Custom-shape wireless dog fence system and method

• US 20110298615A1
• Filed: 05/18/2011
• Published: 12/08/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 05/18/2010
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Radio Systems Corporation
• Original Assignee: Radio Systems Corporation
• Inventors: Rich, Christopher T., Lubic, Marko, Patterson, Wade, Conrad, Steve, Gurley, Jason S., Phillips, Terry G., White, John J. Jr., Kamery, Christopher
• Granted Patent: US 8,779,925 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 340/539.13
• CPC Class Codes: A01K 15/023 Anti-evasion devices
• CPC Class Codes: A01K 27/001 Collars
• CPC Class Codes: A01K 27/009 with electric-shock, sound, magnetic- or radio-waves emitting devices
• CPC Class Codes: A01K 29/005 Monitoring or measuring activity, e.g. detecting heat or mating
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 21/0261 System arrangements wherein the object is to detect trespassing over a fixed physical boundary, e.g. the end of a garden
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 21/0269 System arrangements wherein the object is to detect the exact location of child or item using a navigation satellite system, e.g. GPS
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 21/18 Status alarms G08B21/02 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 4/022 with dynamic range variability

Abstract

A custom-shaped wireless fence system is provided that contains one or more dogs in a user-defined containment area without the need for a physical fence or underground wire. The system, which is easy to set up and use, includes at least three base units and at least one collar and, preferably, a remote controller. A virtual fence is defined around the containment area, as well as around optional exclusion zones within the containment area, during system set up through communication between the base units and a trackable device as the user walks around the desired border. Visualization software enables the user to verify that the location of the fence is as desired and that the system is operating properly using a computing device having a display screen. In use, the system employs improved filtering of consecutive distance measurement values taken between the base units and the collar to discount errant measurement values in terms of their contribution to the current calculation of the dog'"'"'s location. These filtering techniques, in combination with improved signal strength and antenna diversity in the communication between the base units and the collar, improve the accuracy and consistency with which the dog'"'"'s location within a containment area is tracked so that unwanted corrections are not administered to the dog.

Claims

1. A wireless fence system for containing one or more dogs in a user-defined roaming area comprising:

a master base unit including a transceiver unit and at least two slave base units each having a transceiver unit, said master base unit and said slave base units being positioned in spaced relationship to one another within a generally central location;

a master base unit activating mechanism for activating the master base unit during a system topology set-up stage to initiate a communication sequence between the master base unit and the slave base units during which respective distances and spatial relationships between the master base unit and the slave base units are determined and placed on a predefined planar coordinate system in which said distances and spatial relationships are identified by respective coordinates within said planar coordinate system to define an overall base unit topology;

at least one collar worn by a dog, said collar including a transceiver unit in signal communication with the transceiver units of said master base unit and said slave base units, each of said base units being configured to continuously obtain distance values between itself and the collar on a real time basis using said transceiver units and to communicate said distance values to the master base unit for calculation of a tracking location value indicating a location of the dog within the planar coordinate system using a trilateration process;

a trackable device configured to communicate with the master base unit and the slave base units during a fence set-up stage during which said base units track consecutive positions of the trackable device as the trackable device is moved around a user-defined perimeter surrounding the generally central location, said user-defined perimeter defining a custom-shaped fence, an area inside the fence constituting the user-defined roaming area and an area outside said roaming area constituting a trigger zone;

said collar including a correction unit that initiates administration of a correction to the dog when the tracking location value calculated by the system indicates the dog is in the trigger zone; and

said system being further configured to weight and filter a plurality of said continuously obtained distance values when calculating the tracking location value and to assign less weight to distance values considered suspect due to disparity between said suspect distance values and previously measured distance values and previously calculated tracking location values indicating the location of the dog within the planar coordinate system.

2. The wireless fence system as set forth in claim 1, wherein each of said base units includes a first base antenna and a second base antenna and said collar includes a first collar antenna and a second collar antenna.

3. The wireless fence system as set forth in claim 1, wherein said generally central location is a house and said base unit topology includes the master base unit and three slave base units that are respectively positioned at four corners of said house.

