CRITICALITY OF DATA

• US 20110295560A1
• Filed: 12/02/2009
• Published: 12/01/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 12/03/2008
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Mclaren Applied Technologies Limited (Mclaren Group Limited)
• Original Assignee: Trysome Limited
• Inventors: Crockford, Christopher
• Application Number:
  US13/132,739
• Publication Number:
  US 20110295560A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 702/187
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 20/30 relating to physical therapies or activities, e.g. physiotherapy, acupressure or exercising
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 40/67 for remote operation

Abstract

One use of datalogger'"'"'s is for gathering physiological conditional data about a person. A person can carry a datalogger and any associated sensors whilst they are in motion. The data recorded by the datalogger can then be uploaded to a third party system for analysis. Datalogger'"'"'s that record physiological information have a variety of uses. For example, they can be used for medical purposes to monitor a patient'"'"'s response to a course of treatment, or to monitor background factors about a person'"'"'s lifestyle that may allow a doctor to advise on healthy living, and for sports purposes, to monitor an athlete'"'"'s performance.

Energy consumption is a significant issue in the design of datalogger'"'"'s. It is desirable for a datalogger to be small and light, with a self-contained energy source such as a battery, but also to operate for as long as possible. This document describes means to prolong the life of the battery attached to both sensory devices and datalogger'"'"'s alike. Also detailed are scalable bandwidth mechanisms to present the time series data in a manner such that the system may maintain a level of control, which may be predetermined and controlled by the system administrator, of brief or verbose data transfer dependant upon the functionality required. A level of sensory device category criticality is also included in to the system such that graceful degradation of the system might be achieved whilst supporting a level of criticality of the data prescribed by the system designer.

Claims

1-28. -28. (canceled)

29. A data logging system comprising a datalogger and a plurality of sensor devices, the datalogger comprising a configurable memory storing a plurality of priorities, each associated with a respective one of the sensor devices, the datalogger being configured to cause data from the sensor devices to be processed in accordance with the stored priorities such that the transmission of data to the datalogger from a sensor device associated with a relatively high priority is prioritised over the transmission of data to the datalogger from a sensor device associated with a lower priority.

30. A data logging system as claimed in claim 29, wherein the datalogger is configured to store sensed data received from the sensor devices in accordance with the stored priorities such that the storage of data from a sensor device associated with a relatively high priority is prioritised over the storage of data from a sensor device associated with a lower priority.

31. A data logging system as claimed in claim 29, wherein the datalogger is configured to compress and/or encrypt sensed data received from the sensor devices in accordance with the stored priorities such that the compression and/or encryption of data from a sensor device associated with a relatively high priority is prioritised over the compression of data from a sensor device associated with a lower priority.

32. A data logging system as claimed in claim 29, wherein the system comprises a server remote from the datalogger, and the datalogger is configured to transmit to the server data received from the sensor devices in accordance with the stored priorities such that the transmission to the server of data from a sensor device associated with a relatively high priority is prioritised over the transmission to the server of data from a sensor device associated with a lower priority.

33. A data logging system as claimed in claim 29, wherein the sensor devices are capable of sampling data and buffering sampled data and the datalogger is configured for adaptively and/or dynamically controlling the manner in which each of the sensor devices samples and/or buffers data in dependence on the priority associated with the respective sensor device.

34. A data logging system as claimed in claim 29, wherein the datalogger comprises one or more wireless communication interfaces for communicating over one or more wireless channels with the sensor devices and the datalogger is configured for dynamically allocating bandwidth of the wireless channel(s) for use by each sensor device so as to favour the delivery to the datalogger of data from a sensor device associated with a relatively high priority.

35. A data logging system as claimed in claim 33, wherein the datalogger is configured to allocate the bandwidth of the wireless channel(s) such that the amount of (B-nl) live near real time data is proportioned against the data transfer of (B-pl) post real-time data, such that a continued delivery of data is achieved, and a fully populated time record of the data is available at the end of the process, but not to the detriment of timely critical data.

36. A data logging system as claimed in claim 29, wherein the datalogger comprises one or more wireless communication interfaces for communicating over one or more wireless channels with the sensor devices and the datalogger is configured for dynamically allocating bandwidth of the wireless channel(s) for use by each sensor device so as to inhibit the sensor devices from transmitting sensed data to the datalogger faster than the datalogger can process the sensed data.

37. A data logging system as claimed in claim 29, wherein the system comprises a server remote from the datalogger, and the datalogger is configured to transmit data to the server in accordance with a power-management strategy in accordance with which the datalogger stores a maximum EIRP (Pmax) and is configured to reduce the power level of its transmissions to the server from this PMax level by a pre-set amount upon receipt from the server of a data transfer acknowledgement packet;

and alternatively to increase the power level of its transmissions if no data acknowledgement packet is received within a pre-set time.

