy at least a value of request stop distance +α

, which means that the range of the start control area is required to be larger than the request stop distance, and the amount of +α

is determined by tuning and a driving environment.

9. The method of claim 7, wherein, a dead zone for the distance error is set in the start control area so that the control vehicle may not respond to a little movement of the leading vehicle the request acceleration according to a small distance error may be limited.