4. The wireless fence system as set forth in claim 3, wherein said trilateration process includes receiving at the master base unit current distance values from said three slave base units, said distance values including a first distance value (DV1) between said master base unit and said remote unit, a second distance value (DV2) between a first slave base unit and said remote unit, a third distance value (DV3) between a second slave base unit and said remote unit, and a fourth distance value (DV4) between a third slave base unit and said remote unit;

defining a circle around said master base unit having a radius equal to DV1;

defining a circle around said first slave base unit having a radius equal to DV2;

defining a circle around said second slave base unit having a radius equal to DV3;

defining a circle around said third slave base unit having a radius equal to DV4;

checking for an intersection between those two circles having radii corresponding with the two smallest distance values, said intersection when found including two points, each of said two points representing a possible location of the remote unit; and

using a circle having a next smallest distance value as a third circle to find a point of intersection between the third circle and one of said two points within a tolerance value, said point of intersection representing the current location value of the remote unit.

5. The wireless fence system as set forth in claim 4, said system being configured to smooth out the current location value by determining a trilateration level of said current location value, said trilateration level being a relative measure of the nearness of the third circle'"'"'s point of intersection with one of the two points at which the first two circles intersected, ranking the trilateration level values according to likely accuracy and using said ranked trilateration values to weight the current location value.

6. The wireless fence system as set forth in claim 1, further comprising a plurality of flags placed along or close to the fence by the user during system set-up, said flags visually indicating a proximity of said trigger zone.

7. The wireless fence system as set forth in claim 1, wherein said roaming area includes at least one exclusion zone, a boundary of said exclusion zone being defined by the user during an exclusion zone set-up stage after the fence set-up stage by the user walking the trackable device around the exclusion zone boundary while the base units track consecutive positions of the trackable device.

8. The wireless fence system as set forth in claim 7, wherein said fence and said exclusion zone boundary are made of a plurality of connected line segments, end points of said line segments being defined by selected positions of the trackable device as tracked by the base units during the fence and exclusion zone set-up stages.

9. The wireless fence system as set forth in claim 8, wherein said system is configured to detect a breach of said fence using a point-in-polygon methodology that includes using the tracking location value or a current location value as a starting point, mathematically generating a vector from said starting point to infinity, calculating a number of fence and exclusion zone line segments intersected by said vector, and if said number is odd, determining that the current location value or tracking location value is within the roaming area and, if said number is even, determining that the current location value or tracking location value is either in an exclusion zone or outside the fence.

10. The wireless fence system as set forth in claim 2, wherein said collar correction unit includes a compartment containing a printed circuit board (PCB) assembly, said collar transceiver being integrated within said PCB assembly.

11. The wireless fence system as set forth in claim 10, wherein said collar further includes a first strap part connected to one side of said compartment and a second strap part connected to an opposite side of said compartment, said strap parts being configured to fasten said collar around a dog'"'"'s neck, said first collar antenna being inserted into a blind channel in said first strap part and said second collar antenna being inserted into a blind channel in said second strap part, free ends of said first and second collar antennas protruding from said strap parts being received within said compartment and coupled to connectors on said PCB assembly.

12. The wireless fence system as set forth in claim 11, wherein said compartment includes an upper housing and a lower housing, said PCB assembly and the free ends of said strap parts being received within said lower housing, and said upper housing being sealed to said lower housing so that said collar is waterproof.

13. The wireless fence system as set forth in claim 1, further comprising visualization software compatible with a personal computer device having a display screen, said software configured to run during the fence set-up stage and to create a visual representation of the fence which is displayed on the display screen.

14. The wireless fence system as set forth in claim 13, wherein said visualization software includes an auto-scaling feature that automatically sizes the virtual representation of the created fence to a “

full-screen”

view on the display.

15. The wireless fence system as set forth in claim 13, wherein the visualization software displays the locations of the base units and includes an on-screen grid system that permits the user to make distance measurement estimates between various points shown in the screen.

16. The wireless fence system as set forth in claim 13, wherein said visualization software is configured to create a visual depiction of the fence on the display as the user walks the fence with the collar and to present at least one screen appearance change upon movement of the collar into the trigger zone indicating a breach of the fence.

