SIGNIFICANCE LEVEL AUTOMATION

• US 20120005689A1
• Filed: 06/30/2010
• Published: 01/05/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 06/30/2010
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Micro Focus LLC (Open Text Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. (HP Inc.)
• Inventors: SCHWARTZ, Dror, Kessner, Amir, Zemer, Meidan, Barak, Michal, Aronov, Svetlana, Monza, Sagi
• Granted Patent: US 8,621,486 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 719/318
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3668 Software testing software testing in telephone exchanges H04M3/242, testing of hardware G06F11/22

Abstract

Techniques for using action significance levels in an automation system are disclosed herein. In one embodiment, an automation system includes an event detector, and event analyzer, and a player. The event detector is configured to detect an event affecting execution of an application being monitored by the automation system. The event analyzer is configured to analyze a detected event and determine importance of an action causing the event to operation of the application. Based on the determined importance, the event analyzer assigns one of a plurality of predetermined significance levels to the action. The player is configured to reproduce each action assigned a significance level at least as high as a selected replay level and to not reproduce any action assigned a significance level lower than the replay level.

Claims

1. A automation system, comprising:

an event detector configured to detect an event affecting execution of an application being monitored by the automation system;

an event analyzer configured to analyze a detected event and determine importance of an action causing the event to operation of the application, and based on the determined importance to assign one of a plurality of predetermined significance levels to the action; and

a player configured to reproduce each action assigned a significance level at least as high as a selected replay level and to not reproduce any action assigned a significance level lower than the replay level.

2. The automation system of claim 1, wherein the event analyzer is configured to assign a significance level to the action based on a type of the action and a predetermined importance assigned to the type.

3. The automation system of claim 1, wherein the event analyzer is configured to analyze a response of the application to the event and assign a significance level to the action based on the response.

4. The automation system of claim 1, wherein the event analyzer is configured to assign a significance level to the action based on a type of an object of the application affected by the action.

5. The automation system of claim 1, wherein the event analyzer is configured to assign a significance level to the action based on a result of the event in the application, wherein the result is based on a plurality of actions that includes the action.

6. The automation system of claim 1, wherein each of the significance levels is indicative of a different degree of detail of action recorded.

7. The automation system of claim 1, further comprising an event editor configured to change the significance level assigned to the action based on user input.

8. The automation system of claim 1, wherein the player is configured to allow selection of the replay level from a plurality of replay levels corresponding to the plurality of significance levels.

9. The automation system of claim 1, wherein the system records all actions causing a detected event, and the event analyzer assigns one of the plurality of significance levels to each action.

10. The automation system of claim 1, wherein the event analyzer is configured to change the significance level of a first action based on subsequent detection of a different event related to a second action.

11. A method, comprising:

executing, by one or more processors, an application program;

detecting, by the one or more processors, an event affecting the execution;

determining, by the one or more processors, a degree of importance of an action causing the event to operation of the application; and

assigning, by the one or more processors, based on the determined degree of importance, one of a plurality of predetermined significance levels to the action.

12. The method of claim 11, further comprising assigning the significance level to the action based on one or more of a type of the action and a predetermined importance assigned to the type, a response of the application to the event, a type of object of the application affected by the action, and a result of the event in the application.

13. The method of claim 11, further comprising changing a significance level previously assigned to an action based on user input.

14. The method of claim 11, further comprising replaying a script by reproducing each action assigned to a given one of the significance levels or any significance higher than the given significance level, and not reproducing any action assigned to a significance level lower than the given significance level.

15. The method of claim 11, further comprising recording all actions causing a detected event, and assigning one of the plurality of significance levels to each action.

16. A computer-readable medium encoded with a computer program that when executed causes one or more computers to:

detect an event affecting an application executing on the one or more computers;

determine a degree of importance of an action causing the event to operation of the application; and

assign, based on the determined degree of importance, one of a plurality of predetermined significance levels to the action.

17. The computer-readable medium of claim 16, further encoded with a computer program that causes assignment of the significance level to the action based on one or more of a type of the action and a predetermined importance assigned to the type, a response of the application to the event, a type of object of the application affected by the action, and a result of the event in the application.

18. The computer-readable medium of claim 16, further encoded with a computer program that changes a significance level previously assigned to a first action based on subsequent detection of a different event caused by a second action.

19. The computer-readable medium of claim 16, further encoded with a computer program that replays a script by reproducing each action assigned to a given one of the significance levels or a level higher that the given significance level, and not reproducing any action assigned to a significance level lower than the given significance level.

20. The computer-readable medium of claim 16, further encoded with a computer program that records all actions causing a detected event, and assigning one of the plurality of significance levels to each action.