METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR QUALITY CONTROL OF ELECTRONIC PRESCRIPTIONS

• US 20120016687A1
• Filed: 07/14/2010
• Published: 01/19/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 07/14/2010
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Surescripts
• Original Assignee: Surescripts
• Inventors: Dhavle, Ajit A., Yakimischak, David
• Application Number:
  US12/836,205
• Publication Number:
  US 20120016687A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/2
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 20/10 relating to drugs or medications, e.g. for ensuring correct administration to patients
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 70/40 relating to drugs, e.g. their side effects or intended usage

Abstract

Apparatuses, methods, and computer readable medium for quality control checking of electronic prescriptions. The method including receiving an electronic prescription; determining whether or not the electronic prescription meets a quality standard for each of a plurality of quality issues and marking a scorecard to indicate whether or not the electronic prescription meets the quality standard for each of the plurality of quality issues; and if the scorecard indicates the electronic prescription meets a minimum quality standard then forwarding the electronic prescription for fulfillment, otherwise if the scorecard indicates the electronic prescription does not meet a minimum quality standard forwarding the electronic prescription for review.

Claims

1. A method on a computer for quality control checking of electronic prescriptions, the method comprising:

receiving an electronic prescription,

determining whether or not the electronic prescription meets a quality standard for each of a plurality of quality issues and generating a quality scorecard to indicate whether or not the electronic prescription meets the quality standard for each of the plurality of quality issues; and

if the scorecard indicates the electronic prescription meets a minimum quality standard then forwarding the electronic prescription across a computer network for fulfillment,

otherwise if the scorecard indicates the electronic prescription does not meet a minimum quality standard forwarding the electronic prescription for review.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein otherwise if comprises:

forwarding the electronic prescription for review; and

forwarding the electronic prescription for fulfillment.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein otherwise if comprises:

forwarding the electronic prescription for review; and

forwarding the electronic prescription back to at least one of the prescriber or a prescriber technology vender with an indication that the electronic prescription did not meet at least one quality standard.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein otherwise if comprises:

forwarding the electronic prescription for review; and

forwarding the electronic prescription in real time to an expert to assess whether or not to forward the electronic prescription for fulfillment.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein one of the plurality of quality issues is whether or not the electronic prescription matches a drug product in a drug product database, and wherein the method further comprises:

determining whether the electronic prescription matches a drug product in a drug product database; and

marking the scorecard to indicate whether a match was found.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the electronic prescription includes a plurality of fields, and wherein one of the plurality of quality issues is whether or not the plurality of fields is consistent, and wherein the method further comprises:

determining whether the plurality of fields is consistent with one another; and

marking the scorecard to indicate whether the plurality of fields is consistent with one another.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the electronic prescription includes a free text description field and a drug strength field, and wherein one of the plurality of quality issues is whether or not the drug strength field matches a drug strength in the free text drug description field, and wherein the method further comprises:

verifying that the drug strength field matches the drug strength in the free text drug description field; and

marking the scorecard to indicate whether the drug strength field matches the drug strength in the free text drug description field.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the electronic prescription includes a free text description field and a drug strength qualifier field, and wherein one of the plurality of quality issues is whether or not the drug strength qualifier field matches a drug strength qualifier in the free text drug description field and wherein the method further comprises:

verifying that the drug strength qualifier field matches the drug strength qualifier in the free text drug description field; and

marking the scorecard to indicate whether the drug strength qualifier field matches the drug strength qualifier in the free text drug description field.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the electronic prescription includes a free text description field and a drug dosage form field and wherein one of the plurality of quality issues is whether or not the drug dosage form field matches a drug dosage form in the free text drug description field, and wherein the method further comprises:

verifying that the drug dosage form field matches the drug dosage form in the free text drug description field; and

marking the scorecard to indicate whether the drug dosage form field matches the drug dosage form in the free text drug description field.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the electronic prescription includes a free text description field and a quantify qualifier field and wherein one of the plurality of quality issues is whether or not a quantity qualifier field matches a drug dosage form in the free text drug description field;

and wherein the method further comprises;

verifying that the quantity qualifier field matches the drug dosage form in the free text drug description field, wherein a synonym database may be used to determine whether or not the quantity qualifier field matches the drug dosage form; and

marking the scorecard to indicate whether the quantify qualifier field matches the drug dosage form in the free text drug description field.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein the electronic prescription includes a free text description field and a generic-brand field and wherein one of the plurality of quality issues is whether or not the generic-brand field is consistent with a drug name in the free text drug description field, and wherein the method further comprises:

verifying that the generic-brand field is consistent with the drug name in the free text drug description field; and

marking the scorecard to indicate whether the generic-brand field is consistent with the drug name in the free text drug description field.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the electronic prescription includes at least one field indicating demographic information of the patient, and wherein one of the plurality of quality issues is whether or not the electronic prescription is appropriate for the at least one field indicating demographic information of the patient, and wherein the method further comprises:

verifying that the electronic prescription is appropriate for the at least one field indicating demographic information of the patient by using clinical decision support information; and

marking the scorecard to indicate whether the electronic prescription is appropriate for the at least one field indicating demographic information of the patient by using clinical decision support information.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the at least one field indicating demographic information of the patient includes at least one of patient age and patient sex.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein the electronic prescription includes a field indicating pharmacy information for fulfilling the electronic prescription, and wherein one of the plurality of quality issues is whether or not the field indicating pharmacy information matches a computer database of pharmacy information, and wherein the method further comprises:

matching the field indicating pharmacy information with the computer database of pharmacy information; and

marking the scorecard to indicate whether the field indicating pharmacy information matches pharmacy information in the database of pharmacy information.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein the electronic prescription includes a field indicating prescriber information, and wherein one of the plurality of quality issues is whether or not the field indicating prescriber information matches a computer database of prescriber information, and wherein the method further comprises:

matching the field indicating prescriber information with the computer database of prescriber information; and

marking the scorecard to indicate whether the field indicating prescriber information matches prescriber information in the database of prescriber information.