17. The wireless fence system as set forth in claim 16, wherein said screen appearance change includes a change in color of the fence when the breach occurs.

18. The wireless fence system as set forth in claim 13, wherein said visualization software creates a digital log file of the consecutive positions of the trackable device recorded during fence set-up, said digital log file providing the data that is used to create the visual representation of the fence which is displayed on the display screen.

19. The wireless fence system as set forth in claim 1, wherein said trackable device is the collar.

20. The wireless fence system as set forth in claim 1, further comprising a remote controller.

21. The wireless fence system as set forth in claim 20, wherein said remote controller is configured as said trackable device.

22. A method of defining a custom roaming area and of locating an object within the roaming area using a wireless fence system, said system including a plurality of base units including a master base unit and at least two slave base units each having a transceiver unit, and at least one movable remote unit constituting the object to be located and having a transceiver unit, said method comprising the steps of:

placing the base units in spaced relationship to one another with respect to a generally central location;

activating the master base unit to bring said master base unit and said slave base units into two-way communication with one another, said master base unit determining and recording respective distances and spatial relationships between itself and the slave base units on a predefined planar coordinate system in which said distances and spatial relationships are identified by respective coordinates within said planar coordinate system to define an overall base unit topology;

creating the custom roaming area by a user moving a trackable device along a path that defines a fence surrounding the roaming area, said base units tracking consecutive positions of the trackable device as the trackable device is moved along the path, an area outside said fence constituting a trigger zone;

placing the movable remote unit within the roaming area and continuously obtaining distance values between each of the base units and the remote unit on a real time basis;

calculating by the master base unit current location values of the remote unit within the planar coordinate system on an ongoing basis using the distance values and a trilateration process; and

weighting and filtering a plurality of said continuously obtained distance values when calculating the current location values and assigning less weight to distance values considered suspect due to disparity between said suspect distance values and previously measured distance values and previously calculated current location values indicating the location of the remote unit within the planar coordinate system.

23. The method as set forth in claim 22, further comprising the step of verifying, by the user, the fence location after creating the custom roaming area, said step of verifying the fence location including running visualization software during the step of creating the custom roaming area, said visualization software being compatible with a personal computer device having a display screen, said software creating a visual representation of the fence which is displayed on the display screen.

24. The method as set forth in claim 23, further comprising, after defining the fence, the step of moving the trackable device along a line adjacent and inside the fence to verify fence location and shape.

25. The method as set forth in claim 23, wherein the visualization software displays the locations of the base units and includes an on-screen grid system that permits the user to make distance measurement estimates between various points shown in the screen.

26. The method as set forth in claim 23, wherein said step of verifying further comprises the step of the user walking the fence with the movable remote unit or other trackable device, said visualization software being configured to create a visual depiction of the fence on the display as the user walks the fence and to present at least one screen appearance change upon movement of the movable remote unit or other trackable device into the trigger zone indicating a breach of the fence.

27. The method as set forth in claim 26, wherein said screen appearance change includes a change in color of the fence when the breach occurs.

28. The method as set forth in claim 23, further comprising said visualization software creating a digital log file of the consecutive positions of the trackable device recorded during the step of creating the custom roaming area, said digital log file providing the data that is used to create the visual representation of the fence which is displayed on the display screen.

29. The method as set forth in claim 28, further comprising the step of using the digital log file as a troubleshooting mechanism to identify any areas of base unit communication difficulty.

30. The method as set forth in claim 29, further comprising reviewing the digital log file and comparing image data obtained therefrom to images from a satellite service to identify any discrepancies exceeding a threshold and, if a discrepancy exceeding the threshold exists, manually entering a topology value more nearly corresponding with the satellite service images.

31. The method as set forth in claim 22, further comprising the step of creating at least one exclusion zone within the roaming area by the user moving the trackable device along a path that will define a boundary surrounding the exclusion zone, said base units tracking consecutive positions of the trackable device as the trackable device is moved along the boundary.

32. The method as set forth in claim 31, wherein said fence and boundary lines are made of a plurality of connected line segments, end points of said line segments being defined by selected positions of the trackable device as tracked and recorded by the base units.

