SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING SPOOF DETECTION

• US 20120041620A1
• Filed: 08/09/2011
• Published: 02/16/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 08/10/2010
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Aviation Communication and Surveillance Systems LLC (L3Harris Technologies, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Aviation Communication and Surveillance Systems LLC (L3Harris Technologies, Inc.)
• Inventors: Stayton, Gregory T., Smith, Mark D., Tomooka, Heidi A.
• Application Number:
  US13/206,369
• Publication Number:
  US 20120041620A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 701/3
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 5/0008 with other aircraft
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 5/0013 with a ground station
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 5/0021 located in the aircraft

Abstract

Spoof detection can be performed by various systems and methods. The systems and methods can provide for detection by passive listening, active interrogation, and other techniques. Moreover, systems and methods can also provide for reporting and displaying information relating to detected spoofing. For example, a method can include receiving, on a device, a signal providing a report for an aircraft. The method can also include determining, with the device, a first parameter for the aircraft from information in the report. The method can further include determining, with the device, a second parameter for the aircraft from at least one signal characteristic of the signal. The method can additionally include determining, with the device, a validity status of the report based on comparing the first parameter and the second parameter.

Claims

1. A method, comprising:

receiving, on a device, a signal providing a report for an aircraft;

determining, with the device, a first parameter for the aircraft from information in the report;

determining, with the device, a second parameter for the aircraft from at least one signal characteristic of the signal; and

determining, with the device, a validity status of the report based on comparing the first parameter and the second parameter.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the device is comprised in own aircraft.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the report comprises a position report.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the signal comprises a signal including an ADS-B message.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the first parameter and/or the second parameter comprises a bearing of the aircraft with respect to own aircraft.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the first parameter comprises calculating a bearing to the aircraft with respect to own aircraft based on a position in the report and a position of own aircraft.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the second parameter comprises calculating a bearing based on a time, amplitude, and/or phase difference of arrival the signal.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the validity status based on the comparing comprises determining that the report is valid when a difference between the first parameter and the second parameter is less than a predetermined threshold.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the signal comprises a signal including a Mode S message, a UAT message, a TIS-B message, or a FIS-B message.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the first parameter and/or the second parameter comprises at least one of the following:

range of the aircraft;

range rate of the aircraft;

range acceleration of the aircraft;

bearing of the aircraft;

bearing rate of the aircraft;

bearing acceleration of the aircraft;

altitude of the aircraft;

altitude rate of the aircraft;

or

altitude acceleration of the aircraft.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein the signal characteristic comprises at least one of the following:

radio frequency power level of the signal;

differential time measurement of receipt of the signal;

or

Doppler frequency change of the signal.

12. A system, comprising:

at least one processor; and

at least one memory including computer program instructions,

wherein the at least one memory and the computer program instructions are configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the system at least to receive a signal providing a report for an aircraft;

determine a first parameter for the aircraft from information in the report;

determine a second parameter for the aircraft from at least one signal characteristic of the signal; and

determine a validity status of the report based on comparing the first parameter and the second parameter.

13. The system of claim 12, wherein the apparatus is located in own aircraft.

14. The system of claim 12, wherein the report comprises a position report.

15. The system of claim 12, wherein the signal comprises a signal including an ADS-B message.

16. The system of claim 12, wherein the first parameter and/or the second parameter comprises a bearing of the aircraft with respect to own aircraft.

17. The system of claim 12, wherein determining the first parameter comprises calculating a bearing to the aircraft with respect to own aircraft based on a position in the report and a position of own aircraft.

18. The system of claim 12, wherein determining the second parameter comprises calculating a bearing based on a time, amplitude, and/or phase difference of arrival the signal.

19. The system of claim 12, wherein determining the validity status based on the comparing comprises determining that the report is valid when a difference between the first parameter and the second parameter is less than a predetermined threshold.

20. The system of claim 12, wherein the first parameter and/or the second parameter comprises a range of the aircraft with respect to own aircraft.

21. The system of claim 12, wherein the signal comprises a signal including a Mode S message, a UAT message, a TIS-B message, or a FIS-B message.

22. A method, comprising:

receiving, with a first device, a report regarding an aircraft;

determining, with the first device, a validity status of the report; and

reporting the validity status of the report from the first device to a second device remote from the first device.

23. The method of claim 22, wherein the report comprises a position report.

24. The method of claim 22, wherein the report comprises an ADS-B message.

25. The method of claim 22, wherein the first device is located in own aircraft.

26. The method of claim 22, wherein the second device is located in one or more of another aircraft or a receiver on the ground.

27. The method of claim 22, wherein the first device or the second device comprises a ground station.

28. A system, comprising:

at least one processor; and

at least one memory including computer program instructions,

wherein the at least one memory and the computer program instructions are configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the system at least to

receive a report regarding an aircraft;

determine a validity status of the report; and

report the validity status from a first device to a second device remote from the first device.

29. The system of claim 28, wherein the report comprises a position report.

30. The system of claim 28, wherein the report comprises an ADS-B message.

31. The system of claim 28, wherein the first device is located in own aircraft.

32. The system of claim 28, wherein the second device is located in one or more of another aircraft or a receiver on the ground.

33. The system of claim 28, wherein the first device or the second device comprises a traffic control station.

34. A method, comprising:

receiving, on own aircraft, a report regarding an aircraft;

determining a validity status of the report; and

displaying and/or aurally annunciating the validity status of the report to an operator of the own aircraft.

35. A system, comprising:

at least one processor; and

at least one memory including computer program instructions,

wherein the at least one memory and the computer program instructions are configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the system at least to

receive, on own aircraft, a report regarding an aircraft;

determine a validity status of the report; and

display and/or aurally annunciate the validity status of the report to an operator of the own aircraft.

36. A method, comprising:

receiving, on a device, a signal providing a report for an aircraft;

determining, with the device, a first parameter for the aircraft from information in the report;

determining, with the device, a second parameter for the aircraft from a time of arrival of the signal; and

determining, with the device, a validity status of the report based on comparing the first parameter and the second parameter.

37. The method of claim 36, further comprising:

prior to receiving the signal providing the report, sending a request for the report.

38. The method of claim 37, wherein the determining the second parameter comprises determining a range of the aircraft based on a time when the request was sent and the time of arrival of the signal.

39. The method of claim 37, wherein the first parameter and/or the second parameter comprises a distance between the aircraft and own aircraft.

40. A system, comprising:

at least one processor; and

at least one memory including computer program instructions,

wherein the at least one memory and the computer program instructions are configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the system at least to

receive a signal providing a report for an aircraft;

determine a first parameter for the aircraft from information in the report;

determine a second parameter for the aircraft from a time of arrival of the signal; and

determine a validity status of the report based on comparing the first parameter and the second parameter.