MOBILE IMAGE QUALITY ASSURANCE IN MOBILE DOCUMENT IMAGE PROCESSING APPLICATIONS

• US 20110280450A1
• Filed: 05/12/2010
• Published: 11/17/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 05/12/2010
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Mitek Systems Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Mitek Systems Incorporated
• Inventors: Nepomniachtchi, Grigori, DeBello, James
• Granted Patent: US 8,582,862 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 382/112
• CPC Class Codes: G06V 10/24 Aligning, centring, orientation detection or correction of the image
• CPC Class Codes: G06V 10/993 Evaluation of the quality of the acquired pattern

Abstract

Techniques for assuring the quality of mobile document image captured using a mobile device are provided. These techniques include performing one or more tests to assess the quality of images of documents captured using the mobile device. The tests can be selected based on the type of document that was imaged, the type of mobile application for which the image quality of the mobile image is being assessed, and/or other parameters such as the type of mobile device and/or the characteristics of the camera of the mobile device that was used to capture the image. The image quality assurance techniques can also be implemented on can be implemented on a mobile device and/or on a remote server where the mobile device routes the mobile image to the remote server processing and the test results are be passed from the remote server to the mobile device.

Claims

1. A mobile document image quality assurance system for assessing the quality of mobile document images captured by a mobile device, the system comprising:

a preprocessing module configured to

receive a mobile document image captured using a camera of a mobile device and processing parameters for configuring the system for testing the mobile document image;

extract a document subimage from the mobile document image; and

select one or more mobile image quality assurance tests to be performed on the mobile image based at least in part on the processing parameters;

a test execution module configured to

execute the one or more mobile image quality assurance tests on the document subimage to assess the quality of the mobile image; and

reject the mobile document image if the image fails at least one mobile image quality test.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein the test execution module is configured to reject the mobile document image only if the mobile image fails at least one mobile image quality assurance test that is flagged as critical.

3. The system of claim 2, wherein the test execution module is configured to flag the mobile document image for review if the mobile image fails at least one test but the mobile image has not failed any critical tests.

4. The system of claim 1, wherein the test execution module is further configured to:

provide detailed test result messages for each of the one or more mobile image quality assurance tests that the mobile image fails, the detailed test result messages providing guidance to a user of the mobile device for correcting one or more factors having a negative impact on image quality in order to retake the mobile image without the negative impact of the one or more factors.

5. The system of claim 4, wherein the detailed test result messages are provided to the mobile device for display to the user.

6. The system of claim 1 wherein the mobile image quality assurance tests are configurable, and wherein the preprocessing module selects a set of test parameters to configure the mobile image quality assurance tests.

7. The system of claim 6, wherein the mobile image quality assurance tests are configurable based on the processing parameters received by the preprocessing module.

8. The system of claim 7, wherein the processing parameters include information identifying a type of mobile device used to capture the mobile document image and wherein the preprocessing module is configured to select a set of test parameters for each mobile image quality assurance tests that optimize the tests for the type of mobile device.

9. The system of claim 7, wherein the processing parameters include information identifying a type of mobile application requesting quality assurance testing of the mobile image, and wherein the preprocessing module is configured to select a set of test parameters for the mobile image quality assurance tests that optimize the tests for the type of mobile application.

10. The system of claim 7, wherein the preprocessing module is configured to select a set of test parameters that include thresholds used to determine whether the document subimage fails a mobile image quality assessment test.

11. The system of claim 6, wherein the mobile image quality assurance tests are configurable to eliminate repeated rejection of mobile document images of the same document.

12. The system of claim 1, wherein the mobile document image quality assurance system is implemented on the mobile device.

13. The system of claim 1, wherein the mobile document image quality assurance system is implemented on a remote server.

14. The system of claim 1, wherein the mobile document image is comprises an image of a financial document.

15. The system of claim 1, wherein the mobile document image comprises an image of a check.

16. The system of claim 1, wherein the mobile document image comprises an image of a business card.

17. The system of claim 1, wherein the mobile document image comprises an image of a receipt.

18. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more mobile image quality assurance tests includes an image focus test to determine whether the document subimage is in focus.

19. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more mobile image quality assurance tests includes a shadow test that determines whether the quality of the document subimage is affected by one or more shadows.

20. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more mobile image quality assurance tests includes a contrast test that determines whether the quality of the contrast of the document subimage is high enough for processing.

21. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more mobile image quality assurance tests includes a planar skew test that determines whether the document subimage is skewed within the mobile document image.

22. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more mobile image quality assurance tests includes a view skew test that determines whether the quality of the document subimage is impacted by perspective skewing.

23. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more mobile image quality assurance tests includes a cut corner test that determines whether one or more of corners of a document in the document subimage have been cut off.

24. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more mobile image quality assurance tests includes a cut side test that determines whether one or more of sides of a document in the document subimage have been cut off.

25. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more mobile image quality assurance tests includes a cut side test that determines whether one or more of sides of a document in the document subimage have been cut off.

26. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more mobile image quality assurance tests includes a warped image test that determines whether the document subimage is warped.

27. The system of claim 1, wherein the document subimage is of a check, and wherein the one or more mobile image quality assurance tests includes a MICR-line test that determines whether the document subimage includes an MICR-line.

28. The system of claim 1, wherein the document subimage is identified as a back side of a check, and wherein the one or more mobile image quality assurance tests includes a front-as-back test that determines whether the document subimage is an image of a front side of the check rather than an image of the back side of the check.

29. A computer-implemented method for assessing the quality of mobile document images captured by a mobile device, the method comprising:

receiving a mobile document image captured using a camera of a mobile device and processing parameters for configuring the system for testing the mobile document image;

extracting a document subimage from the mobile document image, the document subimage;

selecting one or more mobile image quality assurance tests to be performed on the mobile image based at least in part on the processing parameters;

executing the one or more mobile image quality assurance tests on the document subimage to assess the quality of the mobile image; and

rejecting the mobile document image if the image fails at least one mobile image quality test.

30. The method of claim 29, wherein rejecting the mobile document image if the image fails at least one mobile image quality test further comprises:

rejecting the mobile document image only if the mobile image fails at least one mobile image quality assurance test is flagged as critical.

31. The method of claim 30, further comprising:

flagging the mobile document image for review if the mobile image fails at least one test but the mobile image has not failed any critical tests.

32. The method of claim 30, further comprising:

providing a detailed test result messages for each of the one or more mobile image quality assurance tests that the mobile image fails, the detailed test result messages providing guidance to a user of the mobile device for correcting one or more factors having a negative impact on image quality in order to retake the mobile image without the negative impact of the one or more factors.

33. The method of claim 32, wherein the detailed test result messages are provided to the mobile device for display to the user.

34. The method of claim 29 wherein the mobile image quality assurance tests are configurable, and the method further comprising:

selecting a set of test parameters to configure the mobile image quality assurance tests.

35. The method of claim 29, wherein the mobile image quality assurance tests are configurable based on the processing parameters.

36. The method of claim 29, wherein the processing parameters include information identifying a type of mobile device used to capture the mobile document image, the method further comprising:

selecting a set of test parameters for each mobile image quality assurance tests that optimize the tests for the type of mobile device.

37. The system of claim 29, wherein the processing parameters include information identifying a type of mobile application requesting quality assurance testing of the mobile image, the method further comprising:

selecting a set of test parameters for the mobile image quality assurance tests that optimize the tests for the type of mobile application.

38. The method of claim 29, further comprising:

selecting a set of test parameters for each mobile image quality assurance tests wherein the set of test parameters include thresholds used to determine whether the document subimage fails a mobile image quality assessment test.

39. The method of claim 29, wherein the mobile image quality assurance tests are configurable to eliminate repeated rejection of mobile document images of the same document.

40. The method of claim 29, wherein the mobile document image quality assurance system is implemented on a remote server.

41. The method of claim 29, wherein the mobile document image is comprises an image of a financial document.

42. The method of claim 29, wherein the mobile document image comprises an image of a check.

43. The method of claim 29, wherein the mobile document image comprises an image of a business card.

44. The method of claim 29, wherein the mobile document image comprises an image of a receipt.

45. The method of claim 29, wherein the mobile document image comprises an image of a receipt.

46. The method of claim 29, wherein the one or more mobile image quality assurance tests includes an image focus test to determine whether the document subimage is in focus.

47. The method of claim 29, wherein the one or more mobile image quality assurance tests includes a shadow test that determines whether the quality of the document subimage is affected by one or more shadows.

48. The method of claim 29, wherein the one or more mobile image quality assurance tests includes a contrast test that determines whether the quality of the contrast of the document subimage is high enough for processing.

49. The method of claim 29, wherein the one or more mobile image quality assurance tests includes a planar skew test that determines whether the document subimage is skewed within the mobile document image.

50. The method of claim 29, wherein the one or more mobile image quality assurance tests includes a view skew test that determines whether the quality of the document subimage is impacted by perspective skewing.

51. The method of claim 29, wherein the one or more mobile image quality assurance tests includes a cut corner test that determines whether one or more of corners of a document in the document subimage have been cut off.

52. The method of claim 29, wherein the one or more mobile image quality assurance tests includes a cut side test that determines whether one or more of sides of a document in the document subimage have been cut off.

53. The system of claim 29, wherein the one or more mobile image quality assurance tests includes a cut side test that determines whether one or more of sides of a document in the document subimage have been cut off.

54. The system of claim 29, wherein the one or more mobile image quality assurance tests includes a warped image test that determines whether the document subimage is warped.

55. The system of claim 29, wherein the document subimage is of a check, and wherein the one or more mobile image quality assurance tests includes a MICR-line test that determines whether the document subimage includes an MICR-line.

56. The system of claim 29, wherein the document subimage is identified as a back side of a check, and wherein the one or more mobile image quality assurance tests includes a front-as-back test that determines whether the document subimage is an image of a front side of the check rather than an image of the back side of the check.