Decision Bubbles

• US 20120023170A1
• Filed: 07/20/2011
• Published: 01/26/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 07/20/2010
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Sparkling Logic, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Sparkling Logic, Inc.
• Inventors: Serrano-Morales, Carlos, Matignon, Carole-Ann
• Application Number:
  US13/187,387
• Publication Number:
  US 20120023170A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 709/205
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/0637 Strategic management or analysis, e.g. setting a goal or target of an organisation; Planning actions based on goals; Analysis or evaluation of effectiveness of goals

Abstract

The present invention is a method for business users to collaborate on a decision within a decision bubble. A decision bubble is a specifically created environment in which a group of collaborators can interact with the purpose of creating and modifying decisions or business rules, and through which the system captures interactions between collaborators and enables traceability with respect to the resulting decisions. Using a lightweight business process, a decision bubble is initiated by a business user, the bubble owner, and can have in its scope any section of the decisions being managed. The bubble owner may issue invitations to the bubble to collaborators, some of which may be suggested by the system using a reputation system that scores users with respect to types of tasks and entities. The decision bubble contains all the contextual information required for the bubble collaborators to collaborate on the implementation or modifications of the decisions or rules. In one embodiment, only the users within the bubble can see and manage the newly created or modified decisions or rules. When the changes are deemed final by the bubble collaborators, the bubble may be merged back to the current state of the decisions, and the system keeps track of all interactions that led to the changed decisions, as well as all participants to it.

Claims

1. A method of collaborating on a decision within a decision bubble, the method comprising the steps of:

creating a decision bubble;

creating a group of candidate collaborators;

inviting one or more candidate collaborators to join the decision bubble as bubble collaborators;

enabling a bubble owner to select the bubble collaborators from the candidate collaborators;

receiving contextual data and inputting the contextual data into the decision bubble, the contextual data being provided by the bubble collaborators;

storing the contextual data in a memory;

programmatically computing recommended decision logic based on the data without human intervention;

outputting data for displaying the recommended decision logic to the bubble owner or to the bubble collaborators;

wherein the decision bubble is a closed environment by invitation; and

wherein the closed environment is shared by the bubble collaborators.

2. The method of collaborating on a decision in a decision bubble of claim 1, wherein the bubble collaborators consist of the decision bubble owner, peers, experts or a group of professionals.

3. The method of collaborating on a decision in a decision bubble of claim 1, wherein the creating a group of candidate collaborators is based on input from at least one user.

4. The method of collaborating on a decision in a decision bubble of claim 1, further comprising the step of rating the quality of the contextual data, the rating being done by the bubble owner or the bubble collaborators.

5. The method of collaborating on a decision in a decision bubble of claim 1, further comprising the step of rating the quality of the bubble collaborators, the rating being done by the bubble owner or the bubble collaborators

6. The method of collaborating on a decision in a decision bubble of claim 1, further comprising the step of ranking the candidate collaborators, wherein the ranking is based on subject matter of the contextual data, previously received input from other users and assessments from other decision bubbles.

7. The method of collaborating on a decision in a decision bubble of claim 6, wherein the enabling of the bubble owner to select the bubble collaborators from the candidate collaborators is based at least in part on the ranking

8. The method of collaborating on a decision in a decision bubble of claim 1, further comprising the step of terminating the decision bubble at any time by the decision bubble owner or one of the bubble collaborators when the one of the bubble collaborators has appropriate privileges.

9. The method of collaborating on a decision in a decision bubble of claim 1, further comprising the step of receiving social feedback from the bubble owner or the bubble collaborators while the bubble owner or the bubble collaborators are inside or outside the decision bubble.

10. The method of collaborating on a decision in a decision bubble of claim 1, further comprising the step of utilizing a software wizard to aid the bubble owner or the bubble collaborators.

11. A method of collaborating on a decision within a decision bubble, the method comprising the steps of:

creating a decision bubble;

creating a group of candidate collaborators;

inviting one or more candidate collaborators to join the decision bubble as bubble collaborators;

enabling a bubble owner to select the bubble collaborators from the candidate collaborators;

receiving contextual data and inputting the contextual data into the decision bubble, the contextual data being provided by the bubble collaborators;

storing the contextual data in a memory;

programmatically computing recommended decision logic based on the data without human intervention;

outputting data for displaying the recommended decision logic to the bubble owner or to the bubble collaborators;

wherein the decision bubble is an open environment;

wherein the bubble collaborators work independently; and

wherein results from the work is sent to the decision bubble and/or the bubble owner.

12. The method of collaborating on a decision in a decision bubble of claim 11, further comprising the step of receiving social feedback from the bubble owner or the bubble collaborators while the bubble owner or the bubble collaborators are inside or outside the decision bubble.

13. The method of collaborating on a decision in a decision bubble of claim 11, further comprising the step of rating the quality of the contextual data, the rating being done by the bubble owner or the candidate collaborators.

14. The method of collaborating on a decision in a decision bubble of claim 11, further comprising the step of rating the quality of the bubble collaborators, the rating being done by one of the bubble collaborators.

15. The method of collaborating on a decision in a decision bubble of claim 11, further comprising the step of ranking the candidate collaborators, wherein the ranking is based on the subject matter of the contextual data, previously received input from other users, or assessments from other decision bubbles..

16. The method of collaborating on a decision in a decision bubble of claim 15, wherein the enabling of the bubble owner to select the bubble collaborators from the candidate collaborators is based at least in part on the ranking.

17. A method of collaborating on a decision within a decision bubble, the method comprising the steps of:

creating a decision bubble;

creating a group of candidate collaborators;

inviting one or more candidate collaborators to join the decision bubble as bubble collaborators;

enabling a bubble owner to select the bubble collaborators from the candidate collaborators;

receiving contextual data and inputting the contextual data into the decision bubble, the contextual data being provided by the bubble collaborators;

storing the contextual data in a memory;

programmatically computing recommended decision logic based on the data without human intervention;

outputting data for displaying the recommended decision logic to the bubble owner or to the bubble collaborators; and

receiving social feedback from the bubble owner or the bubble collaborators while the bubble owner or the bubble collaborators are inside or outside the decision bubble.

18. The method of collaborating on a decision in a decision bubble of claim 17, further comprising the step of rating the quality of the bubble collaborators, the rating being done by the bubble owner or one of the bubble collaborators.

19. The method of collaborating on a decision in a decision bubble of claim 17, further comprising the step of ranking the candidate collaborators, wherein the ranking is based on subject matter of the contextual data, previously received input from other users, or assessments from other decision bubbles.

20. The method of collaborating on a decision in a decision bubble of claim 19, wherein the enabling of the bubble owner to select the bubble collaborators from the candidate collaborators is based at least in part on the ranking