16. The method of claim 1, wherein the electronic prescription includes a field indicating quantify information, and wherein one of the plurality of quality issues is whether or not the quantify information is appropriate, and wherein the method further comprises:

verifying the quantify information is appropriate by using clinical decision support information; and

marking the scorecard to indicate whether the quantify information is appropriate.

17. The method of claim 1, wherein one of the plurality of quality issues is whether or not a quantity of the electronic prescription is appropriate, and wherein the method further comprises:

determining the quantity of the electronic prescription;

verifying the quantity by using clinical decision support information; and

marking the scorecard to indicate whether the quantity is appropriate.

18. The method of claim 1, wherein the electronic prescription includes a field indicating directions for use, and wherein one of the plurality of quality issues is whether or not the directions for use is appropriate and the method further comprises:

verifying the field indicating directions does not include Latin words; and

marking the scorecard to indicate whether the field indicating directions for use is appropriate.

19. The method of claim 1, wherein the electronic prescription includes a field indicating directions for use, and wherein one of the plurality of quality issues is whether or not the directions are appropriate, and the method further comprises:

parsing a field indicating directions to verify the directions are appropriate for the electronic prescription using NLP; and

marking the scorecard to indicate whether the field indicating directions for use is appropriate.

20. The method of claim 1, wherein the electronic prescription includes a field indicating notes for a pharmacy, and wherein one of the plurality of quality issues is whether or not the notes for the pharmacy are appropriate for the electronic prescription, and the method further comprises:

parsing the field indicating notes for a pharmacy to verify the notes are appropriate for the electronic prescription; and

marking the scorecard to indicate whether the field indicating notes for a pharmacy is appropriate for the electronic prescription.

21. The method of claim 20, wherein parsing further comprises:

parsing the field indicating notes for a pharmacy using natural language processing to verify the notes only contain additional prescriber instructions to the pharmacy.

22. The method of claim 5, wherein determining further comprises:

if a match is not found, matching the electronic prescription to one of a plurality of synonyms for drug products in the drug product database.

23. The method of claim 2, wherein forwarding the electronic prescription for fulfillment, comprises:

forwarding the electronic prescription for fulfillment with an indication that the electronic prescription did not met at least one quality standard.

24. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

creating a report indicating the number of electronic prescriptions that met a minimum quality standard and the number of electronic prescriptions that did not meet a minimum quality standard and the report indicating which of the quality issues did not met the corresponding quality standard.

25. The method of claim 5, wherein determining whether the electronic prescription matches comprises:

determining whether the electronic prescription matches a drug product in a drug product database, wherein the drug products in the drug product database are associated with unique National Drug Code (NDC) numbers.

26. The method of claim 1, wherein the electronic prescription is received over a computer network.

27. The method of claim 1, wherein forwarding comprises:

forwarding the electronic prescription over a computer network for fulfillment.

28. A computer program product, comprising:

a computer-readable medium comprising;

a first set of codes for receiving from a computer network an electronic prescription;

a second set of codes for determining whether or not the electronic prescription meets a quality standard for each of a plurality of quality issues;

a third set of codes for generating a quality scorecard to indicate whether or not the electronic prescription meets the quality standard for each of the plurality of quality issues; and

a fourth set of code for forwarding the electronic prescription across a computer network for fulfillment, if the scorecard indicates the electronic prescription meets a minimum quality standard; and

a fifth set of code for forwarding the electronic prescription for review, if the scorecard indicates the electronic prescription does not meet a minimum quality standard.

29. A computer system for quality control checking of electronic prescriptions, the system comprising:

a process adapted to;

receive from a computer network an electronic prescription;

determine whether or not the electronic prescription meets a quality standard for each of a plurality of quality issues;

generate a quality scorecard to indicate whether or not the electronic prescription met the quality standard for each of the plurality of quality issues;

forward the electronic prescription across a computer network for fulfillment if the scorecard indicates the electronic prescription meets a minimum quality standard; and

forward the electronic prescription for review, if the scorecard indicates the electronic prescription does not meet a minimum quality standard.

30. The computer system of claim 29, wherein one of the plurality of quality issues is whether or not the electronic prescription matches one of a plurality of stored descriptions of electronic prescriptions, and wherein the process is further adapted to:

determine whether the electronic prescription matches one of a plurality of stored descriptions of electronic prescriptions; and

mark the scorecard to indicate whether a match was found.

31. The computer system of claim 29, wherein the electronic prescription includes a plurality of fields, and wherein one of the plurality of quality issues is whether or not the plurality of fields is consistent, and wherein the processor is further adapted to:

determine whether the plurality of fields is consistent with one another; and

mark the scorecard to indicate whether the plurality of fields is consistent with one another.

32. A method on a computer for quality control checking of electronic prescriptions, the method comprising:

receiving an electronic prescription,

determining whether or not the electronic prescription meets a quality standard for each of a plurality of quality issues and generating a quality scorecard to indicate whether or not the electronic prescription meets the quality standard for each of the plurality of quality issues; and

creating a report indicating the number of electronic prescriptions that met a minimum quality standard and the number of electronic prescriptions that did not meet a minimum quality standard and the report indicating which of the quality issues did not met the corresponding quality standard.