Assessing Staffing Coverage for Software Applications

• US 20110307285A1
• Filed: 06/09/2010
• Published: 12/15/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 06/09/2010
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Bank of America Corp.
• Original Assignee: Bank of America Corp.
• Inventors: Kale, Brian Max, Dhulia, Sanjay Sudhirkumar
• Application Number:
  US12/797,186
• Publication Number:
  US 20110307285A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/7.14
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/063112 Skill-based matching of a person or a group to a task
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/063116 Schedule adjustment for a person or group
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06315 Needs-based resource requirements planning or analysis

Abstract

A computer system enables a business to determine a structure of a software application, obtain staffing information assigned to the application, and determine a staffing gap for different levels of the application. Staffing assessment may be expanded to a software portfolio that typically includes different applications and further to a line of business segment that corresponds to one or more portfolios. Supply coverage and demand coverage for each of the application levels is then determined so that staffing gaps for each of the application levels can be assessed. Staffing information may include staffing at different skill levels include subject matter experts, specialists, and generalists. The structure of an application may include modules that further include sub-modules. A training plan may be invoked when staffing is overly dependent on contractor support.

Claims

1. A computer-assisted method comprising:

determining, by a computer system, a structure of an application, wherein the structure comprises a plurality of application levels;

obtaining, by the computer system, staffing information of a business for the application based on the structure;

determining a staffing coverage and a staffing demand for each of the application levels; and

assessing a staffing gap for the application from the staffing demand and the staffing coverage at said each of the application levels.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the staffing information is indicative of subject matter experts assigned to the application.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the structure comprises an intermediary level and a basic level.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the determining the structure comprises:

mapping a plurality of modules with the application, wherein the plurality of modules corresponds to the intermediary level; and

mapping a plurality of sub-modules associated with the application, wherein the plurality of sub-modules corresponds to the basic level and wherein each sub-module is associated with one of the plurality of modules.

5. The method of claim 2, further comprising:

differentiating whether each of the subject matter experts is an associate of the business.

6. The method of claim 5, further comprising:

determining associate coverage and contractor coverage for the application.

7. The method of claim 6, further comprising:

comparing the associate coverage with a first predetermined threshold; and

generating a first indicator based on the comparing, the first indicator indicative when training of additional associates are needed.

8. The method of claim 6, further comprising:

comparing the contractor coverage with a second predetermined threshold; and

generating a second indicator based on the comparing, the second indicator indicative when redeployment of assigned contractors are needed.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the application is associated with a portfolio, the method further comprising:

repeating the obtaining for another application, wherein the other application is associated with the portfolio; and

assessing staffing coverage for the portfolio.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the portfolio is associated with a business segment, the method further comprising:

repeating the obtaining for another portfolio, wherein the other portfolio is associated with the business segment; and

assessing the staffing coverage for the business segment.

11. An apparatus comprising:

at least one memory; and

at least one processor coupled to the at least one memory and configured to perform, based on instructions stored in the at least one memory;

determining a structure of an application, wherein the structure comprises a plurality of application levels;

obtaining staffing information about subject matter experts assigned to the application based on the structure;

determining whether there is a staffing gap for the application from a staffing demand and a staffing coverage at each of the application levels.

12. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to perform:

mapping a plurality of modules with the application.

13. The apparatus of claim 12, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to perform:

mapping a plurality of sub-modules with the application, wherein each sub-module is associated with one of the plurality of modules.

14. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to perform:

differentiating whether each of the subject matter experts is an associate of a business.

15. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to perform:

determining associate coverage and contractor coverage for the application.

16. A computer-readable storage medium storing computer-executable instructions that, when executed, cause a processor to perform a method comprising:

determining a structure of an application, wherein the structure comprises a plurality of application levels;

obtaining staffing information about subject matter experts for the application based on the structure;

determining a staffing demand and a staffing coverage for each of the application levels; and

assessing whether there is a staffing gap for the application from the staffing demand and the staffing coverage at said each of the application levels.

17. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 16, said method further comprising:

mapping a plurality of modules with the application, wherein the plurality of modules corresponds to the intermediary level.

18. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 16, said method further comprising:

mapping a plurality of sub-modules with the application, wherein the plurality of sub-modules corresponds to the basic level and wherein each sub-module is associated with one of the plurality of modules.

19. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 16, said method further comprising:

differentiating whether each of the subject matter experts is an associate of a business.

20. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 16, said method further comprising:

determining associate coverage and contractor coverage for the application.

21. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 16, said method further comprising:

comparing the associate coverage and the contractor coverage with at least one predetermined threshold; and

generating a first indicator and a second indicator based on the comparing, the first indicator indicative when training of additional associates are needed and the second indicator indicative when redeployment of assigned contractors are needed.