33. The method as set forth in claim 32, further comprising detecting a breach of said fence by said remote unit using a point-in-polygon methodology, said point-in-polygon methodology including the steps of:

using a current location value as a starting point;

mathematically generating a vector from said starting point to infinity;

calculating a number of fence and exclusion zone line segments intersected by said vector;

if said number is odd, determining that the current location value is within the roaming area and, if said number is even, determining that the current location value is either in an exclusion zone or outside the fence.

34. The method as set forth in claim 22, further comprising smoothing out consecutive distance values using a Kalman filtering technique that includes the steps of:

assigning a weight to each measured distance value based on a comparison made between the currently measured distance value and the previously estimated distance value using an algorithm, said algorithm giving less weight to the currently measured distance value if a difference between the currently measured distance value and the previously estimated distance value is greater than a predetermined threshold, and said algorithm giving a greater weight to the currently measured distance value if the difference between the currently measured distance value and the previously estimated distance value is less than the predetermined threshold; and

using said weighted distance values to calculate an updated current location value indicating the location of the remote unit within the planar coordinate system.

35. The method as set forth in claim 22, further comprising the step of sounding an alarm at the master base unit when the current location value calculated by the system indicates the remote unit is in the trigger zone.

36. The method as set forth in claim 22, further comprising the steps of placing a plurality of flags along or close to the fence by the user during system set-up, said flags visually indicating a proximity of said trigger zone.

37. The method as set forth in claim 22, wherein said system is a wireless fence product for containing one or more dogs in a user-defined roaming area, said remote unit including a collar worn by a dog, said collar including a collar correction unit, said method further comprising the step of said collar correction unit initiating administration of a correction to the dog when the current location value calculated by the system indicates the dog is in the trigger zone.

38. The method as set forth in claim 22, wherein three slave base units are included and said trilateration process used in said step of calculating a current location value indicating the location of the remote unit includes the steps of:

receiving at the master base unit current distance values from three of said slave base units, said distance values including a first distance value (DV1) between said master base unit and said remote unit, a second distance value (DV2) between a first slave base unit and said remote unit, a third distance value (DV3) between a second slave base unit and said remote unit, and a fourth distance value (DV4) between a third slave base unit and said remote unit;

defining a circle around said master base unit having a radius equal to DV1;

defining a circle around said first slave base unit having a radius equal to DV2;

defining a circle around said second slave base unit having a radius equal to DV3;

defining a circle around said third slave base unit having a radius equal to DV4;

checking for an intersection between those two circles having radii corresponding with the two smallest distance values, said intersection when found including two points, each of said two points representing a possible location of the remote unit;

using the circle having the next smallest distance value as a third circle to find a point of intersection between the third circle and one of said two possible location points within a tolerance value, said point of intersection representing the current location value of the remote unit.

39. The method as set forth in claim 38, wherein if no intersection is found between the two circles having radii corresponding with the two smallest distance values, checking for an intersection between the circle having the next smallest distance value and the two circles having radii corresponding with the two smallest distance values;

if no intersection is found, checking for an intersection between the circle having the largest distance value and the two circles having radii corresponding with the two smallest distance values; and

if no intersection is found, ignoring the current distance values as being unreliable.

40. The method as set forth in claim 38, further comprising the step of ignoring the current distance values if no point of intersection is found between the third circle and one of said two possible location points within said tolerance value.

41. The method as set forth in claim 38, wherein said tolerance value is defined as a range of distances over which the system checks for said point of intersection, failure to find said point of intersection within said range of distances indicating the distance value of said third circle to be suspect, said method then further comprising the step of using the remaining circle to find a point of intersection between the remaining circle and one of said two possible location points within a tolerance value.

42. The method as set forth in claim 38, further comprising the step of smoothing out the current location value by determining a trilateration level of said current location value, said trilateration level being a relative measure of the nearness of the third circle'"'"'s point of intersection with one of the two possible location points at which the first two circles intersected.

43. The method as set forth in claim 42, further comprising the step of ranking trilateration level values according to likely accuracy and using said ranked trilateration values to weight the current location value.