38. A system as claimed in claim 29, wherein the datalogger comprises one or more wireless communication interfaces for communicating over one or more wireless channels with the sensor devices and the datalogger is configured for allocating bandwidth of the wireless channel(s) for use by each sensor device so as to effectively manage the bandwidth allocated to each sensor device.

39. A data logging system as claimed in claim 29 wherein the datalogger comprises two or more wireless communication interfaces for communicating over two or more wireless channels with the sensor devices and the datalogger is configured to manage the usage of those channels by the sensor devices by one or more of associative bandwidth sharing, isolation, soloing and effective communications management.

40. A data logging system as claimed in claim 38, wherein the datalogger is configured to manage the bandwidth usage by the sensor device by means of a strategy that restricts interference due to communications by the sensor devices with the efficient operation of one or both of the data processing stack of the datalogger and the session layer of each wireless communication interface.

41. A data logging system as claimed in claim 29, wherein the system comprises a server remote from the datalogger, and the datalogger comprises one or more wireless communication interfaces for communicating over one or more wireless channels with the server, and the datalogger is configured to control the delivery of data from the datalogger to the server by means of the plurality of wireless communication interfaces in accordance with a pre-defined prioritisation so as to favour communication with the server over the highest prioritised interface that is currently capable of effective communication with the server.

42. A data logging system as claimed in claim 40, wherein the stored priorities can be changed dynamically such that the server can control the criticality and sampling rate of the sensor devices, based on a threshold of specific incoming data being reached.

43. A data logging system as claimed in claim 29, wherein the datalogger is capable of storing for each sensor device a data set comprising a definition of a device-specific identifier for that sensor device, a priority for that sensor device, an expected sampling rate (Ts) for that sensor device, a buffer rate (Tb) for that sensor device, a wireless or wired protocol specification for communication between the datalogger and that device, and wherein the datalogger is configured to control the transmission of sensed data from each sensor device to the datalogger in accordance with the data set stored for that sensor device.

44. A data logging system as claimed in claim 29, wherein the system comprises a server remote from the datalogger, and wherein the server is configured to allocate bandwidth over a channel between the server and the datalogger so as to allocate bandwidth for the timely download of new firmware to the datalogger.

45. A data logging system as claimed in claim 29, wherein the system comprises a plurality of dataloggers and a server remote from the dataloggers, the server being configured to analyse data received from the dataloggers and analyse the received data in accordance with a pre-defined set of rules.

46. A data logging system as claimed in claim 29, wherein the system comprises a server remote from the datalogger, the server being configured to transmit data to the datalogger to configure one or more of the sampling rate (Ts), buffer rate (Tb) or priority (Cf) of one or more of the sensor devices associated with that datalogger.

47. A data logging system as claimed in claim 29, wherein the datalogger stores a set of pre-defined rules and the datalogger is configured to analyse received data from one or more of the sensor devices in accordance with the rules.

48. A data logging system as claimed in claim 47, wherein the datalogger is configured to manage one or more of the sampling rate (Ts), buffer rate (Tb) or priority (CO of one or more of the sensor device in accordance with the rules.

49. A data logging system as claimed in claim 29, wherein the datalogger is configured to transmit a report to a remote recipient in response to the installation of new firmware on the datalogger.

50. A data logging system as claimed in claim 29, wherein the datalogger is configured to transmit a report to a remote recipient in response to the configuration by the server of one or more of the sampling rate (Ts), buffer rate (Tb) or priority (CO of one or more of the sensor devices associated with that datalogger.

51. A data logging system as claimed in claim 29, wherein the system comprises a server remote from the datalogger, and the datalogger is configurable by the server for communication with an additional sensor device by the receipt from the server of data defining one or more of the type, supported communication protocol(s), priority (Cf), sample rate (Ts) and buffer rate (Tb) of the sensor device.

52. A data logging system as claimed in claim 29, wherein the system comprises a server remote from the datalogger, the datalogger implements a graphical user interface and the datalogger is configurable by the server for re-configuration of the graphical user interface.

53. A data logging system as claimed in claim 52, wherein the re-configuration of the graphical user interface is responsive to a server-side push, or a client-side pull if a pre-defined rule dependent on data received from one or more the plurality of sensor devices is excepted.

54. A data logging system as claimed in claim 29, wherein the system comprises a server remote from the datalogger, and the datalogger is capable of storing a diary of events, the events being programmable by the server, and the datalogger being capable of presenting messages to alert a user to an event.

55. A data logging system as claimed in claim 54, wherein the datalogger is capable of monitoring the user'"'"'s compliance with the diary of events and is configured to transmit to the server data indicating the user'"'"'s compliance to the server.