Counting machine for discrete items

• US 20110282488A1
• Filed: 05/13/2010
• Published: 11/17/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 05/13/2010
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Data Detection Technologies Ltd.
• Original Assignee: Data Distribution Technologies LLC (General Patent Corporation)
• Inventors: Horev, Noam, Weinberger, Zvi
• Granted Patent: US 8,417,375 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 700/232
• CPC Class Codes: G06M 7/00 Counting of objects carried by a conveyor

Abstract

A method for dispensing a set number of items as a batch comprising the steps of: setting the set number of items in a batch; calibrating by forwarding items along a conveyor for a time interval; counting the number of items to fall off end of feeder in that time interval; calculating throughput per unit time; setting the conveyor to operate for a discrete time period calculated to approach but not exceed that required so that the running total reaches nut does not exceed the set number without otherwise adjusting conveyor settings; counting the number of items dispensed in the discrete time period; adding the number of items to fall off feeder in the discrete time period to running total, and repeating steps until the running total is greater or equal to the batch size wherein each iteration uses the number of particles per unit time in the preceding time period as basis for determining item through rate for calculating subsequent time period for operating the conveyor.

Claims

1. A method for dispensing a set number of items as a batch comprising the steps of:

(a) setting the set number of items in a batch;

(b) calibrating by

(b1) forwarding items along a conveyor for a time interval;

(b2) counting the number of items to fall off end of feeder in that time interval;

(b3) calculating throughput per unit time

(c) setting the conveyor to operate for a discrete time period calculated to approach but not exceed that required so that the running total reaches nut does not exceed the set number without otherwise adjusting conveyor settings;

(d) counting the number of items dispensed in the discrete time period of step c;

(e) adding the number of items to fall off feeder in the discrete time period of step c to running total, and

(f) repeating steps c, d and e until running total is greater or equal to the batch size

wherein each iteration uses the number of particles per unit time in the preceding time period as basis for determining item through rate for calculating subsequent time period for operating the conveyor.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the objects are counted using an apparatus for optically counting discrete objects, comprising:

a) a substantially vertical feeding channel having an upper end for receiving the objects;

b) first and second substantially collimated light sources arranged substantially orthogonally, substantially horizontally, and adjacent said feeding channel;

c) first and second photo-electric sensor arrays arranged substantially orthogonally, substantially horizontally, and adjacent said feeding channel such that light from said first light source is detected by said first sensor array and light from said second light source is detected by said second sensor array, each of said sensor arrays having an output;

d) processing means coupled to said outputs of said first and second sensor arrays for separately processing said outputs; and

e) numeric display means coupled to said processing means for displaying a total count of the objects, wherein the objects which enter said feeding channel pass between said light sources and said sensor arrays to cast shadows on said sensor arrays,

said processing means detects said shadows on said sensor arrays by separately processing said outputs of said sensor arrays, determines separate counts of how many objects have cast shadows on each of said sensor arrays, consistently chooses the larger or smaller of said separate counts, and increments the numeric display by the amount of the chosen larger or smaller count.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the particles are counting whilst falling, using an optical system comprising at least one light source incident on an individual pixilated array.

4. The method of claim 3 comprising two light source-array pairs arranged non-perpendicularly.

5. The method of claim 3 comprising three light source-array pairs arranged non-perpendicularly.

6. The method of claim 3 comprising three light source-array pairs wherein at least two light source-array pairs are arranged non-perpendicularly.

7. The method of claim 3 wherein said at least one light source is non-collimated.

8. The method of claim 3 wherein said at least two light sources are non-collimated.

9. The method of claim 3 wherein said at least three light sources are non-collimated.

10. The method of claim 3 wherein comparison of output of the pixilated arrays enables accurate determination of number of falling particles, individual resolution of separate particles falling together, and, shape of particles.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein where acceptable particles are approximately identical in size and shape, rejected particles are clearly identified and their numbers in the sample is determinable.

12. The method of claim 10 wherein images of rejected particles from pixilated arrays are stored in a memory for subsequent analysis.